Case law

Nelson Edwards v. Michael Jolliff-Blake

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 1, 2018

  that  constitutional  right  was  clearly  established  at  the  time  of  the  alleged  violation.”  …   immunity);  Junkert,  610 F.3d at 370 (concluding officers were entitled to qualified  immunity based on  their reasonable  belief that  the  affidavit  established probable cause even though it left “much to be de‐ sired”)

Nunes v. Stephens

District Court, E.D. California · May 17, 2021

Defendants appealed the denial of qualified immunity. 1 On December 29, 2020, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion that reversed this Court’s 2 denial of qualified immunity. See Nunes v. … Raemisch, 864 F.3d 1071, 1078-79 (10th Cir. 2017) (holding that a prior published opinion could be read narrowly or 28 expansively and was too ambiguous to constitute “clearly established law” for purposes of qualified

Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Keynetics, Inc.

422 F. Supp. 2d 523 · District Court, D. Maryland · Feb 14, 2006

Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299 , 116 S.Ct. 834 , 133 L.Ed.2d 773 (1996) (qualified immunity defense may be raised at both the motion to dismiss and summary judgment stages). … Case law clearly establishes that CDA immunity applies even where an ISP knew of its customers’ potentially illegal activity. The Fourth Circuit in Zeran explained why.

Sims v. Figueroa

District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 27, 2019

Qualified Immunity Defendant Figueroa alternatively asserts that he is entitled to qualified immunity. … As to qualified immunity, the Eleventh Circuit has stated: To invoke qualified immunity, a public official must first demonstrate

Bledsoe v. Board Cty Comm. Jefferson KS

53 F.4th 589 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Nov 15, 2022

was clearly established. … The majority cites Shaw, without further elaboration, to hold that Appellants “are entitled to qualified immunity on Bledsoe’s failure-to-intervene claim because such a claim was not clearly established in 1999.”

Vreeland v. Olson

District Court, D. Colorado · Sep 16, 2021

Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … Accordingly, plaintiff has not carried his burden, in the face of the assertion of qualified immunity, to show that this right was clearly established in 5 Plaintiff argues for the first time in his response to the objection

Ronda Rae Jones v. Steven Naert

121 F.4th 558 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 12, 2024

To overcome Officer Steven Naert’s qualified-immunity defense, Ronda Jones must show not just that Naert violated the Constitution but also that the existing law clearly established this violation. … Rather, I would jump straight to the second qualified-immunity element: Naert did not violate clearly established law by concluding that he had probable cause to arrest Jones. See Beck v.

Mcevoy v. Spencer

124 F.3d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 11, 1997

Qualified Immunity 15 The defense of qualified immunity shields government agents "from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … A defendant pleading qualified immunity on a motion to dismiss is entitled to prevail if the allegations in the complaint fail to "state a claim of violation of clearly established law." Behrens v.

Williams v. City of Mount Vernon

428 F. Supp. 2d 146 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 14, 2006

Qualified Immunity 2 “The doctrine of qualified immunity shields police officers acting in their *154 official capacity from suits for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , unless their actions violate clearly-established rights … Qualified immunity can be established in three ways: (1) if defendant’s acts did not violate a clearly established constitutional right; (2) if it remains unclear as to whether an exception permitted such acts; and (3) if

Gordon v. Katz

934 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 17, 1996

It has also been clearly established that in order for legislative immunity to attach, the acts complained of must not only be substantively legislative but also procedurally legislative. Ryan v. … Plaintiffs argue that in order for legislative immunity to apply, accepted and established legislative procedures must be followed.

Blackman v. Butler

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 9, 2019

Qualified Immunity Defendants object to Judge Sison’s conclusion that they are not entitled to qualified immunity on Blackman’s due process claim with regard to his … Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 (2009) (to determine whether a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, a court must consider whether there is a violation of a constitutional right and whether that right was clearly established

Freeman v. Blair

862 F.2d 1330 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Dec 14, 1988

A. of our earlier decision, in which we held that Blair and Massa are not entitled to absolute immunity. See 793 F.2d at 171-73. We turn to the issues of qualified immunity. … Consequently, we must conclude that defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity with respect to this claim.

MOUNTAIN v. DOZIER

District Court, M.D. Georgia · Aug 17, 2021

Accordingly, when a defendant raises the defense of qualified immunity in a motion to dismiss, the court must take the plaintiff’s allegations as true and determine whether they assert a violation of a clearly established … Beach, 561 F.3d 1288, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (stating that to overcome qualified immunity a plaintiff must establish that “the officer’s conduct amounted to a constitutional violation” and “the right violated was clearly

Smith v. Siegelman

322 F.3d 1290 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 28, 2003

The qualified immunity defense may be raised and addressed on a motion to dismiss, and will be granted if the complaint "fails to allege the violation of a clearly established constitutional right." Chesser v. … B. 12 Qualified immunity protects government officials sued in their individual capacities as long as their conduct does not violate "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would

Derrick Sanderlin v. Jason Dwyer

116 F.4th 905 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 4, 2024

immunity because he did not violate clearly established law. … We now turn to the second prong of qualified immunity—whether the right violated was “clearly established.” We ask whether the law was “clearly established at the time an action occurred.”

Hudson v. Vasquez

941 S.W.2d 334 · Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Feb 6, 1997

In order to establish the “good faith” element of his claim to summary judgment based on official immunity, Hudson was required to prove that a reasonably prudent police officer could have believed that the force used was … The state law standard for analyzing the “good faith” element of official immunity is “derived substantially from the test that has emerged under federal immunity law for claims of qualified immunity in section 1983 cases

Beier v. City of Lewiston

354 F.3d 1058 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 14, 2004

The Supreme Court reasoned that the consequences of such an argument would be “intolerable,” because the qualified immunity right would be easily defeated as long as the complaint alleges violation of one clearly established … Clearly Established Right “ ‘[C]learly established’ for purposes of qualified immunity means that ‘[t]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates

Longval v. O'Toole

19 Mass. L. Rptr. 308 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Jan 28, 2005

Second, they assert that the complaint fails to allege facts constituting a violation of the plaintiffs “clearly established” rights, and that they therefore are entitled to qualified immunity. A. … Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 232 (1991) (right must be clearly established “at the time the defendant acted” to overcome defense of qualified immunity). The standard is purely an objective one. In Harlow v.

Ullery v. Bradley

949 F.3d 1282 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Feb 10, 2020

Defendant qualified immunity. … Defendant instead focuses on the second prong of the qualified-immunity inquiry, arguing he is entitled to qualified immunity because the law was not clearly established at the relevant time.

In re the Marriage of Nelson

Court of Appeals of Iowa · Oct 20, 2021

That year, Mick filed a pro se request to end his obligation because the children no longer qualified for support. … App. 2005) (“Clearly when a child support award is based on two qualifying children and one no longer qualifies, there has been a substantial change in circumstances.”); see also Iowa Code § 598.21C(1).