Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.87s

  • PPL Montana, LLC v. Surface Transportation Board

    437 F.3d 1240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 2006

    Before: GINSBURG , Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN , Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN . … BROWN , Circuit Judge: PPL Montana, LLC (PPL) filed a complaint with the Surface Transportation Board, alleging the rail rates charged by intervenor BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) were unreasonably high.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Grainbelt Corp. v. Surface Transportation Board

    109 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1997

    Co. v. ICC, 736 F.2d 708 , 717 (D.C.Cir.1984). The Commission also has broad authority to impose protective conditions to govern mergers. 49 U.S.C. § 11344 (c); see Lamoille Valley R.R. v. … (quoting Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. Hodgson, 499 F.2d 467, 476 (D.C.Cir. 1974)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lambert v. Board of Com'rs of District of Columbia

    116 A.2d 926 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 23, 1955

    In Chappelle v. Board of Commissioners of Dist. of Col., D.C.Mun.App., 110 A.2d 697 , we held this to be proper.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Economides v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    954 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2008

    V. … v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board

    133 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1955

    This is a proceeding in which the plaintiff American President Lines, Ltd., a subsidized shipping operator, seeks a declaratory judgment against the Federal Maritime Board and its individual members. … The contention of the plaintiff here is that this determination of the Board was discriminatory and invalid, and should be so declared by this Court by a declaratory judgment.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    194 F.2d 339 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1952

    Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, April 6, 1949 [State Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 84 U.S.App.D. … Supreme Court in the case of Ashbacker Radio Corporation v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    299 A.2d 145 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1973

    See Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532 (1972) (hereinafter Brewington /). … More recently in Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470 (1972), this court, relying on Allentuck and Palmer v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • ANC 2C v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage and Cannabis Board

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 2025

    See generally Colao v. Cnty. … Petitioners’ reliance on Neill v. D.C. Public Employee Relations Board, 93 A.3d 229 (D.C. 2014) is similarly misplaced. There, we held that Sup. Ct. Agency Rev.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • William B. Andrews v. Railroad Retirement Board

    595 F.2d 676 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1978

    v. … Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 [, 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126, 140 (1938)].

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Levy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    570 A.2d 739 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1990

    See Draude v. … Power Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 455 A.2d 374, 377-78 (D.C.1982); Washington Urban League v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 295 A.2d 906, 908 (D.C.1972), quoting Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Hernandez v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 2026

    Fleischman v. D.C. Bd. Of Zoning Adjustment, 27 A.3d 554, 557 (D.C. 2011) (quoting Economides v. D.C. Bd. … See Gilmartin v. D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    231 F.2d 483 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 1956

    The legality of this experiment has been determined by this court in Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad v. … Eastern Airlines, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 185 F.2d 426, 428 , vacated 1950, 341 U.S. 901 , 71 S.Ct. 613 , 95 L.Ed. 1341 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Doughty v. United States Board of Parole

    782 F. Supp. 653 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1992

    See Doughty v. U.S. Board of Parole, App. No. 90-5276 (D.C.Cir. May 31, 1991) (per curiam) [ 946 F.2d 1564 (table)]. … BOARD OF PAROLES, ET.AL.” Motion of Appeal, filed August 27, 1990.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Saturn Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    476 F.2d 907 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 1973

    International Union, United Auto Workers v. NLRB, 126 U. S.App.D.C. 11, 373 F.2d 671 (1967). … On November 13, 1972 acting Chief Judge Wright granted an unopposed motion to consolidate the seven petitions for review that were in this court as a result of the second circuit’s transfer order. .Compare Skelly Oil Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Golden Holiday Tours v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    531 F.2d 624 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1976

    Petitioners sought Board review of the staff action, and on 16 August 1974 the Board granted the petition for review and affirmed the staff action. … Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 , 93 S.Ct. 705, 712 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147, 161 (1973); Southern Pac. Term. Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498, 515 , 31 S.Ct. 279, 283 , 55 L.Ed. 310, 316 (1911). See also DeFunis v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Wieck v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    383 A.2d 7 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1978

    ABC Board, D.C.App., 302 A.2d 235 (1973), and whether the conclusions of the Board flow rationally from these findings, Stewart v. BZA, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 516 (1973).’ Marjorie Webster Junior College, Inc. v. … Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 285 (1974).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Warriors v. National Labor Relations Board

    50 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 2002

    This cause was considered on the record compiled before the National Labor Relations Board and was argued by counsel. … It is *4 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied, and the order of the National Labor Relations Board is enforced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tschanneral v. District of Columbia Board of Education

    594 F. Supp. 407 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 1984

    . § 1983 , the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and the decision in Mills v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972). … Kelley v. Morris, 400 A.2d 1045, 1047 (D.C.App.1979). See also Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n. 4 (D.C.App.1976); Miller v. Spencer, 330 A.2d 250 , 251 n. 1 (D.C.App.1974).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Civil Aeronautics Board v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft

    591 F.2d 951 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 8, 1979

    pertaining to denied boarding (“bumping”) of passengers who have confirmed reserved space. … FTC v. Texaco, Inc., 180 U.S.App.D.C. 390, 407 , 555 F.2d 862 , 879 (en banc), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 974 , 97 S.Ct. 2940 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1977); SEC v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ahmed v. District of Columbia Hackers License Appeal Board

    501 A.2d 415 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1985

    Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410, 414 , 65 S.Ct. 1215, 1217 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 (1945); Dankman v. … Russell v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 402 A.2d 1231, 1234 (D.C.1979).

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.