Case law

Kile v. Graham

108 Okla. 179 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1925

On Odtobe-r 4, 1924, Shawnee Brown, the county superintendent of public instruction of Love county, tendered his. resignation ito the hoard of county commissioners of said county, and such resignation was by said board duly … Louis County Ct. v. Sparks, 10 Mo. 117 , 45 Am. Dec. 355 ; State ex rel. Mason v. Paterson, 35 N. J. L. 190; Lyon v. Granville Co., 120 N. C. 237 , 26 S. E. 929 ; Meredith v. Board of Supervisors, 50 Cal. 43 ; People v.

First National Bank in Wichita v. Board of Ed.

174 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1935

In seeking personal judgment against the board of education plaintiffs rely upon City of Drumright v. McCormick, 118 Okla. 140 , 247 P. 25 . … City of Drumright v. Exchange National Co., 164 Okla. 158 , 23 P. (2d) 213 ; Board *165 of Trustees of Incorporated Town of Broken Bow v.

Bancroft v. Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists

202 Okla. 108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1949

Berlandi v. Reimer, D. C. N. Y., 30 F. Supp. 767, 768 , it was stated that issuing checks with intent to defraud was an offense involving moral turpitude. … The action of the Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists of Oklahoma in revoking the license of Dr. Levy Harry Bancroft is hereby affirmed. DAVISON, C.J., ARNOLD, V. C.

Clinton v. State Ex Rel. Logan County Election Board

72 O.B.A.J. 1933 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 2001

through August 18, 1998, when the Board fired her. … Eddy v. Brown, 1986 OK 3, ¶ 7 , 715 P.2d 74, 77 . See also Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. Thompson, 1998 OK 30, ¶¶ 13-21 , 958 P.2d 128, 138-43 .

Robberson v. Board of Com'rs of Noble County

109 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1924

The petition was filed April 28, 1923, by the ’board of county commissioners. As grounds for the removal the petition alleged mental disease or derangement, habitual neglect of duty, and oppression in office.

Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners

468 P.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1970

Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 274 P.2d 1021 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034 . … Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 ; Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 ; National Surety Co. v. Sand Springs State Bank, 74 Okl. 176 , 177 P. 574 .

Flint v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County

188 Okla. 628 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1941

The same propositions raised by the plaintiff in this case were raised by the same attorney in the case of Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County, v. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. GIBSON, J., absent.

Metcalf v. Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision

64 O.B.A.J. 694 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1992

All appeals from a decision of the Oklahoma Board of Medical Examiners lie exclusively to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Board of Medical Examiners v. Naifeh, 598 P.2d 225 (Okl.1979), DiMauro v. … free expression, citing Hennessey v.

Barry v. Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County

173 Okla. 645 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1935

The Supreme Court of Vermont, in Harris v. … And in Gilman v. Tucker, 128 N. Y. 190 , 28 N.

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. Fink

45 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Attached to the motion is a certificate of the county clerk to the effect that the minutes and records of the board of county commissioners do not show that they authorized the appeal. Counsel cite Kingfisher Co. v. … See Leedy v.

Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee Co. v. Armstrong

127 Okla. 260 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 1, 1927

We believe the better rule to be followed herein is that laid down in Smith et al. v. Board of Co. Com’rs of Rogers County, supra : Fast et al. v. Rogers, Co. Treas., supra : Black v. Geissler, supra; Board of Co. … Com’rs of Muskogee Co. v. Dudding. supra ; Board of Com’rs of Sequoyah Co. v.

Board of Com'rs of Atoka County v. Taylor

90 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1923

The board of county commissioners, plaintiff in error, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Upon the authority of Rice et al. v. … Swartz et al., No. 14090, in which an opinion this day has been filed, 90 Okla. 16 , 215 Pac. 605 , and the cases of Board of Com’rs of Craig County v. Germo Mfg. Co., 71 Oklahoma, 176 Pac. 902 , Sequoyah County v.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma County Excise Board

618 P.2d 915 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1980

In making this argument, the Appellant Cities rely upon Smartt v. Board of County Com’rs of Craig County, 67 Okl. 141 , 169 P. 1101 (1917). … In State Insurance Fund v. Board of Com’rs of Creek County, 195 Okl. 66 , 155 P.2d 542 (1945), we clarified our holding in Smartt, supra.

Paden v. Board of County Commissioners

846 F. Supp. 2d 1217 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 9, 2012

Introduction 1 Plaintiff was an at-will employee for the District 1 of the defendant Texas County Board of County Commissioners (“County”). Keeling served as plaintiffs foreman. … Bass v. Richards, 308 F.3d 1081, 1088 (10th Cir.2002).

County Election Board of Coal County v. Robinson

352 P.2d 920 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1960

He cites Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okl. 169 , 170 P.2d 200 ; and Love v. State Election Board (Patterson), 197 Okl. 165 , 170 P.2d *923 191 , in support of his contention. … The case of Stafford v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 132 , 218 P.2d 617 , is determinative of this issue. In that case Stafford tendered a filing for the Legislature for the 1950 Democratic Primary.

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Education

124 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

In the case of Board of Education of City of Alva v. … Lynch was still treasurer at that time by reason of the proviso to section 10, art. 23, Const., and by reason of the failure of the board to act under section 10387, Comp.

Brown v. Dowling

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 6, 2020

See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986); Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir. 1993). … Gee v. Pacheco, 627 F.3d 1178, 1192 (10th Cir. 2010). See also Carter v. Troutt, 175 Fed.

McGeisey v. Board of Com'rs. of Seminole County

45 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1914

From this judgment plaintiff appeals. *11 Every proposition involved in this ease has been recently decided by this court in the cast of Marcy v. … Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County et al., ante, 144 Pac. 611 . On the authority of that ease, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded. See, also, Tiger v. Western Inv.

Ward v. Board of Co. Com'rs, Okfuskee Co.

114 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1926

In re Courthouse of Okmulgee County, 58 Okla. 683 , 161 Pac. 200 ; Smith v. Board of Com’rs of Rogers County, 26 Okla. 819 . 110 Pac. 669 ; Wood et al. v. Bangs et al., 1 Dak. 179 , 46 N. W. 586 .” … In the case of Hull v. Board of County Commissioners (Ind.) 143 N.

Benedict v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

161 Okla. 50 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1932

To the same effect is Raley v. Umatilla County (Ore.) 13 P. 890 . In Myatt v. Ponca City Land & Imp. … See, also, the following authorities: Barnes v. Multnomah Co. (C. C. Ore.) 145 Fed. 695 ; Board of Sup’rs Stritze (Miss.) 13 So. 36 ; and authorities cited in 7 R. C. L. 567.