Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.15s

  • In re Brown

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2024

    Brown, pro se. Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, with whom Hamilton P. Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, was on the brief, for appellee. … Brown argues that the Board erred because it did not consider his engagement agreement with Mr. Bahri.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • William J. Goodson v. Railroad Retirement Board

    595 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1979

    Rivas v. Weinberger, 475 F.2d 255, 258 (5th Cir. 1973). … But the Board must demonstrate that a claimant can engage in “(substantial services with reasonable regularity in some competitive employment .” Rivas v. Weinberger, supra, 475 F.2d at 258 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Symons v. Chrysler Corp. Loan Guarantee Board

    488 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1980

    United States v. Conlon, No, 79-2283, slip op. at 8, (D.C.Cir. April 16, 1980). In Zeigier Coal Co. v. … See United States v. Babcock, 530 F.2d 1051 (D.C.Cir. 1976).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board Union & National Labor Relations Board Professional Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

    313 F. App'x 328 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hicks v. National Labor Relations Board

    880 F.2d 1396 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 1989

    The ALJ again found jurisdiction, and this time the Board affirmed, limiting its discussion of jurisdiction to a half-page footnote. Hicks v. AFGE Local 3430, 290 NLRB No. 84 (1988). … We therefore remand the case to the Board, for further action either consistent with its existing precedents or for generation of a new jurisdictional rule. Compare NLRB v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Coumaris v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    660 A.2d 896 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1995

    Co. v. … As we stated in Dietrich v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Gropp v. District of Columbia Board of Dentistry

    606 A.2d 1010 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1992

    Nursing Home v. … First, we find no indication of any intentional delay by the Board. See Hallenbeck v. Kleppe, supra, 590 F.2d at 855 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re Brown

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2024

    Brown, pro se. Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, with whom Hamilton P. Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, was on the brief, for appellee. … Brown argues that the Board erred because it did not consider his engagement agreement with Mr. Bahri.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Conagra, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    117 F.3d 1435 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1997

    See International Woodworkers v. NLRB, 263 F.2d 483 , 485 (D.C.Cir.1959). In NLRB v. … United Steelworkers Local 14534 v. NLRB, 983 F.2d 240 , 244 (D.C.Cir.1993). Subsequently, however, in response to a trilogy of Seventh Circuit decisions, the Board underwent a “change of heart.” Id. First came NLRB v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Downtown Bid Services Corp.

    682 F.3d 109 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 2012

    , LLC v. … In NLRB v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    443 A.2d 507 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1981

    Lee v. … See Jameson’s Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 384 A.2d 412, 420-21 (1978); Hill v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Willard, Inc.

    98 F.2d 244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1938

    Respondent having failed to comply with the Board’s order, the Board petitioned this court pursuant to section 10 (e) of the act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e). … In the case of Webb, it would be hard to support any other finding than the one which the Board made. We hold that the Board’s order is valid and must be enforced. Petition granted.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Grainbelt Corporation v. Surface Transportation Board

    109 F.3d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1997

    Louis Mackall, V, Attorney, Surface Transportation Board, argued the cause for respondents, with whom Henri F. Rush, General Counsel, Joel I. Klein, Acting Assistant Attorney General, U.S. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • PPL Montana, LLC v. Surface Transportation Board

    437 F.3d 1240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 2006

    Before: GINSBURG , Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN , Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN . … BROWN , Circuit Judge: PPL Montana, LLC (PPL) filed a complaint with the Surface Transportation Board, alleging the rail rates charged by intervenor BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) were unreasonably high.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Norris, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    177 F.2d 26 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 1949

    F. of L. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1940, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 ; Inland Empire Dist. Council v. Millis, 1945, 325 U.S. 697 , 65 S.Ct. 1316 , 89 L.Ed. 1877 ; May Dept. Stores Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 1945, 326 U.S. 376, 388 , 66 S.Ct. 203 , 90 L.Ed. 145 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp., 1940, 308 U.S. 453, 459 , 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. 396 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Zemel v. Board of Governors

    918 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 1994

    Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 706 (D.C.Cir.1984). The order of proof is similar to that prescribed in McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. … See Nerenstone v. Barr, 784 F.Supp. 912, 915 (D.D.C.1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board

    133 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1955

    This is a proceeding in which the plaintiff American President Lines, Ltd., a subsidized shipping operator, seeks a declaratory judgment against the Federal Maritime Board and its individual members. … The contention of the plaintiff here is that this determination of the Board was discriminatory and invalid, and should be so declared by this Court by a declaratory judgment.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Salama v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

    578 A.2d 693 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1990

    Davidson v. District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 562 A.2d 109 (D.C.1989); Mannan v. District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 558 A.2d 329 (D.C.1989). … As this court stated in Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wheeler v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    395 A.2d 85 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1978

    See A.L.W., Inc. v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 338 A.2d 428 (1975); Palmer v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535 (1972). … See Citizen’s Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia ABC Board, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 861 (1973) (Board substantially complied with court’s order on remand). 10 . See Stewart v. D.C.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    287 A.2d 532 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1972

    National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 313, 317 , 438 F.2d 154, 158 (1970). … Allentuck v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board, D.C.App., 261 A.2d 826, 832-833 (1969).

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.