Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

1.60s

  • Claybrook v. Board of Commissioners

    117 N.C. 456 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1895

    Claybrook v. Commissioners, 114 N. C., 453 . … Boyer v. Teague, 106 N. C., at page 633.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Don Plotkins Home Center

    347 N.C. 395 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.

    82 F. 351 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · Aug 2, 1897

    Brown, and conveyed by said Brown to said I. T. Avery, and also all tfie tracts of land field by conveyance from T. D. … Brown is dated 18th June, 1853, recorded 25th December, 18(56. That by Brown to Avery was recorded 6th August, 1873.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nichols v. Board of Councilmen

    125 N.C. 13 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1899

    Action for $37.50, the salary of plaintiff as one of the Board of Oouncilmen of defendant. This amount is conceded, if plaintiff is entitled to recover. … This is his right and the Board of Oouncilmen are powerless to divest him of it by any resolution. Affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ballenger Paving Company, Inc.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 2, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Health v. . Lewis

    196 N.C. 641 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 13, 1929

    In Clark v. Lawrence, 59 N. … In Board of Health v. Commissioners, 173 N. C., 250 , 91 S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Queen v. Board of Commissioners

    193 N.C. 821 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1927

    The court was originally established by the board of commissioners of Haywood County, on 3 December, 1924, under a general act, Laws *824 1919, ch. 277. … Roebuck v. Trustees, 184 N. C., 144 ; Coble v. Comrs., 184 N. C., 342 ; S. v. Kelly, 186 N. C., 365 ; Reed v. Engineering Co., 188 N. C., 39 ; Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N. C., 7 ; Ellis v. Greene, 191 N.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Epes Transport System, Incorporated

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 16, 1996

    Exhibit 8 Industrial Commission Form 22 Wage Chart, prepared by Epes Hauling, Inc., for Terry Brown, dated 2 April 1993. … Ex. 3 Functional Capacity Evaluation of Terry Brown performed by Jane Mantovani, dated 10 June 1993. * * * * * * * * * * * RULINGS ON EVIDENTIARY MATTERS The objections contained within the depositions of Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hampton v. . Board of Education

    195 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1928

    In July, 1926, when the board of county commissioners approved the budget, it adopted the foregoing resolution: "This board will not in anywise be responsible for any excess expense by the board of education beyond the said … amount for $423,350, and this board requests the board of education to give its assurance that it will comply with this request."

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.

    40 F. 849 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · Nov 15, 1889

    Garrett v. White, 8 Ired. Eq. 131 ; Ramsay v. Bell, Id. 209 ; McBryde v. Patterson, 73 N. C. 478 . … Kirk v. Hamilton, 102 U. S. 68 -79.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jones Ex Rel. Brown v. Gilreath

    28 N.C. 338 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1846

    Jones v. Blackledge, 2 No. Car. Law Rep. 457. For that reason, Brown’s note was not a set-off in this action. … But, if Brown had been the endorsee of this bond, and as such the plaintiff in this action, his promissary note to Gilreath, one of the defendants, would not be a set-off. State Bank v. Armstrong, 4 Dev. 519 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. North Carolina Department of Correction

    364 N.C. 319 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2010

    For the reasons stated in Jones v. Keller, — N.C.—, —, S.E.2d —(2010) (518PA09), we reverse the trial court’s 14 December 2009 order allowing petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. REVERSED.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Swain v. Tillett

    269 N.C. 46 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1967

    It means ‘to tend; to feed; to pasture; to board; to maintain; to supply with necessaries of life.’ ” Allen v. Ham, 63 Me. 532, 536 . … The applicable law was succinctly stated, and authorities collected, by Ervin, J., in Brown v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Nationsbank of North Carolina v. Brown

    340 N.C. 568 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 21, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Board of Commissioners

    183 N.C. 638 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1922

    Key v. Board of Education, 170 N. C., 123 ; Gill v. Comrs., 160 N. C., 176 . … Proctor v. Comrs., 182 N. C., 56 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Wilson Cty. Bd. of Educ. v. Ret. Sys. Div.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 2023

    COA22-1027 Filed 15 August 2023 Wilson County, No. 21 CVS 1471 WILSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Petitioner, v. … App. 325, 3 The Johnston County Board of Education, Wilkes County Board of Education, and Union County Board of Education also filed requests for declaratory rulings. See Johnston Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Farley industries/westpoint Pepperell

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 11, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Board of Commissioners

    190 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925

    In Brown v. Comrs., 173 N. … S. v. Kelly, 186 N. C., 365 , and cases there cited.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Crump v. Board of Education

    79 N.C. App. 372 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1986

    Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474 , 95 L.Ed. 456 , 71 S.Ct. 456 (1951); Underwood v. … School District v. Superior *375 Court, 102 Ariz. 478, 480 , 433 P. 2d 28, 30 (1967).” Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 31 N.C.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Moran v. Board of Commissioners

    168 N.C. 289 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1915

    Rigsbee v. Durham, 98 N. C., 81 ; Goldsboro Graded School v. Broadhurst, 109 N. C., 232 ; Rodman, v. Washington, 122 N. C., 39 ; Bear v. Comrs., 124 N. C., 204 ; Hollowell v. Borden, 148 N. C., 255 ; Ellis v. … This case is not like Winston v. Trust Co., 158 N. C., 512 , as is explained in Briggs-v. Raleigh, 166 N. C., 150 . Nor is it like McCrackin v. R.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.