Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.03s
Williams v. BOARD OF WATER & SEWER COM'RS
763 So. 2d 938 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 17, 1999
*Page 943 Hooper, C.J., and Maddox, Houston, Cook, See, Lyons, Brown, and Johnstone, JJ., concur. 1 The City of Prichard is not a party to these appeals. … Thus, as this Court noted in Sheridan v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDyer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment & Appeals
45 Ala. App. 696 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 10, 1970
Arant v. Board of Adjustment of City of Montgomery, supra; and Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Mountain Brook v. Wright, 283 Ala. 654 , 220 So.2d 261 . … Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished4 Stew. & P. 96 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1833
In this case, the declaration v/as filed at the term to which the writ was reta raed agrinut both defendants, and at each, succeeding term, down to the one at which the final judgment was rendered, the cause was regularly … That the real estate, so *111 conveyed, v. as. afterward:!
Cited 2 timesPublishedGholston v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
627 So. 2d 945 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 28, 1993
Code 1975, § 41-22-3 (3), excludes actions of the Board from its provisions for judicial review. See also, Sellers v. State , 586 So.2d 994 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991). In Ellard v. … Ellard v. Alabama Board of Pardons Paroles , 928 F.2d 378 (11th Cir. 1991)). Here, as in Ellard v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSparks v. Regional Medical Center Board
792 F. Supp. 735 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 12, 1992
See Robinson v. … See also Bell v.
Cited 19 timesPublished200 Ala. 700 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 28, 1917
Affirmed on the authority of Rogers v. White, 14 Ala. App. 482 , 70 South. 994 . All the Justices concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHuntsville City Board of Education v. Sharp
137 So. 3d 917 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 3, 2013
Richardson had not conferred with John Brown, the Board’s Director of Maintenance, Facilities, Construction, Transportation, and Safety, regarding Brown’s opposition to the termination of all the mechanics in the Board’s … See Huntsville City Bd. of Educ. v. Stranahan, 130 So.3d 204, 206 (Ala.Civ.App.2013); Huntsville City Bd. of Educ. v. Frasier, 122 So.3d 193, 201 (Ala.Civ.App.2013); and Board of Sch. Comm’rs of Mobile Cnty. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedClayton v. Board of School Commissioners
552 So. 2d 155 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 7, 1989
Our judgment affirmed Case No. 6052, Clayton v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, and reversed Case No. 6210, Day v. Southwest State Technical College.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJackson v. Geneva County Board of Education
160 So. 3d 1227 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 29, 2014
Cited 0 timesPublishedLovett v. Mobile Housing Board
267 Ala. 150 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 23, 1958
Reversed and remanded on authority of Harris v. Mobile Housing Board, ante, p. 147, 100 So.2d 719 , this day decided. Reversed and remanded. LAWSON, GOODWYN, and MERRILL, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLambert v. Escambia County Board of Education
199 So. 3d 772 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 8, 2016
Cited 1 timesPublishedDothan City Board of Education v. V.M.H.
660 So. 2d 1328 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 12, 1995
See Kerr v. State, 474 So.2d 142 (Ala. Crim.App.1984), rev’d on other grounds, Ex parte Kerr, 474 So.2d 145 (Ala.1985); McCrary v. … See Lee v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedThompson, Weinman & Co. v. Board of Adjustment
275 Ala. 278 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 30, 1963
Nelson v. Donaldson, 255 Ala. 76 , 50 So.2d 244 ; Board of Zoning Adjustment for City of Lanett v. Boykin, 265 Ala. 504 , 92 So.2d 906 . … It is also true that the power of the Board of Adjustment is not restricted to a grant of a variance with slight modifications (Nelson v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWefel v. W. P. Brown & Son Lumber Co.
58 F.2d 667 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · May 14, 1932
Robertson, v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U. S. 619 , 45 S. Ct. 621 , 69 L. Ed. 1119 . … In McCullough v. United Grocers’ Corp. (D.
Cited 1 timesPublishedThompson v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
806 So. 2d 374 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 2001
806 So.2d 374 (2001) Willie THOMPSON, Sr., et al. v. BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al. 1001114. Supreme Court of Alabama. June 15, 2001. *375 Willie Thompson, Sr., pro se. Gregory O. … Section 15-22-26 is a typical parole statute that gives the parole board total discretion in the granting of paroles. Tedder v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedNelson v. Etowah County Board of Education
607 So. 2d 1257 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 1, 1991
Greene v. Thompson, 554 So.2d 376 (Ala.1989). … Ass’n v. Board of Trustees, 374 So.2d 258 (Ala.1979); State Tax Comm’n v. Board of Educ., 235 Ala. 388 , 179 So. 197 (1938).
Reversed by Nelson v. Etowah County Board of Education, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 594 (1992)Cited 4 timesPublishedCivitans Care, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment
437 So. 2d 540 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 4, 1983
a family home; Carroll v. … Luke Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Zoning Hearing Board , 43 Pa.
Cited 10 timesPublishedAlabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Owen
54 Ala. App. 419 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 5, 1975
In Tri-State Corp. v. State ex rel. … First National Bank of Linden v. Alston, 231 Ala. 348 , 165 So. 241 ; State ex rel. Toberman v. Cook, 365 Mo. 274 , 281 S.W.2d 777 ; Eck v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOliver v. Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board
261 Ala. 234 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 27, 1954
This case pertains to matters considered in the cases of Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board v. Dean, Ala.Sup., 69 So.2d *236 704, and Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board v. Sullivan, Ala.Sup., 69 So.2d 709 . … City of Bessemer v. Whaley, 187 Ala. 525 , 65 So. 542 ; City of Birmingham v. Carle, 191 Ala. 539 , 68 So. 22 , L.R.A.1915F, 797; City of Bessemer v. Barnett, 212 Ala. 202 , 102 So. 23 ; City of Birmingham v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedState v. Board of Revenue & Road Commissioners
73 Ala. 65 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1882
That which pertained to the whole line was- required to be assessed by the State Auditor, assisted, as a board of equalization, by other State executive officers. … —Pollard v. Zuber, 65 Ala. 628 ; State Auditor v. Jackson County, Ib. 142; Maguire v. Road Commissioners, 71 Ala. 401 . The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna