Case law

Lynn v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 26, 2019

Plaintiff claims that Brown named plaintiff as Brown’s legal guardian in the event that Brown was unable to manage her own affairs. Id. at 8-9. … removed as Brown’s guardian.

Lynn v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 25, 2019

See, e.g., Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Gaines v. Stenseng, 292 F.3d 1222, 1224 (10th Cir. 2002). … Plaintiff also claims that defendant has falsely alleged that plaintiff stole over $75,000 from Brown’s bank accounts. Id.

State Ex Rel. Board of Regents v. Livingston

76 O.B.A.J. 1045 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 2005

Authority v. … Bivins v. State ex rel.

Rheam v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma

161 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1933

It was so held in Linten v. Lucy Cobb Institute (Ga.) 45 S. E. 53 ; Bryant v. Whisenant (Ala.) 52 So. 525 , and State ex rel. Priest v. Regents of the University of Wisconsin (Wis.) 11 N. W. 472 . … Attorney General v.

Mathieu v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 23, 2019

See Brown v. … In Heck v.

County Board of Equalization v. Muskogee Industrial Finance Corp.

357 P.2d 224 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1960

The County Board of Equalization principally relies upon our decision in Board of County Commissioners, etc. v. … Plummer v. Davis, 169 Okl. 374 , 36 P.2d 938 .

Smith Ex Rel. State v. State Board of Equalization

630 P.2d 1264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1981

This Court in Draper v. … Edwards v. Childers, 102 Okl. 158 , 228 P. 472, 473 (1924); Menefee v. Askew, 25 Okl. 623 , 107 P. 159, 161 (1910). . This Court in Draper v.

Buchner v. Board of Com'rs of Hughes County

166 Okla. 274 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1933

In construing said provision, this court, in the ease of State v. State ex rel. … made. *277 A case very similar as to facts is the case of Blake v.

Trent Ex Rel. Trent v. Board of County Commissioners

755 P.2d 615 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1988

The road and the bridge are owned and maintained by the Board of County Commissioners of Johnston County (County or appellee). … Appellants assert that strict compliance with the statute is not necessary as long as there is substantial compliance citing Duesterhaus v. City of Edmond, 634 P.2d 720 (Okl.1981) and Reirdon v.

Miller v. Board of Com'rs of Beaver County

171 Okla. 553 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1935

Co. v. … McKee v. Adair County Election Board, 36 Okla. 258 , 128 P. 294 ; Kile v. Graham, 108 Okla. 179 , 235 P. 524 ; Harris v. Boggess, 113 Okla. 60 , 238 P. 477 .

Campbell v. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County

167 Okla. 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 20, 1934

The Mississippi Supreme Court, in the case of Board of Supervisors of Quitman County v. … To the same effect are Raley v. Umatilla County, 15 Ore. 172 , 13 P. 890 ; Hayward v. Davidson, 41 Ind. 212 ; New York Life Insurance Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, 106 Fed. 123 ; and Barnes v.

Bearden v. Oklahoma ex rel. Board of Regents

234 F. Supp. 3d 1148 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 10, 2017

Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma (“University”) alleging that the University violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (“Rehab Act”) when, while she … S.E.C. v. Shields, 744 F.3d 633, 640 (10th Cir. 2014).

Bostick v. Board of County Commissioners of Noble Co.

19 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1907

all reason by the city board of equalization, without authority of law and by the reason of a mistake-made by the city board, as evidenced by Exhibit A, hereto attached and made a part hereof. … jurisdiction as the inferior tribunal had, and can only investigate in a given case those propositions which were before the inferior court, and which the inferior court might have investigated and determined. 2 Cyc. 537; Cooper v.

Jack Lincoln Shops, Inc. v. State Dry Cleaners' Board

192 Okla. 251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1943

Cleaners & Dyers v. … Herrin v. Arnold, above; Croxton v. State, 186 Okla. 249 , 97 P. 2d 11 .

Nucholls v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa

560 P.2d 556 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 1977

Walton v. Donnelly, 83 Okl. 233 , 201 P. 367 (1921); Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County v. Grimes, 75 Okl. 219 , 182 P. 897 (1919). 5 . Oklahoma City v. … Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, 200 Okl. 285 , 193 P.2d 291 (1948); Oklahoma City v.

Board of County Com'rs of Lincoln County v. Robertson

35 Okla. 616 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1913

And that such order is appealable although no final judgment is rendered thereon, see Burdick, New Trials and Appeals, sec. 163; United States Express Co. v. State, 33 Okla. 370 , 125 Pac. 448 ; Bartholomew v. … The board acted within its jurisdiction in making the allowances, and there is no claim that they acted fraudulently. That the items were proper expenditures cannot be doubted. See Butler v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Excise Board

168 Okla. 519 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1934

Board of Commissioners of Logan County v. State ex rel. Short, Atty. Gen., 122 Okla. 268 , 254 P. 710 ; St. L.-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Morris, 143 Okla. 160 , 288 P. 306 ; Protest of C., R. I. & P. Ry. … Fulton v. State Election Board, 168 Okla. 446 , 33 P. (2d) 800 .

Board of County Commissioners of Greer Co. v. Henry

33 Okla. 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

See, also, Welsh v. R. H. Bramlet, 98 Cal. 219 , 33 Pac. 66 ; Kehn v. State of N. Y., 93 N. Y. 291 ; Jacobs v. United States, 41 Ct. Cl. 452 ; Board of County Com’rs v. … Burns, 3 Wyo. 691 , 29 Pac. 894 , 30 Pac. 415 ; Guthrie v. Board of County Com’rs, 7 Wyo. 95 , 50 Pac. 229 .

Board Com'rs Harper v. Boards of Com'rs of Woodward

27 Okla. 748 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 10, 1911

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board

141 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1930

Blackwood, 76 Okla. 175 , 184 Pac. 582 , and Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Sappington, 124 Okla. 16 , 253 Pac. 483 . … Co. v.