Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

0.44s

  • De Rose v. Board of Review

    6 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 1950

    DE ROSE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 9, 1950. Decided January 16, 1950. *165 Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW. Mr. Frank G. … Valenti v. Board of Review, 4 N.J. Super. 162 ( App. Div. 1949). Affirmed with costs.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Maglies v. Planning Board

    84 N.J. 462 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 28, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goldstein v. Lincoln Park Planning Board

    52 N.J. Super. 44 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 16, 1958

    Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, 24 N.J. 94, 103 (1957). … Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment, supra, 24 N.J. at page 103 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pappas v. Board of Adjustment

    254 N.J. Super. 52 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1992

    Hughes v. Washington, 389 U.S. 290, 298 , 88 S.Ct. 438, 443 , 19 L.Ed.2d 530, 536 (1967) (Stewart, J., concurring). In Sheerr v. … In Morris County Land v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Minner v. Board of Trustees

    99 N.J. 199 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mortimer v. Board of Review

    99 N.J. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1984

    Certification to the Board of Review granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    52 N.J.L. 398 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1890

    This time honored and well recognized method of legislation was affirmed as constitutional in the case of Paul v. … . *403 Foj■ affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Garrison, Magie, Van Syokel, Brown, Clement, Cole, Smith, Whitaker. 11. • For revei'sal—None.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ivan v. Board of Education

    97 N.J. 646 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lichtman v. Board of Education

    91 N.J. 538 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 5, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Caffiero

    85 N.J. 133 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 21, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schoenfeld v. Board of Review

    79 N.J. 492 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 14, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Welch v. Board of Education

    159 N.J. Super. 29 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1978

    But school boards are not identical to municipalities, and are not subject to the same constraints. Atlantic Comm. College v. Civil Service Common, 59 N. J. 102, 110 (1971); Gulano v. Elizabeth School Dist. … Mayflower Securities v. Bureau of Securities, 64 N. J. 85, 93 (1973); Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Ed., 139 N. J. Super. 175, 177 (App. Div. 1976), aff’d o. b. 73 N. J. 37 (1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Patuto v. Board of Review

    82 N.J. Super. 154 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 24, 1964

    Particular reliance is placed on Hancock v. Board of Review, 46 N. J. Super. 418, 421 (App. … Alexander Hamilton Hotel Corp. v. Board of Review, 127 N. J. L. 184 (Sup. Ct. 1941). The court’s duty is to construe a statute and not to write into it conditions or qualifications. That is a legislative function.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Conroy v. Hudson County Board

    37 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 1955

    Tally v. Board of Education, Hoboken, 10 N. … De Vita v. Housing Authority of City of *235 Paterson, 17 N. J. 350, 355 (1955); Davaillon v. Elizabeth, 121 N. J. L. 380, 386 (Sup. Ct. 1938); Browne v. Hagen, 91 N. J. L. 544 (E. & A. 1918).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nikolajewski v. Board of Review

    56 N.J. 91 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1970

    Although petitioner’s mental disability would ordinarily have qualified him for such benefits under the circumstances, his failure to be under the care of a physician during that period was held by the Board of Review and … A. 43:21-30; Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Medina, 39 N. J. 222 (1963). Cf. Renshaw v. U. S. Pipe & Foundry Co., 30 N. J. 558, 566 (1959); McLaughlin v. Board of Review, 7 N. J. Super. 12 (App. Div. 1950).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Board of Review

    42 N.J. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 25, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Levy v. Board of Adjustment

    43 N.J. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barnes v. Board of Education

    43 N.J. 450 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schotte v. Board of Commissioners

    9 N.J. Misc. 310 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 13, 1931

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ehrhardt v. Board of Adjustment

    6 N.J. Misc. 560 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1928

    An appeal was taken on the same day to the board of adjustment and the appeal was determined by that board on the 27th of October, 1927. … of the board clearly does.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.