Case law

Haynes v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

229 Or. App. 178 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 17, 2009

PER CURIAM Pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges OAR 255-032-0010(3), a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.

Wetmore v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 12, 2021

KATE BROWN, Defendant. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)).

Maney v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 15, 2020

Farmer v. … See Starr v.

Parkerson v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 12, 2021

Brown et al. (the “Maney case”) (ECF No. 7). … See Albino v.

Maney v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 2, 2021

Kate Brown is the Governor of the State of Oregon (hereinafter, “Governor Brown”). (Id. ¶ 11.) Colette Peters is the Director of ODOC (id. ¶ 12), and Heidi Steward is the Deputy Director of ODOC. (Id. ¶ 13.) … See McGuckin v.

Cochran v. Board of Psychologist Examiners

171 Or. App. 324 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2000

The Board’s opinion, however, does not identity the standard it employed in reaching that conclusion, nor does it set out the evidence in the record that supports its conclusion. See Cochran v. … An agency, however, may not “ ‘use its special knowledge as a substitute for evidence presented at a hearing.’ ” Drew v. PSRB, 322 Or 491, 498 , 909 P2d 1211 (1996) (quoting and adopting a statement from Rolfe v.

Brown v. Ives

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 20, 2020

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RONALD MARTEZ BROWN, No. 3:18-cv-01260-SB … United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith

295 Or. 755 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1983

The Disciplinary Review Board also rejected the Trial Board’s conclusion that there was no pending procedure. … See Crow v. Abraham, 86 Or 99 , 167 P 590 (1917) and Haney v. Neace-Stark Co., 109 Or 93 , 216 P 757 , 219 P 190 (1923) defining judgments “on the merits.”

Oregon School Activities Ass'n v. State Board of Education

244 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 2011

First Commerce of America v. Nimbus Center Assoc., 329 Or 199, 206 , 986 P2d 556 (1999), rev’d on other grounds by Kerr v. Bradbury, 340 Or 241 , 131 P3d 737 (2006). … Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402, 405 , 848 P2d 1194 (1993); Kay v. David Douglas Sch. Dist.

Flores v. Board of Parole

344 Or. App. 287 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 15, 2025

Bell v. Board of Parole, 283 Or App 711, 713, 391 P3d 907, rev den, 361 Or 645 (2017). … Penn v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 607, 635, 451 P3d 589 (2019); see also Schmult v.

Maney v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 1, 2020

The next day, Governor Brown issued Executive Order No. 20-05, prohibiting large gatherings of 250 people or more. (Id.) Governor Brown’s guidelines followed updated guidance from the U.S. … Swain, 958 F.3d at 1089; see also Sanchez, et al. v. Dallas Cty. Sheriff Marian Brown, No. 3:20-cv-00832-E, 2020 WL 2615931, at *16 (N.D. Tex.

Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.

264 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1973

Nowicki v. Planning and Zoning Board, 148 Conn 492, 172 A2d 386, 389 (1961). … Bigenho v. Montgomery County Council, 248 Md 386, 237 A2d 53 (1968); Bayer v. Siskind, 247 Md 116, 230 A2d 316 (1967); Board of County Com’rs of Howard County v. Tipton, 244 Md 77, 222 A2d 701 (1966); Bujno v.

City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement Board

281 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1978

E.g., State ex rel Heinig v. City of Milwaukie, 231 Or 473 , 373 P2d 680 (1962). E.g., Brown v. City of Salem, 251 Or 150 , 444 P2d 936 (1968); Bennet v. … Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 53 US (12 How) 299, 13 L Ed 996 (1851).

Pahl v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

164 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 15, 1999

See generally SAIF v. Wright, 312 Or 132, 137 , 817 P2d 1317 (1991) (statutes can confer authority to an agency either expressly or by necessary implication). … For that proposition, he relies on State ex rel Black v. Amer. Recovery, 12 Or App 139 , 505 P2d 1166 (1973).

Berovic v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

117 Or. App. 359 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1992

Noren v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 117 Or App 337 , 843 P2d 1021 (1992).

Woodroffe v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

219 Or. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 2008

See State ex rel Huddleston v. … In Alexander v.

McCarter v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 20, 2020

On March 8, Oregon Governor Kate Brown declared a state of emergency, currently in effect until September 4. … City of Cuyahoga Falls Ohio v. Buckeye Cmty. Hope Found., 538 U.S. 188, 196 (2003); see also Meyer v.

Demeyer v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

208 Or. App. 267 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 27, 2006

Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our opinion in Demeyer v. Board of Parole, 206 Or App 740 , 139 P3d 969 (2006). We allow reconsideration and adhere to our former opinion. … Petitioner asserted that he was prejudiced by the board’s consideration of the report because, without it in the record, the board could not defer his parole release date.

Brown v. Premo

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 31, 2020

BROWN, . … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Blacknall v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

223 Or. App. 294 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 2008

We dismissed the petition as moot, designating the board as the prevailing party and awarding costs. Blacknall v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 200 , 189 P3d 1234 (2008). … In support of that inference, petitioner relies on dictum in Atkinson v. Board of Parole, 341 Or 382 , 143 P3d 538 (2006), which notes the existence of such a possible inference.