Case law

Anderson v. Board of Com'rs of Pittsburg County

134 Okla. 299 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1928

of county commissioners of said county; that the same was by said board disallowed for the reason that the estimate made by the county commissioners and excise board for the payment of 'such mileage had become exhausted … Board of Com’rs of Craig County, 67 Okla. 141 , 169 Pac. 1101 .

Whittle v. State Board of Examiners of Psychologists

483 P.2d 328 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1971

Whetsel v. Wood, 207 Okl. 193 , 248 P.2d 612 , 34 A.L.R.2d 1321 (1952). … We feel that under the circumstances, the Board should have established some reasonable alternative procedure for allowing the applicant to demonstrate his competence. See Taylor v.

Brown v. Graham

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · May 17, 2021

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA KEVIN MAURICE BROWN, SR., ) … Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991).

Committee of Oil Refiners v. State Insurance Board

192 Okla. 92 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 19, 1943

Co. of Cincinnati v. State Insurance Board, 184 Okla. 66 , 84 P. 2d 614 , we set out and discussed the applicable statutes (36 O. … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, WELCH, DAVI-SON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. OSBORN, J., absent.

Excise Board of Le Flore County v. Lowden

173 Okla. 265 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1935

Bank of Poteau v. Board of Co. Com’rs, the other No. 8451, in the district court, Germo Mfg. Co. v. Board of Co. Com’rs of Le Flore County. … The question is decided in Board of Co. Com’rs of Blaine County v. Foster, 169 Okla. 384 , 37 P. (2d) 300 .

Paschall Properties, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

733 P.2d 878 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 20, 1987

Reading Mills, supra, in conjunction with White v. … King v. McCurdy, 171 Okl. 445 , 43 P.2d 124 (Okl.1935). The trial court erred in permanently enjoining the Board of County Commissioners of Delaware County from widening and maintaining said road.

Bancroft v. Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists

202 Okla. 108 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1949

Berlandi v. Reimer, D. C. N. Y., 30 F. Supp. 767, 768 , it was stated that issuing checks with intent to defraud was an offense involving moral turpitude. … The action of the Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists of Oklahoma in revoking the license of Dr. Levy Harry Bancroft is hereby affirmed. DAVISON, C.J., ARNOLD, V. C.

County Board of Equalization v. Frontier Grain Co.

454 P.2d 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1969

The Board relies on the rule stated in Mid-Continent Building Company v. … Co. v. Nichols, 196 Okl. 508 , 165 P.2d 982 ).

State Ex Rel. Williamson v. State Election Board

192 Okla. 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1943

He cites also Clark v. … In Roberts v.

Board of County Commisioners v. City of Muskogee

62 O.B.A.J. 3429 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1991

City of Hollis, 193 Okl. 241 , 142 P.2d 633, 640 (1943); Board of Education of City of Drumright v. Board of County Com’rs of Creek County, 171 Okl. 464 , 43 P.2d 139, 140 (1935); McMahan v. … . . 62 O.S.1981 §§ 431, 435; Board of Education v.

Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie County v. Grace

23 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1909

Barry v. Board of County Com'rs of Tulsa County

173 Okla. 645 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1935

The Supreme Court of Vermont, in Harris v. … And in Gilman v. Tucker, 128 N. Y. 190 , 28 N.

Vann v. Board of Ed., Town of Lenapah

102 Okla. 286 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1924

Dougal v. White, 89 Okla. 107 , 213 Okla. 868 ; Anderson v. Lynch, 98 Okla. 137 , 221 Pac. 415 .

Board of Com'rs of Atoka County v. Taylor

90 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1923

The board of county commissioners, plaintiff in error, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Upon the authority of Rice et al. v. … Swartz et al., No. 14090, in which an opinion this day has been filed, 90 Okla. 16 , 215 Pac. 605 , and the cases of Board of Com’rs of Craig County v. Germo Mfg. Co., 71 Oklahoma, 176 Pac. 902 , Sequoyah County v.

Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig County

67 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1917

Smartt, sheriff of Craig county, commenced this action against the board of county commissioners of Craig county to recover judgment on claims against said county to the amount of $282.-34 for the board of prisoners, etc. … In Shannon v.

Board of Com'rs of Craig County v. Smartt

75 Okla. 159 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1919

The question presented in this ease is identical with that presented in Smartt v. Board of County Commissioners (No. 7737) 67 Oklahoma, 169 Pac. 1101 , L. R. A. 1918C, 313.

Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. City of Lawton

580 P.2d 510 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1978

V. Field and A. Bradford, the Civil Code of New York— Field Code). … One of the cases footnoted, Broadbent v. Ramsbotham, 11 Exch. 602, 25 L.J.

County Election Board of Coal County v. Robinson

352 P.2d 920 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1960

He cites Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okl. 169 , 170 P.2d 200 ; and Love v. State Election Board (Patterson), 197 Okl. 165 , 170 P.2d *923 191 , in support of his contention. … The case of Stafford v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 132 , 218 P.2d 617 , is determinative of this issue. In that case Stafford tendered a filing for the Legislature for the 1950 Democratic Primary.

Holmes v. Board of Com'rs of Osage County

132 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1928

Adams v. Power, 87 Okla. 80 , 209 Pac. 395 .

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Shutler

139 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1929

But. in view of the holding of this court in State v. Blake, 139 Okla. 241 , 280 Pac. 833 , we are sure of the opinion that there is nothing now before this court for review. In State v. … However, from the holding in the case of State v.