Case law

Jack Lincoln Shops, Inc. v. State Dry Cleaners' Board

192 Okla. 251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1943

Cleaners & Dyers v. … Herrin v. Arnold, above; Croxton v. State, 186 Okla. 249 , 97 P. 2d 11 .

Board of County Com'rs of Lincoln County v. Robertson

35 Okla. 616 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1913

And that such order is appealable although no final judgment is rendered thereon, see Burdick, New Trials and Appeals, sec. 163; United States Express Co. v. State, 33 Okla. 370 , 125 Pac. 448 ; Bartholomew v. … The board acted within its jurisdiction in making the allowances, and there is no claim that they acted fraudulently. That the items were proper expenditures cannot be doubted. See Butler v.

Board of County Commissioners of Greer Co. v. Henry

33 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

See, also, Welsh v. R. H. Bramlet, 98 Cal. 219 , 33 Pac. 66 ; Kehn v. State of N. Y., 93 N. Y. 291 ; Jacobs v. United States, 41 Ct. Cl. 452 ; Board of County Com’rs v. … Burns, 3 Wyo. 691 , 29 Pac. 894 , 30 Pac. 415 ; Guthrie v. Board of County Com’rs, 7 Wyo. 95 , 50 Pac. 229 .

Carl v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma

577 P.2d 912 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1978

See Arkansas Gazette Company v. Pickens, 258 Ark. 69 , 522 S.W.2d 350 (1975). In Sanders v. … Gradison, Fla., 296 So.2d 473 (1974); Mclarty v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, 231 Ga. 22 , 200 S.E.2d 117 (1973); and Washington School District No. 6 v.

Board Com'rs Harper v. Boards of Com'rs of Woodward

27 Okla. 748 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1911

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board

141 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1930

Blackwood, 76 Okla. 175 , 184 Pac. 582 , and Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Sappington, 124 Okla. 16 , 253 Pac. 483 . … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Poulos v. State Board of Equalization

46 O.B.A.J. 780 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1975

Austin v. State Board of Education, 407 P.2d 218 (Okl.1972). Although a precise uniformity is not required, [see The Board of County Commissioners of Canadian County v. … State v. Dept. of Public Welfare, 206 Okl. 583 , 245 P.2d 452 (1952).

Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.

182 Okla. 527 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 26, 1938

Defendant relies upon Austin Western Road Machinery Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Carter County, 160 Okla. 232 , 11 P.2d 117 , and Board of County Commissioners of Payne County v. Standard Accident Ins. … and a resulting payment of one contract by warrants and the other by judgment.’ ” See in this connection the recent case of Board of County Commissioners v.

Board of Com'rs of Garfield Cty. v. Phillips Univ.

144 Okla. 57 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1930

In the case of Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. … LESTER, V. O. J., and CLARK, CULLI-SON, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J., and HUNT and RILEY, JJ., absent. SWINDALL, J., not participating.

McIntosh v. Board of Com'rs of McIntosh County

179 Okla. 610 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1937

Defendants cite Sartin v. Hughen (1932) 154 Okla. 155 , 7 P. (2d) 151 . Oases to this effect are legion, and this rule is not disputed by plaintiff. … Marland Refining Co. v. Snider (1927) 125 Okla. 260 , 257 P. 797 . The right to the money was clearly an issue in the former case, 'and that judgment is conclusive and is a bar to the present action.

Swatek v. Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges

535 P.2d 295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1975

In Graham v. … In Morse v.

Central Liquor Co. v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

640 P.2d 1351 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1982

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Central Liquor Co., 421 P.2d 244, 248 (Okl.1966). 6 . … Austin Nichols & Co. v. Okl. Cty. Bd. of Tax-Roll Corrections, 578 P.2d 1200, 1203 (Okl.1978). 8 . Oklahoma Natural Gas v. Choctaw Gas Co., 205 Okl. 255, 261 , 236 P.2d 970, 977 (1951). 9 . See note 4, supra.

State Ex Rel. v. Excise Board of Payne County

155 Okla. 227 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1932

This being true, the excise 'board was without authority to reduce either the estimate or the levy. In the case of In re Tax Levies of City of Woodward v. … J., CLARK, V. O. J., and RILEY, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JX, concur.

State Ex Rel. Smith v. State Election Board

169 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1934

Atty., v. Kenner, 21 Okla. 817 , 97 P. 258 ), it appears that there is no occasion for the exercise of such jurisdiction. The same is denied. By response of Lester E. … Dancy v. Peebly, 132 Okla. 84 , 270 P. 311 . Chapter 62, S.

Independent School District 1 v. Board of County Commissioners

674 P.2d 547 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1983

In State v. … Board of County Commissioners v. Montoya, 91 N.M. 421 , 575 P.2d 605 (1978). 4 . Okla. Const.

Board of Education of Dependent School District No. 32 of Seminole County v. Oklahoma State Board of Education

521 P.2d 390 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1974

Board of Education and that adjustments to the budget of the transferee district made by the excise board forthwith shall be certified to the State Board. … In the 1967 decision of this Court in Board of Education of I.S.D. No. 1 of Tulsa County v.

Meadows v. Pittsburg County Board of County Commissioners

66 O.B.A.J. 2112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1995

Rodgers v. Higgins, 871 P.2d 398 (Okla.1993); Jaco Production Company v. Luca, 823 P.2d 364 (Okla.1991). … Browning-Ferris, Inc., 833 P.2d 1218 , 1230 n. 66 (Okla.1992), we noted that 51 O.S.1981 § 153(B) states that the liability of the political subdivision under the Act is exclusive and in place of all other liability at common

Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. Board of Com'rs

186 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1939

Richards, 111 Okla. 185 , 239 P. 262 ; State v. McCurdy, 115 Okla. 111 , 241 P. 816 ; Sanders v. Board of County Commissioners, 160 Okla. 52 , 15 P. 2d 818 . … National Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Richards, supra; Sanders v. Board of County Commissioners, supra. We shall determine the proper amount of the judgment herein.

Thomason, Co. Treas. v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware

56 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916

The defendant in error, board of county commissioners of Delaware county, plaintiff below, filed its motion for writ of mandamus in the district court of Delaware county against plaintiff in error, J. D. … Co. v. State, 43 Okla. 368 , 143 Pac. 37 . By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cooper v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County

188 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1940

He also cites Kirsch v. Tracy, 174 Okla. 489 , 55 P. 2d 428 , and Thompson v. Yates, 184 Okla. 86 , 85 P. 2d 415 . … It may be noted that in Jepeway v. Barrett, 165 Okla. 220 , 25 P. 2d 661 , it is held: “The statement in Mannus-Dewall v. Smith, 139 Okla. 195 , 281 P. 807 , and Massey v.