Case law

Board of County Commissioners v. Constitutional Delegate Convention

18 Okla. 707 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1907

.: This was an action brought in the district court of Logan county, by the board of county commissioners of Greer county, on the relation of Charles M. … The same questions were involved and fully considered in the ease of Frank Frantz, et al., v. G. E.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF POLICE PENSION, ETC v. Burns

348 P.2d 1067 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 29, 1959

This Court denied recovery in Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund v. … Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of City of Tulsa v.

Mahr v. Board of County Com'rs of Pottawatomie County

26 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

In Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County v. … No. 89 v. Shelton, infra, 109 Pac. 67 .

Zimmerman v. Board of Com'rs of Cimarron County

65 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 2, 1917

Warren Zimmerman made his application to the board of equalization of Cimarron county to have the assessed valuation of his lands equalized and reduced. … All the questions urged by plaintiff in error have been decided adversely to his contention by this court in the case of Boone v.

State Ex Rel. Walcott v. Brown

111 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1925

The transaction between Brown and Cook, and between Cook and the Central State Bank of Muskogee, was made before Brown became cashier and before his bond was executed. … Crowder State Bank v. Aetna Power Co., 41 Okla. 394 , 138 Pac. 302 ; First State Bank of Ada v. Wowack, 56 Okla. 359 , 156 Pac. 207 ; Bennett v. Gage, 74 Okla. 69 176 Pac. 744 .

Pease v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS, OSAGE COUNTY

550 P.2d 565 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1976

See Rollow v. West, 479 P.2d 962 (Okl.1971). The statute does not provide a restriction on the duration of such an organization, only that the agreement shall specify its duration. … Blankenship v. Atoka County, 456 P.2d 537 (Okl.1967). INCOG is not a unit of state government. To the contrary it is formed to assist local communities and maintain local government.

Blankenship v. Board of Review, Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

486 P.2d 718 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1971

In Lanyon v. … In Wilson v.

Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. Board of Equalization

185 Okla. 575 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1939

The board refused to strike the property from the assessment roll, and on appeal to the district court said court affirmed the order of the board of equalization. … The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the order affirming the order refusing to strike heretofore entered by the board and to enter an order directing the board of equalization to strike

Board of Com'rs of Tulsa v. Co-Operative Publishing

104 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1924

Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

Board of Education of City of Nowata v. McCracken

62 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1917

Hudson v. Ely et al., 36 Okla. 576 , 129 Pac. 11 ; Garnett v. Goldman, 39 Okla. 516 , 135 Pac. 410 ; Smock v. Farmers’ Union State Bank, 22 Okla. 826 , 98 Pac. 945 ; Arthur v. … Board of Com’rs, etc., 43 Okla. 174 , 141 Pac. 1 ; Ratliff v. Cornelius, 49 Okla. 91 , 151 Pac. 675 .

State Ex Rel. Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of Corrections

614 P.2d 551 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1980

Regents of State University v. Trapp, 28 Okl. 83 , 113 P. 910 (1911), and Peebly v. … V, Okl. Const.

News Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs

177 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

the judgment and order overruling the motion for new trial in the district court of Adair county, in an action wherein the News Dispatch Printing & Audit Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, was plaintiff, and the board … This action was commenced in the district court of Adair county by the plaintiff, against the board of county commissioners of said county, to recover judgment on claims against said county for the amount of $1,262.32, due

Drolte v. Board of County Com'rs of Ellis County

176 Okla. 622 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1936

Williams, 38 Okla. 738 , 135 P. 420 ; In re Cleveland’s Claim, 72 Okla. 279 , 180 P. 852 ; Bass v. Board of County Com’rs, 97 Okla. 94 , 222 P. 995 ; and Board of County Com’rs of Coal County v. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

State Ex Rel. Board of Education of Independent School Dist. No. 19, Wagoner County v. State Board of Education

208 Okla. 390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1953

Bank v. Mills, 134 Okla. 186 , 272 P. 840 . … O’Neal v. Vose, 193 Okla. 451 , 145 P. 2d 411 .

Holtzen v. Tulsa County Board of Adjustment

75 O.B.A.J. 2713 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 4, 2004

Cotton v. … Constant v. Brown, 1941 OK 205, ¶ 8 , 114 P.2d 477, 478 ; see also Nucholls v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 1977 OK 3 , ¶ 11, 560 P.2d 556, 560 .

Home Insurance Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

619 P.2d 1276 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 12, 1980

This statute reads: “Whenever any allowance, either in whole or in part, is made upon any claim presented to the Board of County Commissioners and is accepted by the person making the claim, such allowance shall be a full

Hallman v. County Election Board of Oklahoma Cty.

509 P.2d 459 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1973

However, the shortness of time should not preclude an election board from determining the qualifications of a candidate for a municipal office. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and BERRY, HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

Board of Com'rs. of Harper County v. Day

46 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

The precise question is stated in defendant in error’s brief as follows: “Said petition did, not allege that the board of county commissioners were petitioned by the township board to open and establish a public road, and … However, it is manifest that, when the board’s action is invoked in either of these methods, it becomes the duty of the board to determine the fact of "public necessity,” for the act says “the county commissioners shall in

Board of Comrs. of Roger Mills Co. v. Rowden

8 Okla. 406 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

.: This was an action brought in the district court of Roger Mills county on July 12, 1897, by Sat Rowden, defendant in error, against the board of commissioners of Roger Mills county, plaintiff in error, to *407 recover … This case comes clearly within the principle announced in the case of Board of Com’rs of Roger Mills Co. v.

Brown v. Prieto

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 23, 2021

N.M. 2017) (citing Board of Trustees v. Bucci, (In re Bucci), 493 F.3d 635, 644 (6th Cir. 2007);Transamerica Commercial Finance Corp. v. … V.