Case law

Brown v. A. J. McMahan & Co.

181 Okla. 415 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1937

Co. v. McAvoy, 177 Okla. 60 , 57 P. (2d) 242 . … BATLESS, V. C. J., and PHELPS, CORN, 'and DAVISON, ,TX, concur.

Board of Education of City of Sapulpa v. Corey

63 Okla. 178 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1917

No. 20, Spokane County, v. Bryan, 51 Wash. 498 , 99 Pac. 28 , 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1033; Board of Education v. Dick, 70 Kan. 434 , 78 Pac. 812, 814 ; Jenkins v. Inhabitants of Andover, 103 Mass. 94 ; Merrick v. … Inhabitants of Amherst, 12 Allen (Mass.) 500; Roach v. Board, etc., of St. Louis Public Schools, 77 Mo. 484 ; Collins v. Henderson, 11 Bush (74 Ky.) 74; Irvin v. Gregory, 86 Ga. 605 , 13 S. B. 120; Roach v.

Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Stokes

207 Okla. 37 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1952

In Bass v. Lincoln County, 97 Okla. 94 , 222 P. 995 , cited with approval in Drolte v. … Board of County Com’rs of Oklahoma County v. Beaty, 67 Okla. 281 , 171 P. 34 .

Board of Ed., Town of Gould v. Smith

184 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1938

BAYLESS, V. C. J. The incorporated town of Gould, Harmon county, Okla., is within independent school district No. 6.

Wilkin v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County

77 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1919

In this regard the case resembles very closely the case of Jean Chisholm v. Hoseph C. Shields, Treas. Cuyahoga County, Ohio, 21 O. C. … Kritland v. Hotchkiss, 100 U. S. 491 ; Horne v. Green, 52 Miss. 452 ; Thomas v. Mason *90 County, 67 Ky. 135 ; Dykes v. Lockwood, 43 Pac. 268 .

State Ex Rel. Poulos v. State Board of Equalization

552 P.2d 1138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1976

*1139 ORDER Upon consideration of the “Plan of Compliance” filed by the State Board of Equalization January 7, 1976, and after consideration of oral and written arguments presented in support thereof and in opposition thereto … of Equalization to comply with its constitutional and statutory duties to adjust and equalize the valuation of real and personal property of all the counties of the State of Oklahoma. (3)That the Board shall satisfy its

Wenner v. Board of Education of City of Perry

25 Okla. 515 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1910

Field v. Township of Oswego (C. C.) 28 Fed. 55 . The case of Dempsey v. … Barnes, Mayor, et al. v. Turner & Kirkwood, 14 Okla. 284 , 78 Pac. 108 , 10 L. R. A. (N. S.) 478; Board of County Com’rs of Greer County v. Clark & Courts, 12 Okla. 197 , 70 Pac. 206 .

Smith v. U. S. Board of Parole

269 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 19, 1967

Board of Parole by and through its agents. See Hurley v. Reed, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 32 , 288 F.2d 844 (1961); Young v. Director, U. S. Bureau of Prisons, 367 F.2d 331 (D.C. Cir.-1966); Jones v. … Also see United States v. Figueroa, 325 F.2d 418 (Second Cir.-1963). Cf. Powell v. D. C. Parole Board, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 280 , 349 F.2d 715 (1965).

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board

168 Okla. 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1934

Henson v. Oklahoma State Bank, supra; Latimer et al. v. Haste, Adm’r, et al., 103 Olcla. 109, 223 P. 879 . In Lindeberg v. … See Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 345 Okla. 364 , 292 P. 15 .

Board of Com'rs v. Bristow Battery Co.

28 F.2d 195 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1928

Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. West, 29 Okl. 503 , 118 P. 146 ; Hume v. Wyand, 68 Okl. 261 , 173 P. 813 ; Board of Education of Owasso v. Short, Attorney General, 89 Okl. 5 , 213 P. 857 . … Board of Education of Owasso v. Short, supra; City of Chickasha v. O’Brien, 58 Okl. 46 , 159 P. 282 .

RICHARDS v. FOREMOST INSURANCE CO. v. BROWN & SON MOBILE HOME SVC, LLC

2026 OK 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2026

OSCN Found Document:RICHARDS v. FOREMOST INSURANCE CO. et al. v. BROWN & SON MOBILE HOME SVC, LLC et al. RICHARDS v. FOREMOST INSURANCE CO. et al. v. … Wood v. Mercedes-Benz of Oklahoma City , 2014 OK 68 336 P.3d 457 Harmon v. Cradduck, 2012 OK 80 286 P.3d 643 12 O.S.2021, § 2056 see also H2K Tech., Inc. v. WSP USA, Inc. , 2021 OK 59 503 P.3d 1177 Tiger v.

West v. Board of Comrs. of Caddo County

59 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

In the case of Vansant v. … Also, the Supreme Court of Illinois, in Hughes v. People, 82 Ill. 78 , said: “It follows, therefore, when the county court of St.

Blankenship v. Board of Review, Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

486 P.2d 718 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 6, 1971

In Lanyon v. … In Wilson v.

General Motors Corp. v. Oklahoma County Board of Equalization

678 P.2d 233 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1983

Continental Oil Company v. Oklahoma State Board etc., Okl., 570 P.2d 315 (1977). *236 Although the property belonging to a public trust is exempt from taxation— Art. 10, § 6, Okl. … Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 , 6 S.Ct. 1121 , 30 L.Ed. 178 . In Zane v.

Tulsa Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization

601 P.2d 99 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1979

See Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166 (Okl.1973). 4 . See Application of Puget Sound Pilots’ Ass’n, 63 Wash.2d 142 , 385 P.2d 711, 714 (1973); Baldridge v. … White v. Board of Education, 501 P.2d 358, 361 (Haw.1972). 9 . Commissioner Comments to Model Administrative Procedure Act from which § 311 was patterned. 10 . Winston v.

Dobson Fiber Co. v. State Board of Equalization

72 O.B.A.J. 2197 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 2001

In Pure Oil Pipe Line Co. v. … In Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. v.

Holtzen v. Tulsa County Board of Adjustment

75 O.B.A.J. 2713 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 4, 2004

Cotton v. … Constant v. Brown, 1941 OK 205, ¶ 8 , 114 P.2d 477, 478 ; see also Nucholls v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 1977 OK 3 , ¶ 11, 560 P.2d 556, 560 .

Home Insurance Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

619 P.2d 1276 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 12, 1980

This statute reads: “Whenever any allowance, either in whole or in part, is made upon any claim presented to the Board of County Commissioners and is accepted by the person making the claim, such allowance shall be a full

Hallman v. County Election Board of Oklahoma Cty.

509 P.2d 459 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 13, 1973

However, the shortness of time should not preclude an election board from determining the qualifications of a candidate for a municipal office. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and BERRY, HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

Board of Com'rs. of Harper County v. Day

46 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1915

The precise question is stated in defendant in error’s brief as follows: “Said petition did, not allege that the board of county commissioners were petitioned by the township board to open and establish a public road, and … However, it is manifest that, when the board’s action is invoked in either of these methods, it becomes the duty of the board to determine the fact of "public necessity,” for the act says “the county commissioners shall in