Case law

Soucy v. Sullivan & Merritt

722 A.2d 361 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 6, 1999

See Seashore Performing Arts Ctr., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach, 676 A.2d 482, 485 (Me.1996). … See e.g., Wright v. Universal Maritime Serv.

Baker v. S.D. Warren Co.

3 A.3d 380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 26, 2010

. [¶ 11] We previously noted that the coordination of benefits statute was “silent on the treatment of lump sum amounts and the Board ha[d] not promulgated a rule to cover this statutory vacuum.” Foley v. … See, e.g., Lydon v.

Department of Mental Health & Corrections v. Bowman

308 A.2d 586 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 31, 1973

In State Board of Education v. … Carter v. Wilkins, 160 Me. 290 , 203 A.2d 682 (1964); State Board of Education v. Coombs, supra.

Barrett v. United States

763 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 30, 1991

Hunnewell v. United States, 738 F.Supp. 582 ; Tracey v. United States, 739 F.2d at 682. … Grace v. Butter-worth, 586 F.2d 878, 880 (1st Cir.1978). In Vega Pelegrina v.

State v. Powers

386 A.2d 721 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 18, 1978

Brown, a coastal warden for the Department of Marine Resources. … Seeing the encounter going against them, both Chief Gray and Warden Brown unhol-stered their revolvers to maintain the arrests.

State v. Freeman

487 A.2d 1175 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 12, 1985

See Brown, 570 P.2d at 59 , cited in Anton, 463 A.2d at 708 . … I, § 6; State v. Sklar, 317 A.2d 160, 165 (Me.1974); State v. Anton, 463 A.2d at 705 . Were it not a part of a larger statutory scheme, we might simply remand this case for a jury trial. See Brown v. Multnomah Co.

Hunter v. Randall

62 Me. 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

. & Ell., 94; Browne on Statute of Frauds, § 184; Hearn v. Waterhouse, 39 Maine, 96. This view of the case does not necessarily deprive the plaintiff of all remedy. … See Browne on Statute of Frauds, §§ 182, 183 ; Medbury v. Watson, 6 Metc., 246 ; Swann v. Phillips, 8 Ad. & Ell., 457 ; Lyde v. Barnard, Tyrw. & Gr., (Exch.) 250. Exceptions sustained. Appleton, O.

IBM Credit Corp. v. City of Bath

665 A.2d 663 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 21, 1995

Central Maine Power Co. v. Town of Moscow, 649 A.2d 320, 324 (Me.1994) (citations omitted). … Shawmut Inn v. Town of Kennebunkport, 428 A.2d 384, 389-90 (Me.1981).

Golder v. City of Saco

45 A.3d 697 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 12, 2012

Inc. v. Carter, 2011 ME 77, ¶6 , 25 A.3d 96 . … See Adelman v. Town of Baldwin, 2000 ME 91, ¶¶ 22-24 , 750 A.2d 577 (discussing the plaintiffs burden to prove inconsistency); Vella v.

Fryeburg Water Co. v. Town of Fryeburg

893 A.2d 618 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 2006

Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2000 ME 30, ¶ 6 , 746 A.2d 368, 371 (quotation marks omitted); see also Rowe v. City of S. Portland, 1999 ME 81, ¶ 4 , 730 A.2d 673, 674 ; Pearson v. … Timeliness [¶ 16] In Wright v.

Fort Fairfield Nash Co. v. Noltemier

135 Me. 84 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 27, 1937

.” *89 In Stewart v. Smith, supra, our Court accepted the law as enounced in Brown v. … Reason therefor was given in the following quotation from Brown v.

Estate of Robbins v. Town of Cumberland

154 A.3d 1183 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 2017

Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC v. Town of Kittery, 2004 ME 65, ¶ 10 , 856 A.2d 1183 . B. … Corp. v. Town of Washington, 2007 ME 31, ¶ 7 , 916 A.2d 973 . “[I]f the meaning of the ... ordinance is clear, we need not look beyond the words themselves.” Wister v. Town of Mt.

Ottinger v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

635 A.2d 948 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1993

One employee noted after the accident that the banana was medium brown in color. … Chasse v. Mazerolle, 622 A.2d 1180, 1182 (Me.1993).

Burgess v. Robinson

95 Me. 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 1901

Libby v. Mayberry, 80 Maine, 137; Ladd v. Dickey, 84 Maine, 190. … Andrews v. Senter, 32 Maine, 394; Ladd v. Dickey, 84 Maine, 190.

Graves v. Brockway-Smith Co.

55 A.3d 456 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 2012

Hanson v. S.D. *459 Warren Co., 2010 ME 51, ¶ 12 , 997 A.2d 730 . … See 39-A M.R.S. § 304; 7 Wilson, 2008 ME 47, ¶ 7, 942 A.2d 1237 ; Stickles v. United Parcel Serv., 554 A.2d 1176, 1179 (Me.1989). C. Wilson v.

Sanford Highway Unit of Local 481 v. Town of Sanford

411 A.2d 1010 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1980

See Rockwell v. Board of Education, 393 Mich. 616 , 227 N.W.2d 736, 746 (1975). … (emphasis in original) National Labor Relations Board v.

Maine School Administrative District No. 15 v. Raynolds

413 A.2d 523 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 16, 1980

Licensing Board, 157 Me. 411 , 173 A.2d 554 (1961); at length in City of Biddeford v. Biddeford Teachers Association, Me., 304 A.2d 387 (1973); and most recently in State v. Dube, Me., 409 A.2d 1102 (1979). … See Roussel v. State, Me., 274 A.2d 909, 926 (1971); Boutet v. Planning Board of City of Saco, Me., 253 A.2d 53, 56 (1969).

Sawyer v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

852 A.2d 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2004

DISCUSSION [¶ 10] The Planning Board’s interpretation of the open space zoning standards of the zoning ordinance is a question of law that we review de novo. Isis Dev., LLC v. … Town of Ogunquit, 1998 ME 42 , 709 A.2d 106 , and York v.

Farley v. Town of Lyman

557 A.2d 197 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1989

On appeal we review the record before the Board of Appeals directly because the Superior Court in affirming the Board acted as an intermediate appellate tribunal. See Your Home, Inc. v. … Anderson v. Gile, 78 A. 370, 371 , 107 Me. 325, 328 (1910). The Board of Appeals, the factfinder in this case, found her evidence neither satisfactory nor convincing.

Freeport Minerals Co. v. Inhabitants of Bucksport

437 A.2d 642 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 1981

Trust and Guaranty Co. v. Portsmouth, 59 N.H. 33, 34 (1879). … See Dead River Co. v. Assessors of Houlton, 149 Me. 349, 355 , 103 A.2d 123, 127 (1953); Perry v. Inhabitants of the Town of Lincolnville, 145 Me. 362, 365 , 75 A.2d 851, 852-53 (1950); cf. Lanford v.