Case law

Scenic Sites, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

27 Or. App. 831 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 1976

On May 13, 1975, the board accepted the commission’s recommendations with slight modifications. 2 The circuit court upheld the essence of the board’s order, 3 and this appeal followed. … Duddles v. City Council of West Linn, 21 Or App 310, 328 , 535 P2d 583 , Sup Ct review denied (1975). We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Remanded with directions.

Boyd v. Board of Parole

338 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON SHANE ALLEN BOYD, Petitioner, v. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Forelaws on Board v. Energy Facility Siting Council

84 Or. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 1987

This court, however, must ‘discern and declare the intent of the legislature’ [citing Whipple v. Howser, 291 Or 475, 479 , 632 P2d 782 (1981)].” … See, e.g., Gregg v. Racing Commission, 38 Or App 19, 24-25 , 588 P2d 1290 , rev den 286 Or 637 (1979).

Boxberger v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1993

See Hayes v. Board of Parole, 115 Or App 36 , 836 P2d 767 (1992). In addition, the victims were not simply under 12 years of age, they were substantially younger than 12. As we explained in Jarvis v. … Jarvis v. State Board of Parole, supra, 96 Or App at 325 . The Board did that. Affirmed.

Maimon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

138 Or. App. 328 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1995

However, in Eggsman v. Board of Parole, 60 Or App 381 , 653 P2d 1277 (1982), we held that the Board had such authority. … Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993), rev den 318 Or 325 (1994).

Board of Trustees v. Oregon Consistory No. 1

103 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1922

persons, constituting a board called the Board of School Trustees, to the corporation known as the Board of School Trustees. … By the recitals written in the deed signed by Bishop Morris, he and those in privity with him are estopped from denying that he possessed an estate more restricted than the one recited: Bayley v. McCoy, 8 Or. 262 .

Ha v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

282 Or. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2016

The board agreed with that recommendation and revoked petitioner’s parole in May 2012. Petitioner sought judicial review of the board’s order revoking his parole; we affirmed *229 that order without opinion. Ha v. … Petitioner’s argument does not take into account either OAR 255-75-096, on which the board expressly relied, or our decision in State ex rel Gonzalez v.

Aplanalp v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Board of Optometry

21 Or. App. 501 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1975

There are numerous Oregon cases which are contrary in principle to the Board’s position on this issue, e.g., McKee v. Foster, 219 Or 322 , 327 P2d 585 (1959), Mult. Co. Fair Assn. v. … Moore v. West Lawn Mem’l Park, 266 Or 244 , 512 P2d 1344 (1973).

J. L. Ward Co. v. Landscape Contractors Board

141 Or. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1996

Corp. v. Koitzsch, 135 Or App 524, 526 , 899 P2d 724 (1995). … In reviewing the Board’s interpretation of the statute, we examine the text of the statute, in context, and, if necessary, legislative history and other aids to construction. PGE v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Holmes

290 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1980

The Trial Board, one member dissenting, found the Accused not guilty of both charges. The Disciplinary Review Board disagreed. It found the Accused guilty of both charges and recommended that he be reprimanded. … Both the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found the Accused not guilty of that charge.

Martin v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

77 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 1986

He relies on Brown v. Jeld Wen, Inc., 52 Or App 191 , 627 P2d 1291 (1981). … As we said in Alvarez v. GAB Business Services, 72 Or App 524, 527 , 696 P2d 1131 (1985): “The Board correctly refused to exercise hindsight in determining whether the claim was prematurely closed.

Cunningham v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

155 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1998

At a 1996 hearing, the board upheld the judicially imposed minimum sentence and denied parole. … established by the board under its rules.”

Mooney v. Legacy Health

349 Or. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2026

cervical condition involving a spinal fusion and Brown-Sequard Syndrome. … C6-7, effective November 6, 2019.” 38 Mooney v.

Brune v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

44 Or. App. 449 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1980

Minsinger et al v. U. S. Nat. Bank et al, 228 Or 218 , 364 P2d 615 (1961). … Proponents of the will in Price relied on Minsinger v.

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

168 Or. App. 700 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 2000

Petitioner argues that the result of the rule is that no Board order is truly final. … determination of the issues before the Board.

Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

151 Or. App. 267 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 1997

The Board responds that the order is moot and therefore not justiciable, because on June 10, 1996, petitioner completed the sanction imposed. See Barcik v. … See State v. Noble, 307 Or 506 , 770 P2d 57 (1989) (where Board of Parole overrode minimum sentence, appeal challenging propriety of minimum sentence was moot); State v.

Price v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

73 Or. App. 123 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 10, 1985

Norgard v. Rawlinsons, 30 Or App 999, 1003 , 569 P2d 49 (1977). … Mazama Plywood Co. v. Beattie, 62 Or App 355 , 661 P2d 109 (1983).

Lee v. Lee

5 Or. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 1971

Crawford v. Crane et ux, Hughes, 204 Or 60 , supra, involved an appeal from a summary judgment pursuant to ORS 9.370 (2). … Garner v. Garner, 182 Or 549, 562-63 , 189 P2d 397 (1948). Taylor v.

Haynes v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

271 Or. App. 578 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 2015

PER CURIAM Pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 255-062-0021(2)(c)(C), part of a rule of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that governs requests for interim hearings when the board … See AFSCME Local 2623 v.

Board of Commissioners v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

29 Or. App. 909 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1977

This is an appeal by the Board of Commissioners of Coos Comity (County) from an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC).