Case law

Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

629 So. 2d 647 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 27, 1993

Steadham v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 629 So.2d 645 (Ala.Civ.App.1992), should be read in conjunction with this opinion. We recite only those facts necessary to our discussion. … Davis v. Southern United Life Ins. Co., 494 So.2d 48 (Ala.1986); Eagerton v. Williams, 433 So.2d 436 (Ala.1983); Bagley v. City of Mobile, 352 So.2d 1115 (Ala.1977).” 537 So.2d at 497-98 .

Cochran v. Alabama Board of Medical Examiners

159 So. 3d 735 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 12, 2013

Thus,, he argues, the action of the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners (“the board”) in revoking his Alabama Controlled Substances Certificate was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. … Therefore, this court correctly determined that the revocation action initiated by the board was not barred by the doctrine of res judicata. APPLICATION OVERRULED.

Barnes v. Dale County Board of Equalization

283 Ala. 437 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 17, 1968

As Justice Stakely did in Hamilton v. … As was pointed out in Hamilton v.

Cassady v. Montgomery County Board of Education

496 So. 2d 764 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 3, 1986

Unlike the plaintiff in Smith v. … See, also, Selby v. Money , 403 So.2d 218 (Ala. 1981). AFFIRMED. TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Clipson v. State Board of Education

271 Ala. 160 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 8, 1960

Smith, President of Troy State College, the State Board of Education of Alabama, and the individual members of that Board. … Likewise in Keller v. State Board of Education of Alabama, 236 Ala. 400 , 183 So. 268 , a suit for declaratory judgment was filed by Dr.

Brown v. Commonwealth Nat. Life Ins. Co., Inc.

875 F. Supp. 800 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 7, 1995

Burns v. Windsor Insurance Co., 31 F.3d 1092, 1095 (11th Cir.1994). … Randol, 987 F.2d at 1551 ; see also, Smith v. Jefferson Pilot Life Ins.

Thompson v. Alabama State Milk Control Board

241 Ala. 100 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 27, 1941

Milk Control Board. … As was pointed out in the case of People v. Nebbia, 262 N.Y. 259 , 186 N.E. 694 ; Nebbia v. People of State of New York, 291 U.S. 502 , 54 S.Ct. 505 , 78 L.Ed. 940 , 89 A.L.R. 1469 , and in Franklin, v.

W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Crossley

230 Ala. 407 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 16, 1935

Brown & Sons Lbr. Co> v. Walter Crossley (Ala. Sup.) 161 So. 536 , this day decided. Affirmed. ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Vinegar Bend Lumber Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

129 Ala. 271 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1900

This was an action upon the common counts, brought by the Hamilton Brown Shoe Company, .a corporation., In the complaint the parties to the cause are styled as the “Hamilton Brown Shoe Co., a corporation, v. Noel E. … In subsequent pleading's, both by plaintiffs and defendants, the parties are styled in the captions of the pleadings as “Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.”

Dothan City Board of Education v. V.M.H.

660 So. 2d 1328 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 12, 1995

See Kerr v. State, 474 So.2d 142 (Ala. Crim.App.1984), rev’d on other grounds, Ex parte Kerr, 474 So.2d 145 (Ala.1985); McCrary v. … See Lee v.

W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Yarbrough

27 Ala. App. 229 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1936

Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Crossley, 230 Ala. 403 , 161 So. 536 . In the Crossley Case, supra, it appears that the Brown Lumber Company owned and operated a sawmill at Fayette, Ala., where it had its main office. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v.

Thompson, Weinman & Co. v. Board of Adjustment

275 Ala. 278 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 30, 1963

Nelson v. Donaldson, 255 Ala. 76 , 50 So.2d 244 ; Board of Zoning Adjustment for City of Lanett v. Boykin, 265 Ala. 504 , 92 So.2d 906 . … It is also true that the power of the Board of Adjustment is not restricted to a grant of a variance with slight modifications (Nelson v.

Brown v. Kijakazi

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Oct 28, 2021

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION LILLIE BROWN, … in accordance with Bergen v. Comm’r of Soc.

Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Owen

54 Ala. App. 419 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 5, 1975

In Tri-State Corp. v. State ex rel. … First National Bank of Linden v. Alston, 231 Ala. 348 , 165 So. 241 ; State ex rel. Toberman v. Cook, 365 Mo. 274 , 281 S.W.2d 777 ; Eck v.

Oliver v. Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board

261 Ala. 234 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 27, 1954

This case pertains to matters considered in the cases of Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board v. Dean, Ala.Sup., 69 So.2d *236 704, and Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board v. Sullivan, Ala.Sup., 69 So.2d 709 . … City of Bessemer v. Whaley, 187 Ala. 525 , 65 So. 542 ; City of Birmingham v. Carle, 191 Ala. 539 , 68 So. 22 , L.R.A.1915F, 797; City of Bessemer v. Barnett, 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; City of Birmingham v.

Carr v. Montgomery County Board of Education

289 F. Supp. 647 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 2, 1968

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). … It has been almost fourteen years since school boards were placed under an affirmative duty to disestablish their dual school systems based upon race. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, supra.

Holloway v. Personnel Board of Jefferson County

528 So. 2d 341 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 1, 1988

See City of Birmingham v. Jefferson County Personnel Board, 468 So.2d 181 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). … Peseau v. Civil Service Board, 385 So.2d 1310, 1315 (Ala.Civ.App.), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 1316 (Ala.1980). Our review indicates that the employee was clearly given such due process requisites.

Lee v. MacOn County Board of Education

267 F. Supp. 458 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 22, 1967

It is quite clear that the defendants have abrogated, and openly continue to abrogate, their affirmative duty to effectuate the principles of Brown v. Board of Education, supra. … See, e. g., Franklin v. Barbour County Board of Education, 259 F.Supp. 545 (MD Ala.1906); Harris v. Crenshaw County Board of Education, 259 F.Supp. 107 (MD Ala.1966); Carr v.

Craig v. Selma City School Board

801 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Aug 25, 1992

Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 220-21 , 102 S.Ct. 2382, 2396 , 72 L.Ed.2d 786 (1982), citing San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1, 35 , 93 S.Ct. 1278, 1298 , 36 L.Ed.2d 16 (1973). Brown v. … Moreover, the plaintiffs’ brief argues that the Board’s offer to allow Sametra Peasant, Sonya Brown, and Tonya Brown to participate in an alternative punishment scheme violated those students’ federal due process rights.

Montgomery County Board of Education v. Addison

3 So. 3d 885 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 15, 2008

Smith[ v. Clark, 468 So.2d 138 (Ala.1985) ].” Ex parte Pate, 673 So.2d at 428-29 . Because service was not perfected upon the Board, the default judgment entered against the Board is void. … Colvin v. Colvin, 628 So.2d 802, 803 (Ala.Civ.App.1993). Cf.