Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.06s

  • McCausland v. R. A. Brown Construction Co.

    172 N.C. 708 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1916

    Morton v. Water Co., 168 N. C., 582 ; Withers v. Poe, 167 N. C., 372 ; Supply Co. v. Lumber Co., 160 N. C., 428 ; Voorhees v. Porter, 134 N. C., 591 ; Town of Gastonia v. Engineering Co., 131 N. C., 363 ; Gorrell v. … S., 573, with note by the editor; Ocho v. Carnahan Co., 42 Ind. App., 157 ; Brown v. Maryland, 22 Ind. App., 652 ; Jordan v. Kavanaugh, 63 Iowa, 152 , and eases cited in note to Cleveland Roofing Co. v. Gaspard, Anno.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Halifax Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Brown

    228 N.C. App. 43 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 2013

    See Mullen v. … Brown, that’s to be resolved by arbitration.” Thus, defendant’s argument fails.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • James v. Board of Education

    282 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1972

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education v. Rocky Mount Board of Adjustment

    169 N.C. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2005

    See also Heaton v. … See Brown v. Flowe, 349 N.C. 520, 523-24 , 507 S.E.2d 894, 896 (1998) (“When multiple statutes address a single subject, this Court construes them in pari materia to determine and effectuate the legislative intent.”).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Somers v. Board of Commissioners

    123 N.C. 582 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1898

    Code, Section 3687; Laws 1897, Chapter 169, Section 117; Perry v. Campbell, 63 N. C., 257 ; McNeill v. Somers, 96 N. C., 467 . … Greer v. Asheville, supra. No error..

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. . Board of Elections

    172 N.C. 162 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1916

    BROWN, J., dissenting. … McCullers v. Comrs. , 158 N.C. 75 ; Edgerton v. Kirby , 156 N.C. 347 ; Kitchin v. Wood , 154 N.C. 565 ; Board of Education v. Board of Comrs. , 150 N.C. at page 121, citing Moses on Mandamus, p. 68.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. North Carolina Department of Correction

    697 S.E.2d 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2010

    BROWN, Petitioner v. … Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and HUDSON dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Jones v. Keller, ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (2010).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Craig v. Board of Education

    362 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of MacOn County v. Board of Commissioners of Jackson County

    75 N.C. 240 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1876

    Pool v. Allen, 7 Iredell, 120; Adams v. Reeves, 68 N. C. Rep., 134 . … Commissioners of Catawba v. Litzer, 70 N. C. Rep., 426 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. . Greenville

    132 N.C. 3 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1903

    Wharton v. Comrs. , 82 N.C. 11 . … Cited: School Directors v. Asheville , 137 N.C. 507 ; Dockery v. Hamlet , 162 N.C. 120 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Health v. . Commissioners

    173 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1917

    Pritchard v. Comrs. , 126 N.C. pp. 908-913 ; Hopper v. Covington , 118 U.S. pp. 148-151 ; Equitable Assurance v. Brown , 213 U.S. 25 ; Graef v. Equitable Insurance , 160 N.Y. 119 ; Griffin v. R. … Ormond v. Ins. Co. , 145 N.C. 142 . The presence of the Board of Health, therefore, even without the power to sue, does not prevent the efficient maintenance of the action.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bynum v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

    678 S.E.2d 232 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2009

    678 S.E.2d 232 (2009) Waddell BYNUM v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and City of Charlotte Sanitation. No. 156P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 17, 2009. Robert D.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Dorsett

    151 N.C. 307 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1909

    Smith v. Carr, 128 N. C., 150 ; Adams Eq., 269-270; Beach on Mod. Eq. Jurisprudence, sec. 822 et seq.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barrett v. Board of Education

    13 F. Supp. 3d 502 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 9, 2014

    Co. v. United States, 945 F.2d 765, 768 (4th Cir.1991). … Lytle v. Doyle, 326 F.3d 463, 471 (4th Cir.2003) (quoting Carter v. Morris, 164 F.3d 215, 218 (4th Cir.1999)).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co.

    325 F. Supp. 541 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 31, 1970

    ) shown for the differences; and there were other white welders who made less progress than Brown. … Brown’s progress in fact was at least as good as average among the welders in the plant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Craig v. Board of Education

    667 S.E.2d 724 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 1, 2008

    667 S.E.2d 724 (2008) CRAIG v. BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 484PA07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 1, 2008. Bruce Robinson, Wilmington, Burton Craige, Raleigh, for Craig. David A. … Nash, Wilmington, for Board of Education. Barbara B. Weyher, T. Carlton Younger, III, Raleigh, Allison Schafer, Legal Counsel, for NC School Boards Asso.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hassell v. Board of Education

    647 S.E.2d 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 8, 2007

    647 S.E.2d 430 (2007) HASSELL v. BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 172A07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 8, 2007. Ralph T. Bryant, Jr., Havelock, for Hassell. … Gary Scarzafava, Assistant Attorney General, for Board of Education. George W. Lennon, Raleigh, for NCATL.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Howard v. . Board of Education

    196 N.C. 229 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 1928

    But this is left, under the law, to the sound discretion of the board of education. The record discloses that the plaintiffs are good, law-abiding citizens, interested in education. … Under the facts disclosed by the record, we cannot interfere in the board of education’s discretion. The judgment below is Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • First National Bank of Lumberton v. Brown

    160 N.C. 23 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1912

    Revisal, sec. 2205; Bank v. Fountain, 148 N. C., 590 ; Bank v. Burgwyn, 108 N. C., 62 ; Manufacturing Co. v. Summers, 143 N. C., 102 . … Their representations were of a very glowing promissory character (Williamson v. Holt, 147 N. C., 515 ), such as promoters frequently indulge in when “boosting” their enterprises. Cash Register v. Townsend, 137 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hinson v. Board of Commissioners

    216 N.C. 806 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1940

    Co. v. Stinson, 214 N. C., 97 . The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.