Case law

Huntsville City Board of Education v. Jacobs

194 So. 3d 929 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Dec 19, 2014

Section 16-24C-6(e) provides that “[djeference is [to be] given to the decision of the [Board]” by the hearing officer reviewing a decision of the Board. As we explained in Lambert v. … Wells v.

Jefferson County v. Brown

608 So. 2d 1375 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Oct 16, 1992

Brocato v. Brocato, 332 So.2d 722, 723 (Ala.1976). Moreover, Ala.Code 1975, § 34-3-21, vests in an attorney the authority to bind his or her client in any action or proceeding by any agreement in relation to such case. … In a factually different case, but on a similar point, our Supreme Court, in King v.

Holloway v. Water Works & Sewer Board

24 F. Supp. 3d 1112 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 15, 2014

Bd. of Educ. v. … Because the Board’s motion for summary judgment rests solely on this argument, it is due to be DENIED. . In Bonner v.

Chance v. Board of Pardons & Paroles

875 So. 2d 1236 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Apr 25, 2003

Ex Parte Brown

581 So. 2d 436 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 15, 1991

Code 1975, § 12-16-11 ; Williams v. State , 520 So.2d 179 (Ala.Cr.App. 1987); Jones v. State , 488 So.2d 48 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Pease v. City of Montgomery , 333 So.2d 221 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976). … Moreover, the charge was effectively a general affirmative charge, which stated, in effect, that if the jury believed the State's evidence, then it should convict Brown. See, e.g., Austin v.

Bastian v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

708 So. 2d 187 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jul 11, 1997

See Finch v. Finch, 468 So.2d 151 (Ala.1985); Smith v. State, 660 So.2d 1820 (Ala.Civ.App.1995). … Cox v. Poer, 45 Ala.App. 295, 297 , 229 So.2d 797, 798-99 (Ala.Civ.App.1969) (quoting DuBay v. Crane, 240 Md. 180 , 213 A.2d 487 (1965)). See also Ex parte City of Huntsville, 684 So.2d 123 (Ala.1996); Crowder v.

Alves v. Board of Educ. for Guntersville

922 So. 2d 129 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 12, 2005

In Lauderdale County Board of Education v. … City of Birmingham v.

Alabama State Milk Control Board v. Graham

250 Ala. 49 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 18, 1947

Franklin v. State ex rel. Alabama State Milk Control Board, 232 Ala. 637 , 169 So. 295 ; Taylor v. State, 237 Ala. 178 , 186 So. 463 ; Thompson v. Alabama State Milk Control Board, 241 Ala. 100 , 1 So.2d 381 . … Donoghue v. Bunkley, 247 Ala. 423 , 25 So. 2d 61 ; Morgan v. Board of School Com’rs. of Mobile County, 248 Ala. 22 , 26 So.2d 108 .

Coca-Cola Co. v. Deacon Brown Bottling Co.

200 F. 105 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Feb 20, 1912

J.B. ex rel. Brown v. Amerson

890 F. Supp. 2d 1299 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Aug 30, 2012

Pearson v. … Graham v.

Alston v. Marengo County Board of Education

224 Ala. 676 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 14, 1932

Lathrop Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Lumber. Co., 207 Ala. 522 , 93 So. 427 ; Martin v. Alabama Power Co., 208 Ala. 212 , 94 So. 76 ; State ex rel. Wright v. Kemp, 205 Ala. 201 , 87 So. 836 ; Wise v. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ„ concur.

Turner v. Mobile County Personnel Board

689 So. 2d 168 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 10, 1997

County Personnel Board (Board). … We would note that “ ‘[t]he inquiry in the circuit court is neither enlarged nor diminished by appeal.’ ” City of Homewood v. Caffee, 400 So.2d 375, 377 (Ala.1981) (quoting Nelson v.

State Ex Rel. Highsmith v. Brown Service Funeral Co.

236 Ala. 249 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 9, 1938

Brassell v. … Perkins v.

Vincent v. County Board of Education

222 Ala. 216 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1931

And in Bryant v. Whisenant, 167 Ala. 325 , 52 So. 525 , 140 Am. St. Rep. 41 , and again in Kennedy v. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Congleton v. Jackson County Board of Education

4 So. 3d 1099 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 22, 2008

Thus, this Court has held that county boards of education are immune from tort actions. See Brown v. Covington *1103 County Bd. of Educ., 524 So.2d 628, 625 (Ala.1988); Hutt v. … This evidence does not create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the Board was a party to a contract with Kaitlyn. In Brown v.

Lehmann v. State Board of Public Accountancy

208 Ala. 185 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 29, 1922

Parke v. Bradley, 204 Ala. 455 , 86 South. 28 ; Railroad Commission v. A. N. Railway Co., 182 Ala. 357 , 62 South. 740 . … Ewing v. St. Louis, 5 Wall. 413 , 18 L. Ed. 657 ; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505 , 23 Sup. Ct. 390, 47 L. Ed. 563 .

Henry v. Jefferson County Personnel Board

519 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Feb 23, 2007

for employment decisions rendered during his tenure as Receiver of the Board (see Bowie v. … [including] assessing] the present organizational structure of the Personnel Board” (United States v.

Lee v. Alabama Board of Nursing

33 So. 3d 605 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 21, 2008

See Sayre v. … See, e.g., Klein v.

Mack v. Wilcox County Board of Education

218 So. 3d 774 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 2, 2016

See Board of Sch. Comm’rs of Mobile Cty. v. … See also Poiroux v.

Warren v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

383 So. 2d 179 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Dec 5, 1979

The petitioner, Board of Zoning Adjustment of Hueytown, Alabama, hereinafter referred to as the “Board,” petitions this court for a writ of certiorari or in the alternative for a writ of mandamus to be issued to. … Robert Warren . . . addressed the Board and Stated that he was in opposition to this substation being enlarged At the Board’s second meeting, i. e.