Case law

County Election Board of Coal County v. Robinson

352 P.2d 920 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1960

He cites Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okl. 169 , 170 P.2d 200 ; and Love v. State Election Board (Patterson), 197 Okl. 165 , 170 P.2d *923 191 , in support of his contention. … The case of Stafford v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 132 , 218 P.2d 617 , is determinative of this issue. In that case Stafford tendered a filing for the Legislature for the 1950 Democratic Primary.

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Board of Education

124 Okla. 101 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

In the case of Board of Education of City of Alva v. … Lynch was still treasurer at that time by reason of the proviso to section 10, art. 23, Const., and by reason of the failure of the board to act under section 10387, Comp.

Board of Com'rs of Garvin Co. v. Dennis

140 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1929

The board of county commissioners of Garvin county made an assessment for drainage purposes against said allotment in 1921, while still owned by A. B. Dennis, the original allottee. … In the very recent case of Grotkop v. W. W.

Ward v. Board of Co. Com'rs, Okfuskee Co.

114 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1926

In re Courthouse of Okmulgee County, 58 Okla. 683 , 161 Pac. 200 ; Smith v. Board of Com’rs of Rogers County, 26 Okla. 819 . 110 Pac. 669 ; Wood et al. v. Bangs et al., 1 Dak. 179 , 46 N. W. 586 .” … In the case of Hull v. Board of County Commissioners (Ind.) 143 N.

Hamilton v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 279 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914

The answer was practically the same as that made by the defendants in case No. 3906, ante (Zeigler v. … Board of Com’rs of Grant County), and reference is hereby made to the opinion in that case filed herewith, without repeating in detail .the provisions of the answer.

Vann v. Board of Ed., Town of Lenapah

102 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1924

Dougal v. White, 89 Okla. 107 , 213 Okla. 868 ; Anderson v. Lynch, 98 Okla. 137 , 221 Pac. 415 .

Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners

468 P.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1970

Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 274 P.2d 1021 ; Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, Okl., 285 P.2d 1034 . … Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 ; Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 ; National Surety Co. v. Sand Springs State Bank, 74 Okl. 176 , 177 P. 574 .

State Ex Rel. Rogers v. State Election Board

168 Okla. 441 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1934

Huff v. State Election Board, 168 Okla. 277 , 32 P. (2d) 920 . In designating a particular individual it should also distinguish him from others. … Howard v. Reford Bond, John W. Hayson and J. Wm.

Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County v. Fink

45 Okla. 121 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1914

Attached to the motion is a certificate of the county clerk to the effect that the minutes and records of the board of county commissioners do not show that they authorized the appeal. Counsel cite Kingfisher Co. v. … See Leedy v.

Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. City of Lawton

580 P.2d 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1978

V. Field and A. Bradford, the Civil Code of New York— Field Code). … One of the cases footnoted, Broadbent v. Ramsbotham, 11 Exch. 602, 25 L.J.

Holmes v. Board of Com'rs of Osage County

132 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1928

Adams v. Power, 87 Okla. 80 , 209 Pac. 395 .

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Shutler

139 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1929

But. in view of the holding of this court in State v. Blake, 139 Okla. 241 , 280 Pac. 833 , we are sure of the opinion that there is nothing now before this court for review. In State v. … However, from the holding in the case of State v.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma County Excise Board

618 P.2d 915 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1980

In making this argument, the Appellant Cities rely upon Smartt v. Board of County Com’rs of Craig County, 67 Okl. 141 , 169 P. 1101 (1917). … In State Insurance Fund v. Board of Com’rs of Creek County, 195 Okl. 66 , 155 P.2d 542 (1945), we clarified our holding in Smartt, supra.

Texas Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board

165 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1933

The rule stated in McMahan v. Board of Education, supra, was followed by the defendant in this case. … Board of Education, supra. We find no error in the judgment of the Court of Tax Review denying the protest, and the judgment of that court is in all things affirmed. RILEY, C. J., CÜLLISON, V. C.

Hill v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 2020

) ) STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Dept. of Human ) Case No. 20-CV-25-TCK-JFJ Services and CSE Agency; JUSTIN BROWN … Foote v.

Board of Com'rs of Osage County v. Prentice

183 Okla. 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1938

Co. v. … Board of Com’rs of Carter County et al., 160 Okla. 276 , 16 P.2d 104 ; Protest of Gulf Pipe Line Co., Seminole County, et al. v. Gulf Pipe Line Co., 168 Okla. 136 , 32 P.2d 42 , and Western Paint & Chemical Co. v.

Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. J. J. Brown Co.

76 Okla. 84 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 1919

J- Brown Company.” … Brown at once called Mr.

Scott v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin County

189 Okla. 601 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1941

Veazey Drug Co. v. Bruza, 169 Okla. 418 , 37 P. 2d 294 . … See Oswalt v. Lucas County, 222 Iowa, 1099 , 270 N. W. 847 ; Vaivida v. City of Grand Rapids, 264 Mich. 204 , 249 N. W. 826 , 88 A. L. R. 707; McBurney v.

McGeisey v. Board of Com'rs. of Seminole County

45 Okla. 10 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 24, 1914

From this judgment plaintiff appeals. *11 Every proposition involved in this ease has been recently decided by this court in the cast of Marcy v. … Board of County Commissioners of Seminole County et al., ante, 144 Pac. 611 . On the authority of that ease, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded. See, also, Tiger v. Western Inv.

Baker v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 13, 2020

Brown, et al., No. CIV-19-00217-JD, at 15 (W.D. Okla. … See generally 42 U.S.C. § 1396a; Brown v. Day, 555 F.3d 882, 885 (10th Cir. 2009).