Case law

Doe v. National Transportation Safety Board

593 F.2d 1371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 1979

593 F.2d 1371 193 U.S.App.D.C. 217 Doe v. National Transportation Safety Board No. 77-2056 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 2/22/79 1 N.T.S.B. AFFIRMED

Rahm v. National Transportation Safety Board

522 F.2d 1344 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 1975

522 F.2d 1344 173 U.S.App.D.C. 129 Rahm v. National Transportation Safety Board No. 74-1959 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 10/6/75 1 N.T.S.B. 2 AFFIRMED *

Scepter, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

280 F.3d 1053 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 2002

v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 367 (1998). This "good-faith uncer- tainty" standard has since been revised by the Board. See Levitz Furniture Co. of the Pacific, Inc., 333 N.L.R.B. … Printing Div. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190, 198 (1991) (citing NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 (1962)).

Keith v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

284 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2003

(citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Bayer v. United States Dept. of the Treasury, 956 F.2d 330, 332 (D.C.Cir.1992)); Cristwell v. … Individuals “who fail[] to comply, to the letter, with administrative deadlines ‘ordinarily will be denied a judicial audience.’ ” Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting Shehadeh v.

Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2024

To begin, the Board’s ban on expressive activities on the eastern steps is troublingly overinclusive. See Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of N.Y. … See Brown v. Ent. Merchs.

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

568 F.3d 236 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 2009

In so ruling, we acknowledged the holding of Darby v. … See, e.g., United States v. L.A. Tucker Truck Lines, 344 U.S. 33, 35–37 (1953); Appalachian Power Co. v. EPA, 251 F.3d 1026, 1036 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Mediation Board

194 F. Supp. 3d 106 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2016

See Ark Initiative v. Tidwell, 816 F.3d 119, 126-27 (D.C. … See, e.g., Edelstein v. City & Cty. of San Francisco, 56 P.3d 1029, 1041 (Cal. 2002) (citing Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428, 438 (1992)).

Ferriso v. National Labor Relations Board

125 F.3d 865 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 23, 1997

Hudson, 475 U.S. at 305 (quoting Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209, 244 (1977) (Ste- vens, J., concurring)). … See Gwirtz v.

Community Hospitals v. National Labor Relations Board

335 F.3d 1079 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2003

Tradesmen Int’l, Inc. v. NLRB, 275 F.3d 1137, 1141 (D.C.Cir.2002). Questions of law we review with deference to the Board’s expertise. NLRB v. … Moreover, the Board’s decision is in accord with precedent. See Asseo v.

Porterfield v. Army Review Board Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 6, 2019

See Brown v. Mattis, No. 16-cv-1025, 2018 WL 6433754, at *5 (D.D.C. Dec. 7, 2018), appeal docketed sub nom. Brown v. Shanahan, No. 18- 5382 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 31, 2018). … See, e.g., Voinche v. Obama, 744 F.

Schaeff Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

113 F.3d 264 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 1997

We reject the Board’s factual findings only if they are not supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. See Universal Camera Corp. v. … Schaeff and the Board dispute the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Office of Workers' Compensation v.

Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

770 A.2d 79 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2001

Carr Mgm’t, Inc. v. National Delicatessen, Inc., 397 A.2d 914, 915 (D.C.1979). … See Fleming v. District of Columbia, 633 A.2d 846, 848 (D.C.1993)(motion is not determined by its label or caption); accord, Allstate Ins. Co. v. Robinson, 645 A.2d 591, 593 (D.C.1994). II.

Russell v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

402 A.2d 1231 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1979

Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 398 A.2d 13, 15 (1979), quoting Stewart v. … Palmer, supra at 542 ; see also Taylor v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 308 A.2d 230 (1973); Salsbery v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C. App., 357 A.2d 402 (1976). 9 .

Schonberger v. National Transportation Safety Board

672 F.2d 896 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 1, 1981

672 F.2d 896 217 U.S.App.D.C. 362 Schonberger v. … National Transportation Safety Board 81-1442 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/1/81 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED * * The judgment or order is accompanied by a Memorandum explanatory of the judgment.

Elam v. National Labor Relations Board

395 F.2d 611 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 8, 1968

Collins Baking Co. v. NLRB, 193 F.2d 483, 486 (5th Cir. 1951). … The decision and order of the Board, including that of the Examiner insofar as adopted by the Board, are reported at 165 NLRB No. 8 (1967). . NLRB v.

Carson v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board

534 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2008

Pro se petitioner Joseph Carson brings this lawsuit against the United States Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB” or the “Board”) seeking a writ of mandamus “directing] MSPB to conduct the necessary reviews of [the Office … See Fornaro v. James, 416 F.3d 63, 67 (D.C.Cir.2005) (CSRA is comprehensive and exclusive remedial scheme); Carducci v.

Indiana Boxcar Corporation v. Railroad Retirement Board

712 F.3d 590 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 2013

See FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009). … Until now, the Board used the definition of “common control” found in Union Pacific, a Federal Circuit case. Union Pacific Corp. v. United States, 5 F.3d 523 (Fed.

Smith v. Quick

680 A.2d 396 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1996

McRae v. … In Brown-Bey we cited as authority for that holding the opinion of the Eleventh Circuit in Whitehorn v.

William Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board, Roscoe Quincy Proctor v. Subversive Activities Control Board

332 F.2d 317 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1964

Communist Party v. SACB, 367 U.S. at 109 , 81 S.Ct. at 1417 . See Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886). Compare Communist Party v. SACB, 96 U.S.App. … See National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc. v. SACB, 116 U.S.App. D.C. 162, 322 F.2d 375, 392 (1963); Weinstock v. SACB, 118 U.S.App.D.C. •-, 331 F.2d 76 (concurring opinion); Flynn v.

Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police Board

338 F. Supp. 2d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2004

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Capitol Police Board, Civ. No. 02-1859; Fields v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, Civ. No. 02-1346; Ross v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, Civ. No. 02-2481; Fields v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, Civ.