Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

3.66s

  • School District No. 48 v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

    14 Or. App. 634 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 8, 1973

    Ward v. Ore. State Board of Nursing, 266 Or 128 , 510 P2d 554 (1973); Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601 , 378 P2d 558 , 96 ALR2d 529 (1963); Board of Medical Examiners v. … See Maeder Steel Products Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • DeCosta v. State Board of Parole

    288 Or. 515 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1980

    *517 MEMORANDUM OPINION The Court of Appeals allowed respondent’s motion to dismiss this case based upon the previous decision by that Court in Harris v. … Board of Parole, 39 Or App 913 , 593 P2d 1292 (1979), a similar case. Since then this Court has reversed the decision of that Court in Harris and remanded that case to it. 288 Or 495 , 605 P2d 1181 (1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marsh v. State Board of Parole

    33 Or. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 1, 1978

    Bonney v. OSP, 270 Or 79 , 526 P2d 1020 (1974); Sterling v. Bd. of Parole, 16 Or App 481, 493 , 519 P2d 1047 , rev den (1974) (specially concurring opinion).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Board of Medical Examiners

    31 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1977

    Petitioner appeals from a decision of the Board of Medical Examiners (Board) revoking his license to practice medicine. … This contention was decided adversely to him in Board of Medical Examiners v. Mintz, 233 Or 441 , 378 P2d 945 (1963). We are bound by that decision.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Directors v. Employment Division

    28 Or. App. 783 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 1977

    This is a petition for review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) which granted claimant unemployment benefits. … ORS 183.482(8) (d); Wilton v. Employment Div., 26 Or App 549 , 553 P2d 1071 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

    28 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 1977

    This appeal from a denial of disability retirement benefits by the Public Employes’ Retirement Board (PERB) presents similar facts and identical legal issues to those in Hoskinson v. … Therefore, PERB did not err in failing to consider it and, as in Hoskinson , we will not interfere on review with the Board’s resolution of conflicting evidence. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whitaker v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

    25 Or. App. 569 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 1976

    The Board did not err in admitting the evaluation documents into evidence. See State v. Cappleman, 10 Or App 176 , 499 P2d 1372 (1972). Secondly, petitioner contends that the Board improperly admitted testimony from Dr. … See Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601 , 378 P2d 558 , 96 ALR2d 529 (1963); Von Weidlein/N. W. Bottling v. OLCC, 16 Or App 81 , 514 P2d 560 , 515 P2d 936 , 517 P2d 295, 300 (1973), Sup Ct review denied (1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Corgain v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    196 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 24, 2004

    Roy v. Palmateer, 194 Or App 330 , 95 P3d 1124 (2004).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seiber v. State Ex Rel. Board of Forestry

    210 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 2006

    See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 164 Or App 114, 128-33 , 991 P2d 563 (1999) (requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies before takings claim is ripe). … Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wagy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    146 Or. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1997

    Kessler v. Board of Parole, 145 Or App 584 , 931 P2d 801 (1997).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of School Trustees v. Morrison

    105 Or. 629 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1922

    If he did this, the board had no reason to complain: 14 C. J., § 1887; Cook on Corporations, § 652; Jameson v. Coldwell, 23 Or. 144 ( 31 Pac. 279 ); Stanley v. Luse, 36 Or. 25 ( 58 Pac. 75 ); Gam *641 ble v. … A. 527); Barr v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 57 Fed. 86 ( 6 C. C. A. 260 ); Figge v. Bergenthal, 130 Wis. 594 ( 109 N. W. 581 , 110 N. W. 798 ); Stetson v. Northern Inv. Co., 104 Iowa, 393 ( 73 N. W. 869 ); Battelle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Interiano v. SAIF

    315 Or. App. 588 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 2021

    Claimant asserts that “courts have never employed a ‘two medical problem’ legal analysis to establish the existence of a combined condition,” and that Brown v. … Brown, 361 Or at 251 (emphasis omitted); see also Hopkins v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Citizens' National Bank v. Baker County Board of Equalization

    109 Or. 669 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1924

    A hearing was had before the county board of equalization upon the petition of the bank, after which the board disallowed the petition. … In the case of Valley Investment Co. v. Board, 152 Iowa, 84 ( 131 N. W. 669), the Supreme Court of Iowa placed a construction upon analogous statutes of that state like that adopted by the Connecticut court.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • K-MART v. Evenson

    167 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2000

    Employer cites to our decisions in Brown v. SAIF, 79 Or App 205 , 717 P2d 1289 , rev den 301 Or 666 (1986), and Johnsen v. Hamilton Electric, 90 Or App 161 , 751 P2d 246 (1988), as supporting its position. … As we later explained, the decision in Brown merely stands for the proposition that “[t]he fact that one has sought medical services does not [alone] establish that one has a compensable injury.” Barkley v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fleming v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    346 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 2009

    211 P.3d 930 (2009) 346 Or. 361 FLEMING v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. (S057245). Supreme Court of Oregon. June 17, 2009. Petition for review allowed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown, Trustee v. Dept. of Rev.

    4 Or. Tax 266 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 28, 1970

    Portland Canning Co. v. Tax Com., 241 Or 109 , 404 P2d 236 (1965). This rule is not affected by the fact the property is under a parking lot lease with more than eight years yet to run.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Board of Bar Examiners v. Poyntz

    152 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1935

    No hearing was had, however, by the State Board of Bar Examiners and the petitioner had no opportunity to meet his accusers face to face to refute any charges which might be made against him, although he urged the board to … In fairness to the board, let it be said that no statutory procedure for such hearing was provided.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of Commissioners

    27 Or. App. 647 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 1976

    THE PROPER LEGAL STANDARDS In Green v. … If Green v.

    Reversed on other grounds by South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of Commissioners, 280 Or. 3 (1977)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Oregon Environmental Council v. Oregon State Board of Education

    307 Or. 30 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1988

    Pharmacy Bd. v. Va. … price of prescription drugs); see also Board of Education v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State Land Board v. United States National Bank

    213 Or. 368 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1958

    When the estate was previously before us (In the *370 Matter of the Estate of Peter Lappy, Deceased, State Land Board v. … and that the State Land Board of the State of Oregon claims an escheat in this estate.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.