Case law

Brown v. Brown

177 Cal. App. 2d 387 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 1960

Defendant husband appeals from an interlocutory judgment of divorce rendered in favor of plaintiff-respondent Erma Marie Brown. … (Leupe v. Leupe, 21 Cal. 2d 145 , 147 et seq. [ 130 P.2d 697 ]. See also Gould v. Superior Court, 47 Cal.App. 197, 200 [ 191 P. 56 ]; Abbott v. Superior Court, supra; Klebora v.

Judd v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2

278 N.Y. 200 · New York Court of Appeals · May 24, 1938

A similar argument was advanced in Smith v. Donahue ( 202 App. Div. 656 ), in State ex rel. Traub v. Brown *213 (supra), and in Williams v. … Traub v. Brown (supra). In the Borden case the minority presented the better-reasoned opinion, in accord with the reasoning in Smith v.

In Re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against O’Toole

141 Ohio St. 3d 355 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 24, 2014

Id., citing Brown v. Hartlage, 456 U.S. 45, 61-62 , 102 S.Ct. 1523 , 71 L.Ed.2d 732 (1982). … Brown, v. Hartlage at 60 .

Brown v. Brown

15 Haw. 308 · Hawaii Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1903

, in which it was decided' that the said Irene owned said property in fee (See Brown v. … Baker, 10 Haw. 543 , and the decision in question, in Brown v. Brown, 11 Haw. 47 ), still was the defect such as to make the decision absolutely void?

Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

561 Pa. 462 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 18, 2000

Waugh v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 558 Pa. 400, 737 A.2d 733 (1999); 2 Pa.C.S. § 704. … Metropolitan Edison Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 553 Pa. 177 , 718 A.2d 759 (1998).

Brown v. Brown

87 W. Va. 257 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1920

v. … Porter v. Marshall, 67 W. Va. 673 ; citing the prior ease of Machir v. Sehon, 14 W. Va. 777 .

DeSouza-Brown v. Brown

38 A.D.3d 888 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 2007

Rochester, 26 AD3d 387, 388 [2006]; Matter of Kravitz v Kravitz, 18 AD3d 874, 875 [2005]; Matter of Zieran v Marvin, 2 AD3d 870, 872 [2003]; Matter of Cutrone v Cutrone, 225 AD2d 767, 768 [1996]). … v Laland, 4 AD3d 529, 530 [2004]; Matter of Topper v Topper, 271 AD2d 613 [2000]).

Brown v. Brown

112 N.H. 410 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Nov 3, 1972

She relies upon Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 , 28 L. Ed. 2d 113 , 91 S. … Waiver of the rule is within the authority of the court (Stiles v.

McElroy v. State

469 So. 2d 1337 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 8, 1985

Texas v. Brown , 460 U.S. at 746 , 103 S.Ct. at 1545 (Powell, J., concurring) citing United States v. Cortez , 449 U.S. 411 , 418 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981). … Texas v. Brown , 460 U.S. at 738 , 103 S.Ct. at 1540 .

Brown v. Brown

24 N.J. Super. 198 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1953

BROWN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD I. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 3, 1952. Decided January 5, 1953. *200 Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and CONLON. … Perlman v. Perlman , above; Kempson v. Kempson, 61 N.J. Eq. 303, 311 .

Masterson v. Board of Zoning Appeals

233 Va. 37 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Mar 6, 1987

V. … Knowlton v. Browning-Ferris, 220 Va. 571, 574 , 260 S.E.2d 232, 235 (1979).

Brown v. Brown

654 S.E.2d 832 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008

Brown v. Brown

122 A.D. 576 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 1907

Brown, the widow of the decedent, as trustee of an express trust, she being a beneficiary, was valid. The firm, name of the copartnership was Brown & Seccomb. … Brown and "William Harold Brown in the said firm, except their special capital contributed as aforesaid, and any increase and interest due thereupon, shall cease.”

Tuckenberry v. Board of Parole

365 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2019

The board 646 Tuckenberry v. … In Ayers v.

Brown v. Brown

984 So. 2d 1251 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 30, 2008

984 So.2d 1251 (2008) BROWN v. BROWN. No. 1D07-6589. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 30, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Brown v. Brown

143 A.D.2d 248 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 29, 1988

Although the right of recovery for the alleged improper actions of the plaintiff belongs to the corporation, the claims can be brought in the defendant Leila Brown’s name (see, e.g., Bertoni v Catucci, 117 AD2d 892 ; Conant … v Schnall, 33 AD2d 326 ).

Brown v. Brown

263 Ark. 189 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 27, 1978

In Hendrix v. … Searcy College, supra, that inasmuch as there was no fiduciary relationship existing, the insurance coverage did not inure to the benefit of the Board of Directors of Searcy College. In Barner v.

Brown v. Brown

45 S.C. 408 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Oct 21, 1895

We fear the case of State v. Lake, 30 S. … Brown, deceased..

Brown v. Brown

231 Ga. 195 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Oct 4, 1973

This appeal is from a judgment of the Superior Court of Wayne County changing the custody of three minor children from their mother Kay Vickers Brown to their father Horace Jack Brown.

Brown v. . Brown

41 N.Y. 507 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1869

Brown, should be charged with the payment of all the debts of the testator. 2d. … The case of Hoes v. Van Hoesen (1 Comst., 120), is in harmony with this view.