Case law

Bell v. National Labor Relations Board

259 F.3d 719 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 2001

See Detroit Edison Co. v. NLRB, 440 U.S. 301, 303 (1979); Country Ford Trucks, Inc. v. NLRB, 229 F.3d 1184, 1191 (D.C. … Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 361 (1998); see NLRB v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc., 494 U.S. 775, 778 (1990).

Brown v. Upper Marlboro Town Police

360 F. App'x 163 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief....” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

192 F.2d 417 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 27, 1951

These are petitions to review 1 an order of the Civil Aeronautics Board. … We had the same general problem before us in United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 5 and the Supreme Court adverted to it in United States v.

McGrady v. Mabus

635 F. Supp. 2d 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2009

Goland v. CIA 607 F.2d 339, 350 (D.C.Cir.1978). … Id.; Coastal States Gas Corp. v.

Taylor v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

308 A.2d 230 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1973

In Palmer v. … See 3 Anderson § 14.45 and compare Wilcox v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 17 N.Y.2d 249 , 270 N.Y.S.2d 569 , 217 N.E.2d 633 (1966).

Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Education

359 A.2d 28 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1976

v. … Appellant sued the Board of Higher Education and the individual Board members for money damages. The Board itself may not be a suable entity since no statute confers on it the status of a legal entity, see Miller v.

Faulkenstein v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

727 A.2d 302 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1999

See Williamson v. … V.

Brown v. Howard County Police Department

358 F. App'x 186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 2009

See, e.g., Ciralsky v. CIA 355 F.3d 661, 668 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Schiffmann v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

302 A.2d 235 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1973

V, 1972), the Board made findings of fact from which it was concluded that the applicant met the requirements of the Act, D.C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a)6 (Supp. … The contention that the Board failed to make the finding required by D. C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a)6 (Supp. V, 1972), is clearly without merit.

Brockton Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board

294 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 2002

Workers v. NLRB, 215 F.3d 11, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2000).  The Hospital challenges all the Board's determinations that it violated s 8(a)(1). … Galloway Co. v. NLRB, 856 F.2d 275, 280-81 (D.C.

Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of Dist. of Columbia

160 A.2d 100 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1960

Raleigh City Board of Education, D.C.E.D.N.C., 164 F.Supp. 853 , affirmed 4 Cir., 265 F.2d 95 ; United States ex rel. Chin Cheung Nai v. Corsi, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 55 F.2d 360 ; Fox v. … See also Reilly v. Pinkus, 338 U.S. 269 , 70 S.Ct. 110 , 94 L.Ed. 63 . Appellate courts usually lean heavily on findings of administrative boards, as they do on judges’ findings and jury verdicts.

Salsbery v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

318 A.2d 894 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1974

Our decision in Palmer v. … Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532 (1972).

Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

598 F.2d 250 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 1979

. § 1486 and Seaboard & Western Airlines v. CAB, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 78 , 183 F.2d 975 (1950); Frontier Airlines v. CAB, 142 U.S. App.D.C. 124, 439 F.2d 634 (1971); Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. … NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333, 350 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 (1938); Tashof v. FTC, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 274, 437 , F.2d 707, 713 (1970); Kuhn v.

Kerkam v. District of Columbia Board of Education

672 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 1987

. § 1983 , the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and the decision in Mills v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972). … In addition, the Court concludes that the District of Columbia Board of Education is not a suable entity and must therefore be dismissed as a party. See Tschanneral v.

Jackson Hospital Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

257 F.R.D. 302 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2009

NLRB v. … E.g., Bauman v. Jacobs Suchard, Inc., 136 14 F.R.D. 460, 461 (N.D. Ill. 1990); Gormin v. Brown-Forman Corp., 133 F.R.D. 50, 53 (M.D. Fla. 1990); see also EEOC v.

Railroad Retirement Board v. Duquesne Warehouse Co.

149 F.2d 507 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1945

In the case of Duquesne Warehouse Co. v. … McCaughn v. Hershey Chocolate Co., 1931, 283 U.S. 488, 493, 494 , 51 S.Ct. 510 , 75 L.Ed. 1183 . 4 Cir. 1944, 144 F.2d 130 . Skidmore v.

Spevak v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

407 A.2d 549 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1979

The Board correctly noted that it was under no duty to protect existing licenses from competition. Clark’s Liquors, Inc. v. D. C. ABC Board, D.C.App., 274 A.2d 414 (1971). … Kopff v. D. C. ABC Board, D.C.App., 381 A.2d 1372, 1384 (1977) (emphasis in original).

Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board

492 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 20, 1974

NLRB v. Auburn Rubber Co., 10 Cir., 384 F.2d 1 (1967); Ramsey v. NLRB, supra note 1, 327 F.2d 784 . See also language favorable to the Spielberg policy in NLRB v. … Assn of Machinists & Aerospace Wkrs v. Fraser & Johnston Co., 9 Cir., 454 F.2d 88, 91 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 920 , 92 S.Ct. 1775 , 32 L.Ed.2d 119 (1972); NLRB v.

In re Brown

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 2024

Brown, pro se. Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, with whom Hamilton P. Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, was on the brief, for appellee. … Brown argues that the Board erred because it did not consider his engagement agreement with Mr. Bahri.

Symons v. Chrysler Corp. Loan Guarantee Board

488 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1980

United States v. Conlon, No, 79-2283, slip op. at 8, (D.C.Cir. April 16, 1980). In Zeigier Coal Co. v. … See United States v. Babcock, 530 F.2d 1051 (D.C.Cir. 1976).