Case law

Fitzpatrick v. McKnight

District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jul 3, 2025

which could be characterized as fraudulent, malicious, or oppressive,” (ECF No. 15 at 7), but evidently forgot that he is not entitled to qualified immunity if his act was “in violation of clearly established statutory … If the plaintiff demonstrates the violation of a clearly established right or law, the employee is not immune from liability. Jd. at 767.

James E. McCurdy v. Montgomery County, Ohio

240 F.3d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 16, 2001

Qualified immunity *520 shields government officials performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages when their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … We apply a two-step analysis to determine whether a public official is entitled to qualified immunity: first, we determine whether a clearly established constitutional or statutory right has been violated; and second, we

Virgie Lee Otey v. Melvin Marshall

121 F.3d 1150 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 30, 1997

A qualified immunity defense "shields government agents from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … the federal right allegedly infringed was clearly established . . . .

Paterek v. Village of Armada, Michigan

801 F.3d 630 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 8, 2015

Qualified Immunity Delecke asserts immunity as a public official even if Plaintiffs’ rights were violated. … Delecke’s claim for qualified immunity.

Weyant v. Okst

101 F.3d 845 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 3, 1996

clearly established constitutional rights, or (2) it was objectively reasonable for them to believe their acts did not violate those rights. … Qualified immunity does not protect those who are " 'plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law.' " Hunter v. Bryant, 502 U.S. at 229 , 112 S.Ct. at 537 (quoting Malley v.

Ricardo Glover v. Kevin A. Carr

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 6, 2020

Holzmacher would surely be entitled to qualified immunity. In order for Dr. … Holzmacher is not presently a party to the litigation, we decline to resolve the matter of qualified immunity. Qualified immunity is a personal defense, Walker v.

Bruns v. Halford

913 F. Supp. 1295 · District Court, N.D. Iowa · Jan 23, 1996

Bruns violated no clearly *1298 established constitutional rights, and therefore defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. Mr. … Bruns has stated a due process claim under governing law, are defendants entitled to qualified immunity from that claim, because their conduct did not violate clearly established constitutional principles?

Martin v. Department of Children and Family Services

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 13, 2020

immunity and that Plaintiffs have failed to overcome qualified immunity by establishing a violation of a clearly established constitutional right.36 Defendants claim that heightened pleading is needed in qualified immunity … immunity.”120 To overcome the claim of qualified immunity, Plaintiffs must demonstrate that Defendants violated a statutory or constitutional right and that the right was clearly established at the time of

STOKES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2022

Rickard, 572 U.S. 765, 778 (2014) (“An official sued under § 1983 is entitled to qualified immunity unless it is shown that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right that was ‘clearly established’ … Therefore, the qualified immunity analysis involves determining whether the defendant violated a right that was “clearly established” at the time of the challenged conduct. Plumhoff, 572 U.S. at 778.

Farrow v. Weatherford City of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 26, 2025

The Individual Defendants argue, in part, that Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim is barred by qualified immunity because Plaintiff cannot show he had a “clearly established” constitutional right that they violated.5 They … plaintiffs “failed to identify clearly-established law” as required under the second qualified immunity prong). IV.

K.O. v. Sessions, III

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 23, 2020

On the “clearly established” prong, “[t]he dispositive question is ‘whether the violative nature of particular conduct is clearly established.’’’ Abassi, 137 S. Ct. at 1866 (quoting Mullenix v. … conduct is clearly established.

Steven Melton v. City of Forrest City, Arkansas

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 13, 2025

immunity fails.”); Burnham, 119 F.3d at 680 (holding that the employer’s “failure to establish workplace disruption . . . is fatal to his claim of qualified immunity under a Pickering analysis”). … Sexton, 210 F.3d at 914 (holding that the constitutional violation was clearly established despite having to conduct the Pickering balancing).

Ken Mouille, Leroy Liberda v. The City of Live Oak, Texas, Mark E. Jackley, Douglas Faesler, and Timothy Britt

977 F.2d 924 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 15, 1993

Liberda appeals certain jury instructions and Britt reasserts the affirmative defense of qualified immunity. We find that Britt is enti-tied to qualified immunity. … Qualified Immunity — Britt Britt answers Liberda’s Section 1983 claims with the affirmative defense of qualified immunity. Qualified immunity determinations implicate a multi-faceted framework.

(PS) Ward v. Upshaw

District Court, E.D. California · Apr 4, 2025

However, this court need not decide that 3 question because it is apparent that the officer defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. 4 There was, at the time of plaintiff’s detention, no “clearly established” First … Luna, 577 U.S. 7, 13 7 (2015) (a right is not clearly established for qualified immunity purposes unless existing 8 precedent “squarely governs” the specific facts at issue).

Cayenne v. Tobyhanna Township, PA

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2024

to qualified immunity. … the right was clearly established.

Williams v. Hansen

326 F.3d 569 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 22, 2003

clearly established in February 1996. … Because the plaintiffs have made out valid claims for the denial of a clearly established constitutional right, the district court correctly denied Hansen's motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity.

Jones v. Collin College

District Court, E.D. Texas · Aug 25, 2022

The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from suit “unless their conduct violates a clearly established constitutional right.” DePree v. … ” of qualified immunity); Zuniga v.

Begin v. Drouin

908 F.3d 829 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Nov 16, 2018

An exception applies when such an order rejects a qualified immunity defense tendered in response to a claim of official malfeasance in violation of section 1983. … What the law does or does not clearly establish for purposes of assessing a qualified immunity defense is itself a question of law. See Morse v.

Thompson v. Reuting

968 F.2d 756 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 7, 1992

Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 , 106 S.Ct. 1092 , 89 L.Ed.2d 271 (1986), the Supreme Court held that police officers seeking arrest warrants are entitled to qualified immunity for their actions unless “the warrant application is so … We therefore affirm the District Court’s dismissal of Thompson’s complaint on the ground that Reuting was entitled to qualified immunity for his actions. III.

Hanrahan v. Doling

331 F.3d 93 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 30, 2003

and Magistrate Judge below. 10 In evaluating whether a right is clearly established for purposes of the second prong of the qualified immunity inquiry, the court looks to both "the clarity of the law establishing the right … It would defy logic to analyze qualified immunity, as defendants urge, in terms of unpredictable subsequent events, and courts have repeatedly declined to frame the clearly established inquiry through the "20/20 vision of