Case law

Forter v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 23, 2021

(“Governor Brown”) and ODOC Director Colette Peters (together, “Defendants”). … Mot. to Stay at 3, ECF No. 3; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.)

Bond v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 2, 2021

On March 8, 2020, Governor Brown issued Executive Order 20-03 declaring a statewide emergency pursuant to ORS 401.165 et seq. in response to the outbreak of COVID-19 in Oregon. … Conn v. Gabbert, 526 U.S. 286, 290 (1999).

Hammond v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

121 Or. App. 343 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1993

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) issued on January 30, 1992. … See Scott v. OSP, 117 Or App 182 , 843 P2d 512 (1992); ORAP 4.35.

Konecny v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 29, 2021

Defendant Brown told them to use soap, water, and towels to decontaminate and discussed the requests with the Lieutenant on duty that night. Brown Decl. ¶ 8. … Clement v.

Coronado v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 13, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 2-3, ECF No. 9; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

King v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 13, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 2-3, ECF No. 9; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Eastgate Theatre, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

37 Or. App. 745 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1978

The Supreme Court in State ex rel Roberts v. … State ex rel Roberts v.

Parkerson v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · May 28, 2021

KATE BROWN et al., Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. … Agyeman v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986)).

Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

243 Or. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 25, 2011

The board denied relief on administrative review of the revocation order, and we later affirmed that decision, Murphy v. Board of Parole, 241 Or App 177 , 250 P3d 13 (2011). … Implicit in that discretionary provision is authorization for the board to impose a shorter term. See Cole v.

Maneatis v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · May 21, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 3, ECF No. 10; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Brunick v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · May 21, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 3, ECF No. 10; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Sansburn v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 23, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 2-3, ECF No. 9; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Sissell v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 23, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 2-3, ECF No. 9; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

143 Or. App. 605 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1996

The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision has petitioned for reconsideration of our previous opinion. Murphy v. Board of Parole, 140 Or App 642 , 915 P2d 489 (1996) (per curiam). … Because petitioner was afforded a later hearing on the Board’s decision to extend his parole release date, there is no need for us to determine whether the Board violated an applicable rule.

Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Board of Forestry

188 Or. App. 10 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 29, 2003

Therefore, it is an inexact term, and the board’s interpretation of it is reviewed as a matter of law, Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. … See, e.g., Fister v.

Troiano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

144 Or. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1996

To the Board, petitioner argued that if it had applied former OAR 255-75-090(2), his sentence would have been eight to twelve months. Petitioner failed to preserve his claim of error. See Woolstrum v. … Board of Parole, 141 Or App 332, 336 , 918 P2d 112 (1996).

Figueroa v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 6, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 3, ECF No. 9; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

McClure v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

236 Or. App. 606 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 11, 2010

See Christenson v. … Harrington, 923 F2d 1371 (9th Cir), cert den, 502 US 854 (1991), and Jones v. Cardwell, 686 F2d 754 (9th Cir 1982).

Wetmore v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 12, 2021

KATE BROWN, Defendant. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)).

Brown v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 100147b (or.tax 5-12-2010)

Oregon Tax Court · May 12, 2010

Brown participated on his own behalf; Ken Collmer appeared for Defendant. This appeal concerns residential property identified as Account R294557. … For tax year 2008-09, Plaintiff appealed to the Multnomah County Board of Property Tax Appeals (BOPTA). Defendant's RMV was sustained by BOPTA.