Case law

Citicorp Savings & Trust Co. v. Banking Board of Oklahoma

704 P.2d 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1985

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … Wade v. Brown, 516 P.2d 526 (Okl.1973). 8 . United States v. Borden Co., 308 U.S. 188, 198 , 60 S.Ct. 182, 188 , 84 L.Ed. 181 (1939); also see U.S. v.

Board of Ed. of City Drumright v. Bd. Cty.

171 Okla. 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1935

On December 20, 3924, plaintiff, the board of education of the city of Drumright, a municipal corporation, obtained a judgment in the district court of Creek county against the defendant, board of county commissioners of … A rule applicable here was stated and followed in Pitzer v.

Trudgeon v. Board of Com'rs of McClain County

180 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1937

Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Washington County, 171 Okla. 302 , 42 P. (2d) 533 , and Chickasaw Lumber Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Stephens County, 173 Okla. 197 , 47 P. (2d) 137 . … Co. v. Board of County Com’rs of Carter County, 160 Okla. 232 , 11 P. (2d) 117 , and Board of County Com’rs of Payne County v. Standard Accident Insurance Co., 172 Okla. 355 , 45 P. (2d) 459 .

Board of Com'rs v. School District No. 25

141 Okla. 65 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1930

Board of Co. Com’rs, Carter Co., v. School District No. 71, 135 Okla. 248 , 275 Pac. 302 ; Board of Co. Com’rs v. School District No. 36, 135 Okla. 249 , 275 Pac. 303 ; Board of Co. Com’rs v. … No. 1, 137 Okla. 193 , 279 Pac. 326 ; Board of Education of Sapulpa v. Board of Co. Com’rs, Creek Co., 127 Okla. 132 , 260 Pac. 22 ; School District No. 7, Creek Co., v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 135 Okla. 1 , 275 Pac. 292 .

State Capital Printing Co. v. Board of Commissioners

8 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

(Rogers v. Bonnett, 2 Okla. 553 , 37 Pac. 1078 ; Wetz v. Elliott, 4 Okla. 618 , 51 Pac. 657 ; Central Loan & Trust Co. v. Campbell Commission Co., 5 Okla. 396 , 49 Pac. 48 ; Ferris v. Higley, 20 Wall. 375 ; Clayton v. … The other errors assigned and discussed were fully considered, discussed, and determined by this court in Hockaday v. Jones, this volume, p. 156. The judgment is reversed, and the cause dismissed.

Threadgill v. Board of Ed. of City of Coalgate

85 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1922

In O’Neal Engineering Co. v. … PITOHFORD, V. C. X, and KANE, JOHNSON, and. KENNAMER, JX, concur.

Stern v. University of Oklahoma Board of Regents

841 P.2d 1168 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1992

Brown v. Trustees of Boston University, 891 F.2d 337 (1st Cir.1989). … See King v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior College, 541 P.2d 836 (Okla.1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). . See Perry v.

Material Service Corp. v. Rogers County Board of Commissioners

273 P.3d 880 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 18, 2011

. ¶ 1 Defendant/Appellant/Counter-Appellee Rogers County Board of Commissioners (County) appeals from a jury verdict which found County liable for a temporary taking and awarded damages. … Cartwright v.

Excise Board v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

152 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 6, 1931

But in view of what .is 'held in Protest of Carter Oil Co., supra, and Boardman Co. v. Board of Co. … In Boardman Co. v. Board of Com’rs, supra, it was held: “Section 10102, C. O.

In Re Bank of Bixby v. Banking Board

524 P.2d 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1974

Subsequent to entry of the Court of Bank Review order this court adopted an opinion in Brown et al. v. … Banking Board, supra, the reviewing court will then be authorized to give the full review contemplated by Brown v. Banking Board, supra.

Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. Comstock

161 Okla. 43 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1932

Following the general rule and the provisions of the Constitution, probably, the case of Moore v. … V. C. J., and RILEY, KEENER, SWINDALL. and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. McNEILL, J., concurs in conclusion. CUL-LISON, J., dissents. LESTICIl, C. J., absent.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF CHOCTAW CO. v. Schuessler

358 P.2d 830 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1960

Commissioners of Land Office v. … No. 1 of King County et al. v.

Consolidated School Dist. No. 72 v. Board of Ed.

113 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1925

School District No. 44 v. Turner, 13 Okla. 71 , 73 Pac. 952 , is conclusive upon this phase of the case. … In the case of Pettis v.

School Board of District No. 4 v. Yalch

182 Okla. 605 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1938

In Dailey v. Citizens Nat. … BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, PHELPS, GIBSON, and I-IIJRST, J.T., concur.

Harris v. United States Board of Parole

429 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1977

Parole Board, Chicago Div., Illinois, 356 F.Supp. 943 (N.D.Ill.1973). In Gregory v. … United States Board of Paroles, supra, against challenges that it permits the parole board to deprive a prisoner of earned good time, O’Neal v.

Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Mullins

202 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1950

In this connection plaintiff cites City of McAlester et al. v. State ex rel. Board of Public Affairs, 195 Okla. 1 , 154 P. 2d 579 , together with the cases therein cited, namely: Zachary v. … The distinction is stated in Hume v. Wyand et al., 68 Okla. 261 , 173 P. 813 , and in Liberty National Bank v. County Excise Board of Jefferson County, 175 Okla. 245 , 52 P. 2d 51 . In Hume v.

Freedom Ranch, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

878 P.2d 380 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1994

See, City of Cleburne v. … Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 , 47 S.Ct. 114 , 71 L.Ed. 303 (1926). 4 . Jacobs, Visconi & Jacobs v.

Strange v. Board of Com'rs of Choctaw County

158 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1932

We think, under the provisions of this statute, where the board of county commissioners rejects the sale as advertised, a new sale must be made and a new notice by publication must be given and the sale approved by the board … In Airy v. Thompson, 154 Okla. 1 , 6 P. (2d) 445 , this court said: “Section 9745, O. O.

Sams v. Board of Com'rs of Creek County

72 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1919

The answer filed ¡by the defendant in the lower court consisted of a general denial, but upon call of the case for trial, and after plaintiff's attorney had made her opening statement to the jury, the attorney for the board … of county commissioners, as well as by the county excise board.

Dobbs v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County

208 Okla. 514 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1953

An amended petition was filed showing that the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county did, on March 24, 1953, appoint William A. … Oklahoma County Excise Board, 186 Okla. 706 , 100 P. 2d 448 ; Crawford v. Smith, 162 Okla. 165 , 19 P. 2d 964 ; Roberts v.