Case law

Holt v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County

205 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1951

In Baldwin v. … Stevenson v. Friend, 196 Okla. 249 , 165 P. 2d 133 . Crews v. Garber, 188 Okla. 570 , 111 P. 2d 1080 .

Brown-Bellows Const. Co. v. Marcum

195 Okla. 363 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1945

In Protho v. Nette and Pine Valley Lumber Co. v. … We held in Dover Oil Co. v.

News-Dispatch Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of Com'rs

61 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1916

Board v. Watson, 7 Okla. 174 , 54 Pac. 441 ; Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. State, 26 Okla. 559 , 110 Pac. 373 ; Allen v. Board, 28 Okla. 773 , 116 Pac. 175 . … In the case of the Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v.

Sherrill v. Board of Comr's of Stephens County

191 Okla. 373 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1942

Parker v. Board of County Commissioners, 187 Okla. 308 , 102 P. 2d 880 . Affirmed. WELCH, C. J., and GIBSON, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and BAYLESS, JJ., absent.

Roberts v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, FIREMEN'S RELIEF & PENSION FUND

292 P.2d 408 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 17, 1956

Firemen’s Relief and Pension Board of City of Holdenville v. Lucas, 189 Okl. 328 , 117 P.2d 112 . … In the case of Hutchinson v. Pratt, 11 Vt. 402, 421 , applying the principles enunciated in Bank of United States v.

Peterson v. State

86 Okla. Crim. 302 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1948

Defendant was charged with killing James Brown in Oklahoma City on May 18, 1947, “by beating the said James Brown on and about the head and body with a certain piece of 2-inch board, approximately 4 inches wide and 6 feet … He at that time had the board above described in his hand. Brown came out of the door with a broom in his hands, and was running from the defendant.

Vandervoort v. Board of Comrs. of Pawnee Co.

8 Okla. 703 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

Thie rule laid down in the case of Hoffman v. Board of Com’rs., this volume, p. 225, followed. For the reasons herein stated, the petition in error must therefore be dismissed.

Beaman v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln Co.

25 Okla. 673 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1910

Second, if the board has no such authority, has plaintiff an adequate remedy at law? … The exercise of the power was left to the discretion of the board.

Clegg v. Board of Com'rs of Pawnee County

28 Okla. 470 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1911

Fullerton v. Board of Com'rs of Comanche County

126 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1927

MASON, V. C. J. The plaintiff in error, P. G. … S. 1921, provides that the salaries of all county officers, their clerks and deputies, shall be paid monthly, out of the county treasury, by order of the board of ecunty commissioners.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Board of County Com'rs

178 Okla. 484 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1936

Board of County Commissioners v. Constitutional Delegate Convention

18 Okla. 707 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1907

.: This was an action brought in the district court of Logan county, by the board of county commissioners of Greer county, on the relation of Charles M. … The same questions were involved and fully considered in the ease of Frank Frantz, et al., v. G. E.

Zimmerman v. Board of Com'rs of Cimarron County

65 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 2, 1917

Warren Zimmerman made his application to the board of equalization of Cimarron county to have the assessed valuation of his lands equalized and reduced. … All the questions urged by plaintiff in error have been decided adversely to his contention by this court in the case of Boone v.

Stillwater Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Savings & Loan Board

534 P.2d 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 1, 1975

Whittle v. … It is merely to decide whether the administrative fact finding is ‘clearly erroneous.’ ” In Board of Examiners of Veterinary Medicine v.

Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. Board of Equalization

185 Okla. 575 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1939

The board refused to strike the property from the assessment roll, and on appeal to the district court said court affirmed the order of the board of equalization. … The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order affirming the order refusing to strike heretofore entered by the board and to enter an order directing the board of equalization to strike

T.L.I. ex rel. Irick v. Board of County Commissioners

376 P.3d 930 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 11, 2015

Flesner, 1909 OK 137, ¶ 8 , 24 Okla. 47 , 103 P. 1016, 1020 , (quoting Williamson v. Brown, 15 N.Y. 354 (N.Y.1857), the Court defined and explained actual and constructive notice. … DeWeese v.

Board of Education of City of Nowata v. McCracken

62 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1917

Hudson v. Ely et al., 36 Okla. 576 , 129 Pac. 11 ; Garnett v. Goldman, 39 Okla. 516 , 135 Pac. 410 ; Smock v. Farmers’ Union State Bank, 22 Okla. 826 , 98 Pac. 945 ; Arthur v. … Board of Com’rs, etc., 43 Okla. 174 , 141 Pac. 1 ; Ratliff v. Cornelius, 49 Okla. 91 , 151 Pac. 675 .

Broadwell v. Board of Com'rs of Sequoyah County

86 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1922

V. Blaekard, county clerk of Se-quoyah county, filed his transcript of said appeal with the court clerk of the district court. … In the case of Board of Com’rs of Comanche County v.

Fuchs v. Oklahoma State Board of Pharmacy

74 O.B.A.J. 2458 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 17, 2003

Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists of the State of Oklahoma, 1996 OK 41 , 913 P.2d 1339 ; Mills v. New Mexico State Board of Psychologist Examiners, 1997-NMSC-028 , 123 N.M. 421 , 941 P.2d 502 . … Count V; 1.

Presbyterian Hospital, Inc. v. Board of Tax-Roll Corrections

58 O.B.A.J. 3115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1984

FNB filed an application for correction of the assessment and for refund of the 1978 tax before the Oklahoma County board of tax roll corrections (board). The board denied the request. … Eakin v. Chapman, 44 Okl. 51 , 143 P. 21 (1914). See also Wade v.