Case law

Pace University v. National Labor Relations Board

514 F.3d 19 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 2008

Co. v. NLRB, 386 F.3d 1160, 1163-64 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 1146, 1151-52 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting Thomas-Davis Med. Ctrs. v. NLRB, 157 F.3d 909, 912 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); see Wackenhut Corp. v. NLRB, 178 F.3d 543, 552-53 (D.C.

Seattle Opera v. National Labor Relations Board

292 F.3d 757 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2002

(f); see Alois Box Co. v. … Huizinga Cartage Co. v.

Smith v. Billing

22 F. Cas. 456 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1828

,” (not naming them,) against the executors of Margaret Brown, who was the administratrix of Robert Brown, and her “ securities,” to set aside a credit claimed by her in her administration account, and to compel a distribution … The administrator de bonis non of Robert JBrown was the only party who could call on the executors of Margaret Brown for the assets of the estate of-Robert Brown, which came to the hands of Margaret Brown.

Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board

796 F.3d 111 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 11, 2015

In FEC v. … United States v. Fla. E. Coast Ry.

Khaksari v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors

451 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2011

The same argument was raised in Nyunt v. … See Davis v.

National Broadcasting Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

380 A.2d 998 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1977

See Doherty v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 206 (1971). There is no assertion that when NABET struck NBC on April 1, 1976, it was not engaged in a labor dispute. … See, e. g., Adams v. Industrial Commission, 490 S.W.2d 77 (Mo.1973); Baltimore Typographical Union No. 12 v.

Hill v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

766 A.2d 497 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 2000

See Alston v. United States, 590 A.2d 511, 514 (D.C.1991). … another offense), and the District of Columbia Board of Parole had no duty to hold a parole revocation hearing, see also Moody v.

Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

655 F. Supp. 1561 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 1987

Id.; see also National Cable Television v. FCC, 747 F.2d 1503 (D.C. *1567 Cir.1984). … National Cable Television , at 1507; Air Transport Ass’n. of America v. CAB, 732 F.2d 219, 224 (D.C.Cir.1984).

Rail-Term Corp. v. Railroad Retirement Board

666 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2016

Draude v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

527 A.2d 1242 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1987

Palmer v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 287 A.2d 535, 540 (D.C.1972). … See Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372 (D.C.1977).

Duchek v. National Transportation Safety Board

364 F.3d 311 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 2004

Administrator v. Duchek, NTSB Order No. EA-5040 (May 23, 2003), at 4–5 (Board Order). … Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504, 512 (1994) (citing, inter alia, Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 (1965)).

Shay v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

334 A.2d 175 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1975

See also Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 538 (1972); Robey v. Schwab, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 307 F.2d 198 (1962); 2 K. Davis, Administrative Law § 16.05 at 444 (1958). … See, e. g., Goldstein v. Zoning Board of Review, City of Warwick, 101 R.I. 728 , 227 A.2d 195 (R.I.1967).

Santos v. Merit Systems Protection Board

21 F. App'x 5 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 2001

United Steelworkers v. National Labor Relations Board

401 F.2d 434 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 3, 1968

The Board was plainly justified in finding no unfair labor practice; this was a small matter resulting from “circumstances which the Board could or should accept as excusing or justifying unilateral action.” NLRB v. … E. g., NLRB v. Southland Cork Co., supra. The Company, on the other hand, urges that the Board should have tolled the back-pay provisions until the date of its order.

Ceridian Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

435 F.3d 352 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 2006

Cassell v. FCC, 154 F.3d 478, 483 (D.C. Cir. 1998); see Boca Airport, Inc. v. FAA, 389 F.3d 185, 190 (D.C. Cir. 2004); U.S. Telecom Ass’n v. FCC, 295 F.3d 1326, 1332 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Global Crossing Telecomms., Inc. v. … ITT Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 995, 999 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (quoting Lechmere, Inc. v. NLRB, 502 U.S. 527, 536 (1992) (citing Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 (1984))).

Turner v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2014

Niedermeier v. Office of Max S. Baucus, 153 F. Supp. 2d 23, 28 (D.D.C. 2001) (citing Anyanwutaku v. Moore, 151 F.3d 1053, 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1998)); see also Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 671 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Solomon v. Univ. of S. Cal., 255 F.R.D. 303, 304 (D.D.C. 2009).

National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

392 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 1968

Delta Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 228 F.2d 17 (1955); cf. Pan American-Grace Airways v. … Delta Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 50, 228 F.2d 17 , 21 (1955). . Delta Air Lines v.

Silverstone v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

372 A.2d 1286 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1977

Brown v. Gerhardt, 5 Ill.2d 106 , 125 N.E.2d 53 (1955), cited by petitioners in support of their contention is inapposite. … Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 542 (1972).

Davis v. District of Columbia Board of Education

522 F. Supp. 1102 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 1981

Brown, 498 F.Supp. 823 (D.D.C. 1980). 5 . See 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (1976); 34 C.F.R. § 300.508 . 6 . See Mrs. A.J. v. Special School District No. 1, 478 F.Supp. 418, 431 (D.Minn.1979); Lora v. … This court stated in Cox v.

Alton Railroad v. Railroad Retirement Board

1 D.C. 263 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1933

This Board and its individual members are the defendants in the case. The Act is entitled “An Act to provide a retirement system for railroad employees, to provide unemployment relief, and for other purposes.” … The Retirement Board is given authority, if as and when necessary to increase the percentage fixed in the Act, without, however, altering the ratio between employee and carrier contributions.