Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.35s
1000 Friends of Oregon v. Board of County Commissioners
32 Or. App. 413 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1978
The following excerpts from the Board’s findings provide a focus for the issues raised by petitioners. … We held in Rutherford v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMarsh v. State Board of Parole
33 Or. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 1, 1978
Bonney v. OSP, 270 Or 79 , 526 P2d 1020 (1974); Sterling v. Bd. of Parole, 16 Or App 481, 493 , 519 P2d 1047 , rev den (1974) (specially concurring opinion).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Directors v. Employment Division
28 Or. App. 783 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 1977
This is a petition for review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) which granted claimant unemployment benefits. … ORS 183.482(8) (d); Wilton v. Employment Div., 26 Or App 549 , 553 P2d 1071 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMitchell v. Public Employes' Retirement Board
28 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 1977
This appeal from a denial of disability retirement benefits by the Public Employes’ Retirement Board (PERB) presents similar facts and identical legal issues to those in Hoskinson v. … Therefore, PERB did not err in failing to consider it and, as in Hoskinson , we will not interfere on review with the Board’s resolution of conflicting evidence. Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCarlock v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
117 Or. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1992
Noren v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 117 Or App 337 , 843 P2d 1021 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHibbard v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
327 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1998
The order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision is vacated. The case is remanded to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision for further consideration in light of Noble v. … Board of Parole, 327 Or 485 , 964 P2d 990 (1998).
Cited 1 timesPublishedWagy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
146 Or. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1997
Kessler v. Board of Parole, 145 Or App 584 , 931 P2d 801 (1997).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Dec 3, 2019
No. 3:18-cv-005 10-MK v. ORDER STEVE BROWN, Superintendent, Respondent. MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. … United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9" Cir. 1988). The Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 33) is adopted.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFowler v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
65 Or. App. 347 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 9, 1983
Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to his understanding of the requirements of Anders v. … See, e.g., State v. Horine, supra; State v. Kennedy, 64 Or App 556 , 669 P2d 807 (1983). Motion to withdraw as counsel denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of School Trustees v. Morrison
105 Or. 629 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1922
If he did this, the board had no reason to complain: 14 C. J., § 1887; Cook on Corporations, § 652; Jameson v. Coldwell, 23 Or. 144 ( 31 Pac. 279 ); Stanley v. Luse, 36 Or. 25 ( 58 Pac. 75 ); Gam *641 ble v. … A. 527); Barr v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 57 Fed. 86 ( 6 C. C. A. 260 ); Figge v. Bergenthal, 130 Wis. 594 ( 109 N. W. 581 , 110 N. W. 798 ); Stetson v. Northern Inv. Co., 104 Iowa, 393 ( 73 N. W. 869 ); Battelle v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAddicks v. Oregon Board of Parole
92 Or. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 13, 1988
See Addicks v. Board of Parole, 63 Or App 409, 411 , 663 P2d 1310 (1983). On February 27, 1986, the Board met to consider petitioner’s parole, but the hearing was continued for lack of a quorum. … The term “full membership of the Board” means “all voting members of the Board holding office and not disqualified from voting.” Larson v. State Board of Parole, 91 Or App 642 , 756 P2d 674 (1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeter v. State Board of Parole
34 Or. App. 1119 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1978
Erickson v. Board of Parole, 34 Or App 323 , 578 P2d 499 (1978).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWelsh v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
82 Or. App. 315 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986
“[Board chair]: Do you have any questions? “[Board member]: Yes. … Home Plate, Inc. v. OLCC, 20 Or App 188, 190 , 530 P2d 862 (1975). They are.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDavidson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
139 Or. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 1996
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) that imposed a 12-month term of supervised parole, followed by unsupervised parole for the balance of his sentence. … As authority for its imposition of parole for the balance of the sentence, the Board cited administrative rules adopted pursuant to ORS 144.085, which, under the statute in effect, 1 provided that the Board’s rules must require
Cited 3 timesPublishedFriends of Yamhill County v. Board of County Commissioners
278 Or. App. 472 · Yamhill County Circuit Court, Oregon · May 25, 2016
However, as we explained in Kleikamp v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 57, 59-60 , 246 P3d 56 (2010), Measure 37 “was controversial. … See Biggerstaff v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 46, 48 , 245 P3d 688 (2010).
Cited 3 timesPublishedCompensation of the Beneficiaries of Brown v. State Accident Insurance Fund
43 Or. App. 447 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1979
Brown (Brown), appeals from .n order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) ffirming the referee’s order denying compensation on he basis that Brown’s death did not arise "out of and i the course of [his] employment,” … In Gumbrecht v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedQuinn v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
229 Or. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 2009
That rule provides that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may, under specified circumstances, deny an offender parole rather than set a parole release date. … Petitioner argues that the rule violates state and federal constitutional provisions because it allows the board to deny parole to a person convicted of murder, but—due to the operation of other statutes—not to a person convicted
Cited 1 timesPublishedPhillips v. Board of Hospital Trustees
41 Or. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 20, 1979
Good Samaritan Hosp. v. U. S. Nat., 246 Or 478 , 425 P2d 541 (1967); U. S. Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank, 172 Or 683 , 142 P2d 785 , 143 P2d 909 (1943); Restatement (Second) of Trusts, §§ 381, 399 (1959).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAsher v. State Board of Parole
100 Or. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 1990
PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order that revoked his parole. He contends that, at the time of the Board’s action, he was no longer on parole, because his “good time” release date had passed. … Ventris v. Maass, 99 Or App 85 , 781 P2d 1224 (1989), rev den 309 Or 231 (1990). Petitioner also contends that the Board improperly denied his request for appointed counsel for the revocation hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHamilton v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
97 Or. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 1989
PER CURIAM This is a petition for review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) denying petitioner’s request to be discharged or conditionally released and committing him to the Oregon State Hospital. … Baldwin v. PSRB, 97 Or App 367 , 776 P2d 577 (1989). Petitioner was committed to PSRB’s jurisdiction in 1982. Therefore, even if pedophilia is a personality disorder, petitioner is not entitled to release on that basis.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna