Case law

Oregon Environmental Council v. Oregon State Board of Education

307 Or. 30 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1988

Pharmacy Bd. v. Va. … price of prescription drugs); see also Board of Education v.

State Land Board v. United States National Bank

213 Or. 368 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1958

When the estate was previously before us (In the *370 Matter of the Estate of Peter Lappy, Deceased, State Land Board v. … and that the State Land Board of the State of Oregon claims an escheat in this estate.

Silsby v. Strong

38 Or. 36 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1900

Brown as a witness, who testified that he was a member of the board of trustees of the Elmer-Brown Copper Mining & Smelting Company, and produced *39 the minutes of the first meeting of the stockholders and of the board of … It is insisted that the board meeting which authorized the execution of the deed was illegal, because R. A. Brown was not personally present thereat, leaving the board without a quorum to transact business.

Severy v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

347 Or. 42 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 2009

217 P.3d 688 (2009) 347 Or. 42 SEVERY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S057516). Supreme Court of Oregon. September 17, 2009. Petition for review allowed.

Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of County Commissioners

278 Or. App. 472 · Yamhill County Circuit Court, Oregon · May 25, 2016

However, as we explained in Kleikamp v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 57, 59-60 , 246 P3d 56 (2010), Measure 37 “was controversial. … See Biggerstaff v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 46, 48 , 245 P3d 688 (2010).

Scenic Sites, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

27 Or. App. 831 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 1976

On May 13, 1975, the board accepted the commission’s recommendations with slight modifications. 2 The circuit court upheld the essence of the board’s order, 3 and this appeal followed. … Duddles v. City Council of West Linn, 21 Or App 310, 328 , 535 P2d 583 , Sup Ct review denied (1975). We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Remanded with directions.

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

188 Or. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 29, 2003

The board’s interpretation of its rules is consistent with their wording and, thus, it is plausible. Accordingly, we defer to that interpretation on review. See Don’t Waste Oregon Com. v. … See also Rodriguez v. Board of Parole, 187 Or App 282, 293-94 , 67 P3d 970 (2003) (petitioner need show only one substantial question of law to prevail on motion for leave to proceed).

Forelaws on Board v. Energy Facility Siting Council

84 Or. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 1987

This court, however, must ‘discern and declare the intent of the legislature’ [citing Whipple v. Howser, 291 Or 475, 479 , 632 P2d 782 (1981)].” … See, e.g., Gregg v. Racing Commission, 38 Or App 19, 24-25 , 588 P2d 1290 , rev den 286 Or 637 (1979).

Boyd v. Board of Parole

338 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON SHANE ALLEN BOYD, Petitioner, v. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Boxberger v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1993

See Hayes v. Board of Parole, 115 Or App 36 , 836 P2d 767 (1992). In addition, the victims were not simply under 12 years of age, they were substantially younger than 12. As we explained in Jarvis v. … Jarvis v. State Board of Parole, supra, 96 Or App at 325 . The Board did that. Affirmed.

Board of Trustees v. Oregon Consistory No. 1

103 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1922

persons, constituting a board called the Board of School Trustees, to the corporation known as the Board of School Trustees. … By the recitals written in the deed signed by Bishop Morris, he and those in privity with him are estopped from denying that he possessed an estate more restricted than the one recited: Bayley v. McCoy, 8 Or. 262 .

Glasser v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 610 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

At the time of petitioner’s crime, OAR 255-40-025 permitted the Board to reduce a prison term by up to 20 percent. Jeldness v. … He argues that that is apparent from the fact that the Board did not alter the amount of his sentence reduction on rehearing. In Rise v.

Oregon Shipbuilding Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

49 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 3, 1943

United States v. Morgan, Administratrix, 313 U.S. 409, 421, 422 , 61 S.Ct. 999 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 . Inland Steel Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 109 F.2d 9 ; Berkshire Employees Association of Berkshire Knitting Mills v. National Labor Relations Board, 3 Cir., 121 F.2d 235 . M & M Wood Working Co. v.

Palacios v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

132 Or. App. 243 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 4, 1995

See Roof v. Board of Parole, 85 Or App 188 , 736 P2d 193 (1987); Hill v. Board of Parole, 85 Or App 215 , 735 P2d 1301 (1987). … Williams v. Board of Parole, supra, 112 Or App at 113 .

Aplanalp v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Board of Optometry

21 Or. App. 501 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1975

There are numerous Oregon cases which are contrary in principle to the Board’s position on this issue, e.g., McKee v. Foster, 219 Or 322 , 327 P2d 585 (1959), Mult. Co. Fair Assn. v. … Moore v. West Lawn Mem’l Park, 266 Or 244 , 512 P2d 1344 (1973).

Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

126 Or. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 1994

However, we considered and rejected the same argument in our opinion on reconsideration in Jeldness v. … The Board did not err in doing so. The Board’s order granting petitioner a six-month reduction in his prison term was proper. Affirmed. In Smith v.

Griffin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

201 Or. App. 21 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 2005

Wilkinson v. Austin, _ US _, 125 S Ct 2384 , 162 L Ed 2d 174 (2005); Davis v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 200 Or App 366 , 114 P3d 1138 (2005). As we noted in Hamel v. … Erbs v.

Burton v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

31 Or. App. 1045 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 1977

Petitioner’s license to practice dentistry was suspended for six months upon a determination by the Board of Dental Examiners that he had referred a patient to a dental laboratory for the fitting of a denture, in other words … Regarding sanction, see, Mary’s Fine Food, Inc. v. OLCC, 30 Or App 435 , 567 P2d 146 rev pending (1977). There being no other challenges to the order, it is affirmed. Affirmed.

South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of Commissioners

28 Or. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 1977

Evidently, the questions could be responded to or ignored as the board members pleased. … However, at the least the plaintiffs were given an opportunity to draw the board’s attention to their objections * * 27 Or App at 663-64. They are correct.

Coldiron v. BOARD OF COM'RS FOR CURRY CTY.

39 Or. App. 495 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 1979

Fritz v. OSP, 30 Or App 1117 , 569 P2d 654 , (1977); Withrow v. Larkin, 421 US 35 , 95 S Ct 1456 , 43 L Ed 2d 712 (1975); Hortonville Dist. v. Hortonville Ed. … Hortonville Dist. v. Hortonville Ed. Assn., supra; Gregg v.