Case law

Board of Ed., Plainfield v. Cooperman

105 N.J. 587 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 15, 1987

Board of Educ. of City of Plainfield v. Cooperman, 209 N.J.Super. 174 . … Hinfey v. Matawan Regional Board of Education, 77 N.J. 514, 525 (1978). See, e.g., Abbott v. Burke, 100 N.J. 269, 301 (1985) (power to hear a challenge to the Public School Education Act of 1975); Hinfey v.

Lowenstein v. Newark Board of Education

35 N.J. 94 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 22, 1961

The prior occasions are reported in Laba v. Newark Board of Education, 23 N. J. 364 (1957) and Lowenstein v. Newark Board of Education, 33 N. J. 277 (1960). … Board of Education of San *100 Francisco Unified School District v. Mass, 47 Cal. 2d 494 , 304 P. 2d 1015 (Sup. Ct. 1956); Board of Public Education School District of Philadelphia v.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

60 N.J.L. 392 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1897

Whether or not they had forfeited their rights was a question which could be determined by the board only by the exercise of a qua si-judicial function. … Vanatta v. Morristown, 5 Vroom 445; Traction Company v. Board of Works, 27 Id. 431; Connolly v. Freeholders, 28 Id. 286.

Board of Education v. Kraft

274 N.J. Super. 211 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1994

In Board of Education v. … See Board of Educ. v. Gateway Reg. High Sch.

Kirkpatrick v. State Board of Assessors

57 N.J.L. 53 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1894

New Jersey Southern Railroad Co. v. Railroad Commissioners, 12 Vroom 235 . This conclusion disposes of all the reasons relied on for setting-aside this assessment, except the first. … The facts set out in the state of the case agreed on show that this company was a manufacturing company carrying on business in this state, within the decision of Phonograph Company v. Board of Assessors, 25 Vroom 430 .

Smith v. Board of Commissioners

5 N.J. Misc. 390 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1927

The cases of Armitage v. Newark, 86 N. J. L. 5; Tice v. Long Branch, 98 Id. 214, are not in point on the facts. Our research has revealed no case in which this point has been directly considered. *391 Second. … The cases of McCarty v. Boulevard Commissioners, 91 N. J. L. 142; affirmed, 92 Id. 519; Atlantic Gas, &c., Co. v. Atlantic City, 73 Id. 360, should be applied.

Gish v. Board of Education

74 N.J. 251 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1977

Ricca v. Board of Commissioners

1 N.J. Super. 139 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 27, 1948

Board of Commissioners of Union City, 130 N.J. Law 1 (Sup.Ct. 1943), 30 Atl. (2d) 892 , affirmed 130 N.J. Law 496 (E. A. 1943), 33 Atl. (2d) 872 (drug store); Starkey v. Atlantic City, 132 N.J. … Law 27 (Sup.Ct. 1944), 38 Atl. (2d) 198 (drug store); Amodio v. Board of Commissioners of West New York, 133 N.J. Law 220 (Sup.Ct. 1945), 43 Atl. (2d) 889 (barber shop). Cf. Crawford's Clothes, Inc., v.

Michaelis v. Board of Fire Commissioners

49 N.J.L. 154 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1886

L., p. 130), no power was vested in the board to make the transfer. … Inasmuch as the power to appoint and remove officers was (until the act of 1885) lodged in the board of each year without any restriction, except such as the board of that year might adopt, no resolution of a board of 1881

Brown v. Brann & Stuart Co.

20 N.J. Misc. 405 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Aug 10, 1942

Holzworth v. Hedden Iron Construction Co., 1 N. J. Mis. R. 381; Bernstein Furniture Co. v. Kelly, 115 N. J. L. 500; 180 Atl. Rep. 832 . … Gamon Meter Co. v. Sims, 114 N. J. L. 590; 178 Atl. Rep. 92 ; Hercules v. Nieratko, supra; Allen v. City of Millville, 87 N. J. L. 356; 95 Atl. Rep. 130 ; affirmed, 88 N. J. L. 693; 96 Atl. Rep. 1101 ; Farrel v.

Colantoni v. Board of Education

329 N.J. Super. 545 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 2000

Div. v. Director, Div. … Impey v. Board of Educ. of Borough of Shrewsbury, 142 N.J. 388 , 662 A.2d 960 (1995).

New Jersey Property Liability Guaranty Assoc. v. Brown

174 N.J. Super. 629 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 1980

See Neal v. Celina Mutual Ins. Co., 522 S.W.2d 179 (Ky.1975). … Company v.

Jaclyn Thompson v. Board of Trustees, Teachers'

449 N.J. Super. 478 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 2017

Patterson, supra, 194 N.J. at 45-47 (quoting Brunell v. … See Turner v. Comm'r of Soc.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State

159 N.J. 565 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 1999

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State, 311 N.J.Super. 637, 642-43 , 710 A.2d 1060 (Law Div.1997). … Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State, 311 N.J.Super. 587, 589 , 710 A.2d 1035 (App.Div.1998). The panel also focused on the phrase “certain judicial costs.” See ibid.

Shapiro v. Board of Education

3 N.J. Misc. 406 · Commissioner of Education, N.J. · Apr 7, 1925

The decisions of tins department, as. well as those of the *407 supreme court, notably that of Davis v. … “if a board of education shall not have made rules, and regulations as aforesaid, then no contract between such board of education and a teacher shall be valid'undess the same be in writing * * * in triplicate, signed by

Karas v. Board of Adjustment

155 N.J. Super. 39 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 1977

A. 40:55D-17(a) (2) provides that an appeal may be taken on a final decision of the board of adjustment or planning board if permitted by local ordinance. … The statute and local ordinance specifically states that an appeal may be taken to the governing body which involves an approval of a board of adjustment or planning board.

Milliken v. Board of Freeholders

14 N.J. Misc. 58 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Dec 11, 1935

Board of Education v. Cuff

37 N.J. 54 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 12, 1962

Dornbusch v. Board Adjustment, Newark

117 N.J.L. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 22, 1937

Koch v. Board of Health

7 N.J. Misc. 589 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1929

The case was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment of nonsuit, as to the township of Midland, a dismissal of the action as against the board of health, and a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Frederick … Thiem talked about the emergency that existed, whereby some three hundred families were without water due to the orders of the state and local boards of health, and at the conversation the defendant told the plaintiff he