Case law

State v. State Board of Assessors

48 N.J.L. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1886

In the cele *11 brated case of McCulloch v. … So, its propriety was acknowledged and the same rule applied in Pell v. Newark, 11 Vroom 71 . The decision in Rutgers v. New Brunswick, 13 Vroom 51 , rests upon the same legal principle, and in Anderson v.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

52 N.J.L. 398 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1890

This time honored and well recognized method of legislation was affirmed as constitutional in the case of Paul v. … . *403 Foj■ affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Garrison, Magie, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, Whitaker. 11. • For revei'sal—None.

Ivan v. Board of Education

97 N.J. 646 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1984

Schoenfeld v. Board of Review

79 N.J. 492 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 14, 1979

Patuto v. Board of Review

82 N.J. Super. 154 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 24, 1964

Particular reliance is placed on Hancock v. Board of Review, 46 N. J. Super. 418, 421 (App. … Alexander Hamilton Hotel Corp. v. Board of Review, 127 N. J. L. 184 (Sup. Ct. 1941). The court’s duty is to construe a statute and not to write into it conditions or qualifications. That is a legislative function.

Conroy v. Hudson County Board

37 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 1955

Tally v. Board of Education, Hoboken, 10 N. … De Vita v. Housing Authority of City of *235 Paterson, 17 N. J. 350, 355 (1955); Davaillon v. Elizabeth, 121 N. J. L. 380, 386 (Sup. Ct. 1938); Browne v. Hagen, 91 N. J. L. 544 (E. & A. 1918).

Nikolajewski v. Board of Review

56 N.J. 91 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1970

Although petitioner’s mental disability would ordinarily have qualified him for such benefits under the circumstances, his failure to be under the care of a physician during that period was held by the Board of Review and … A. 43:21-30; Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Medina, 39 N. J. 222 (1963). Cf. Renshaw v. U. S. Pipe & Foundry Co., 30 N. J. 558, 566 (1959); McLaughlin v. Board of Review, 7 N. J. Super. 12 (App. Div. 1950).

Thomas v. Board of Review

42 N.J. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 25, 1964

Levy v. Board of Adjustment

43 N.J. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1964

Barnes v. Board of Education

43 N.J. 450 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1964

Schotte v. Board of Commissioners

9 N.J. Misc. 310 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 13, 1931

Ehrhardt v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 560 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1928

An appeal was taken on the same day to the board of adjustment and the appeal was determined by that board on the 27th of October, 1927. … of the board clearly does.

Morales v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 969 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1928

This is an application for a certiorari to review the decision of the board of adjustment of the city of Passaic, dated July 31st, 1928, reversing the decision of the supervisor of buildings, refusing a permit to use premises … The writ is asked for on the ground that the board of adjustment was without jurisdictioon to hear the appeal under the act Pamph.

Board of Pharmacy v. Stockton

6 N.J. Misc. 1109 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 30, 1928

.” *1111 This, with the record of the case under the case of State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel, 102 N. J. L. 74, was ample proof to identify the defendants.

Kienzlan v. Board of Education

102 N.J. Eq. 334 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 6, 1928

Board of Health v. Cohen

88 N.J.L. 369 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 15, 1915

Antonelli v. Board of Commissioners

128 N.J.L. 531 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1942

Tideman v. Board of Commissioners

122 N.J.L. 145 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1939

By resolution, dated June 7th, 1938, the Board of Commissioners created a local assistance board, under the provisions of chapter 123 of the laws of 1938. Members of such board were appointed and, on organization, Mrs. … “She was not discharged by the Board of Commissioners on September 13th, 1938.”

Bourgeois v. Board of Health

77 N.J.L. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1908

Board of Health v. Cattell, 44 Vroom 516 . The principal point argued is that as the act (Pamph. … of Health v.

Prince v. Board of Adjustment

3 N.J. Misc. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1925

This feature of these ordinances has so frequently been passed upon by this court as.not to require citation of authority other than that of Ignaciunas v. Nutley, 2 N. J. Adv. R. 852. … The judgment of the board of adjustment must be set aside, with costs.