Case law

Hinkle v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

197 Okla. 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1945

We are cited Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. City of Wewoka, 191 Okla. 142 , 127 P. 2d 826 , and its companion case, Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. … Board of Com’rs v. Shat-tuck, supra. However, the portion of the 1939 ad valorem he had indorsed was without effect, for under Shnier v. Vahlberg, supra, they were canceled by the 1940 resale.

Sherrill v. Board of Comr's of Stephens County

191 Okla. 373 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1942

Parker v. Board of County Commissioners, 187 Okla. 308 , 102 P. 2d 880 . Affirmed. WELCH, C. J., and GIBSON, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and BAYLESS, JJ., absent.

RICHARDS v. FOREMOST INSURANCE CO. v. BROWN & SON MOBILE HOME SVC, LLC

2026 OK 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2026

OSCN Found Document:RICHARDS v. FOREMOST INSURANCE CO. et al. v. BROWN & SON MOBILE HOME SVC, LLC et al. RICHARDS v. FOREMOST INSURANCE CO. et al. v. … Wood v. Mercedes-Benz of Oklahoma City , 2014 OK 68 336 P.3d 457 Harmon v. Cradduck, 2012 OK 80 286 P.3d 643 12 O.S.2021, § 2056 see also H2K Tech., Inc. v. WSP USA, Inc. , 2021 OK 59 503 P.3d 1177 Tiger v.

Wm. Cameron Co., Inc. v. Board of Equalization

87 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1922

This is an appeal from the action of the district court affirming the action of the board of equalization of Greer county in refusing to relieve the plaintiff in error from a penalty of $7,500 assessed against its taxable … The assessor shall return the sworn statement so made,. *299 with his assessment, to the board of equal: ization of the city, town or'township, wherein said corporation is located, and if it shall appear that the statement

Board of Cty. Comm. of Kay County v. Smith

47 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1915

BROWN, J. … In Howell v. Board of Co.

Fullerton v. Board of Com'rs of Comanche County

126 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 2, 1927

MASON, V. C. J. The plaintiff in error, P. G. … S. 1921, provides that the salaries of all county officers, their clerks and deputies, shall be paid monthly, out of the county treasury, by order of the board of ecunty commissioners.

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Board of County Com'rs

178 Okla. 484 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1936

Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Board

685 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1987

See Munro v. Socialist Workers Party, supra; Clements v. Fashing, supra; Storer v. Brown, supra; American Party of Texas v. White, 415 U.S. 767 , 94 S.Ct. 1296 , 39 L.Ed.2d 744 (1974); Jenness v. Fortson, supra. VII. … McBroom v. Brown, 53 Colo. 412 , 127 P. 957 (1912). .

Derieg v. Board of Education of Town of Carnegie

202 Okla. 577 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1950

Among these authorities are: Bridges v. Thomas, 8 Okla. 620 , 58 P. 955 ; Kilgore v. Lyle, 30 Okla. 596 , 120 P. 626 ; Etchen v. Ferguson, 59 Okla. 280 , 159 P. 306 ; McDowel v. King et al., 186 Okla. 90 , 96 P. 2d 37 . … In the case of Rose v.

Berry v. Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists

611 P.2d 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 25, 1980

of Oklahoma,” to bring an action for injunctive relief was acknowledged in Lamb v. … In Fosket v.

State v. County Election Board of Comanche County

180 Okla. 334 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 1937

On the 28th day of April, 1934, plaintiff filed a proceeding against the county election board of Comanche county, Okla., seeking a writ of mandamus to declare him the holder of an of Bce as councilman of the city council … We are of the opinion that this proceeding must be dismissed under the rule announced in Edwards v. Welch, 29 Okla. 335 , 116 P. 791 ; Hudson v. Moore, 169 Okla. 12 , 35 P. (2d) 886 ; Revard v.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF POLICE PENSION, ETC v. Burns

348 P.2d 1067 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 29, 1959

This Court denied recovery in Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund v. … Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of City of Tulsa v.

Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. ex rel. Zurich Insurance v. Brown

220 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Aug 7, 1963

See also Batson-Cook Company v. International Steel Erectors, (5 Cir.) 257 F.2d 410 ; Martin v. American Optical Company (5 Cir.) 184 F.2d 528 ; Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company et al. v. … In Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation v.

Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Empie

628 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1983

As one court put it, “[i]t would have been difficult for Congress to give the Bank Board a broader mandate.” Glendale Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. v. … As one court put it, “[i]t would have been difficult for Congress to give the Bank Board a broader mandate.” Glendale Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. v.

Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Stokes

207 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1952

In Bass v. Lincoln County, 97 Okla. 94 , 222 P. 995 , cited with approval in Drolte v. … Board of County Com’rs of Oklahoma County v. Beaty, 67 Okla. 281 , 171 P. 34 .

Board of Com'rs v. News-Dispatch Ptg. & Audit Co.

122 Okla. 107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co., 104 Okla. 260 , 231 Pac. 250 ; Board of County Com’rs v. Co-Operative Publishing Co., 104 Okla. 262 , 231 Pac. 251 : Edelmann v. … Board of County Com’rs and News-Dispatch Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of County Com’rs, supra.

State Ex Rel. Short v. State Board of Equalization

107 Okla. 118 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1924

Postel v. Marcues [Wis.] 152 N. W. 419 .) … City of Chicago v. Reeves (Ill.) 77 N. E. 237 : Warfield v. Vandever (Md.) 60 Atl. 538 ; Commonwealth v. Bowman (Ky.) 231 S. W. 35 ; Sims v. Sawyer (W. Va.) 101 S. E. 467 ; Johnson v.

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee Co. v. Dudding

62 Okla. 51 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1916

In Black et al. v. … Smith et al. v. Board Com’rs, 26 Okla. 819 , 110 Pac. 669 ; Fast et al. v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 289 , 119 Pac. 241 ; Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co., 32 Okla. 784 , 124 Pac. 324 ; Turner et al. v.

Alexander v. Board of Ed., Town of Carmen

161 Okla. 287 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1932

Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okla. 164 , 292 P. 15 . … Faught v. City of Sapulpa, supra.

State Ex Rel. Poulos v. State Board of Equalization

552 P.2d 1138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1976

*1139 ORDER Upon consideration of the “Plan of Compliance” filed by the State Board of Equalization January 7, 1976, and after consideration of oral and written arguments presented in support thereof and in opposition thereto … of Equalization to comply with its constitutional and statutory duties to adjust and equalize the valuation of real and personal property of all the counties of the State of Oklahoma. (3)That the Board shall satisfy its