Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.96s
50 F.3d 1071 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1995
Because the ICA and the Staggers Rail Act are not the Board’s governing statutes, but rather are administered by the Commission, Society of Plastics Indus., Inc. v. … V 1993). 14 . The Board did not assist in the detection or resolution of this difference.
Cited 12 timesPublishedSears, Roebuck & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
346 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 1972
Tennessean Newspapers, Inc. v. F.H.A., 464 F.2d 657 (6th Cir., 1972); Getman v. N. L. R. B., 450 F.2d 670, 672 (D.C.Cir. 1971). … American Mail Line, Ltd. v. Gulick, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 411 F.2d 696, 703 (1968).
Cited 3 timesPublishedLevi v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
167 F. App'x 225 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 2005
Williams v. … Inc. v. Hines, 995 F.2d 295, 299-300 (D.C.Cir.1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHinson v. National Transportation Safety Board
57 F.3d 1144 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1995
Administrator v. … See also Skidmore v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVenture v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
391 A.2d 269 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 23, 1978
Civil Aeronautics Board, supra, is also misplaced. Neither Braniff nor Outland v. … The Court in Civil Aeronautics Board v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedSmith v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
342 A.2d 356 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1975
See Nathanson v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 881, 884 (1972); District of Columbia v. Cahill, 60 App.D.C. 342 , 54 F.2d 453 (1931). … Petitioners also rely on Smith v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, C.A.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDaimlerChrysler Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
288 F.3d 434 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 2002
And in Metropolitan Edison Co. v. … s 158(a)(1); ILGWU v. Quality Mfg. Co., 420 U.S. 276, 280-81 (1975). The Board correctly found that the memorandum to Mr.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCzarra v. Board of Medical Supervisors
24 App. D.C. 251 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1904
Baldwin v. … . *259 In Com. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedComau, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
671 F.3d 1232 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 2012
“The Board cannot ‘ignore its own relevant precedent but must explain why it is not controlling.’ ” Manhattan Ctr. Studios, Inc. v. NLRB, 452 F.3d 813, 816 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (quoting B B & L, Inc. v. … NLRB v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDebruhl v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board
384 A.2d 421 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1978
Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of State of New Mexico, 353 U.S. 232, 238-39 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957). … Richardson v. Belcher, 404 U.S. 78, 84 , 92 S.Ct. 254 , 30 L.Ed.2d 231 (1971). This court has already noted, albeit in dictum, in Richards v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedGiri v. National Board of Medical Examiners
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2024
Sys. v. … See id. at 663–64 (distinguishing Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished680 A.2d 396 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1996
McRae v. … In Brown-Bey we cited as authority for that holding the opinion of the Eleventh Circuit in Whitehorn v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMcCarty Farms, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board
158 F.3d 1294 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1998
See, e.g., Union Pacific R.R. v. … We therefore affirm the decision of the Board.
Cited 12 timesPublishedRoss v. Merit Systems Protection Board
672 F.2d 896 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 20, 1981
672 F.2d 896 217 U.S.App.D.C. 362 Ross v. … Merit Systems Protection Board 79-2418 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 11/20/81 1 M.S.P.B. 2 AFFIRMED * * The judgment or order is accompanied by a Memorandum explanatory of the judgment.
Cited 0 timesPublishedShepherd v. Merit Systems Protection Board
672 F.2d 897 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1981
672 F.2d 897 217 U.S.App.D.C. 363 Shepherd v. Merit Systems Protection Board 81-1175 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 11/3/81 1 M.S.P.B. AFFIRMED
Cited 0 timesPublishedDoe v. National Transportation Safety Board
593 F.2d 1371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 1979
593 F.2d 1371 193 U.S.App.D.C. 217 Doe v. National Transportation Safety Board No. 77-2056 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/22/79 1 N.T.S.B. AFFIRMED
Cited 0 timesPublishedRahm v. National Transportation Safety Board
522 F.2d 1344 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 1975
522 F.2d 1344 173 U.S.App.D.C. 129 Rahm v. National Transportation Safety Board No. 74-1959 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 10/6/75 1 N.T.S.B. 2 AFFIRMED *
Cited 0 timesPublishedScepter, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
280 F.3d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 2002
v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 367 (1998). This "good-faith uncer- tainty" standard has since been revised by the Board. See Levitz Furniture Co. of the Pacific, Inc., 333 N.L.R.B. … Printing Div. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190, 198 (1991) (citing NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 (1962)).
Cited 9 timesPublishedBlakey v. Board of Com'rs of District of Columbia
177 A.2d 269 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1962
Section 5(a) of Part V, Traffic & Motor Vehicle Regulations for the District of Columbia, provides: “Notwithstanding any of the other provisions of this order, the Director of Motor Vehicles, after giving notice and opportunity … Snyder v. City and County of Denver, 123 Colo. 222 , 227 P.2d 341, 343 (1951). 4 . Patton v. People, 114 Colo. 534 , 168 P.2d 266 (1946).
Cited 3 timesPublishedWestern Maryland Employees' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
2 D.C. 144 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1935
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna