Case law

McLaughlin v. Board of Review

7 N.J. Super. 12 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1950

This is an appeal from the decision of iho Board of Eeview of the Unemployment Compensation Commission. Claimant testified that he was a night club entertainer. … Thereupon, claimant appealed to the Board of Review, which affirmed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal. This appeal followed. R.

Scarpa v. Board of Review

4 N.J. Super. 336 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 1949

Plaintiff appealed this decision to the Board of Review, which affirmed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal on the record before such body and for the reasons given by it for its determination.

Smith v. Board of Education

35 N.J. Super. 82 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1955

Judson v. Peoples Bank and Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N. J. 67 (1954). … The appellants’ argument that the failure to make full disclosure to the public of all facts within the knowledge of the local board of education voids the referendum is based upon the ruling in Driscoll v.

State v. Board of Excise

46 N.J.L. 312 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1884

The question was raised in Dufford v. Hoagland, argued and decided with Dufford v. Nolan, supra. It was not necessary to decide it then, but it now requires decision. … In that capacity he had a standing before the board of excise, and was entitled to present there these precise objections, which the board were bound to hear and determine. Dufford v. Nolan, supra.

Board of Justices v. Fennimore

1 N.J.L. 220 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1793

The act of assembly (Allinson 115) makes the county commissioners accountable to the board. … See Nimmo’s Executor v. Commonwealth, 4 Hen. and Munf. 57.

Horner v. Board of Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 406 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1917

Johnson v. Van Horn, 45 N. J. L. 136; Poillon v. Rutherford, 58 Id. 113; Hohenstatt v. Bridgeton, 62 Id. 169. … Justice Dixon, in Robinson v. Hulick, 67 N. J. L. 496: “All persons interested, or about to become interested, in lands in New Jersey, are chargeable with notice of these laws and of their normal operation.

Barnert v. Board of Aldermen

69 N.J.L. 122 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1903

An ordinance for this purpose presented to the board in August, 1900, was defeated. … of aldermen, and, hence, the board cannot in deciding it be controlled by mandamus.

Niles v. Board of Education

70 N.J.L. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1903

thereon; provided, however, that said board of education, in purchasing said lands and erecting said school building, shall not make expenditures, or incur indebtedness, in excess of the amount realized from the sale of … It appears from the allegations of the declaration that the defendants, the board of education of the town of West New York, on the 31st day of May, 1899, by resolution adopted by *3 the votes of a majority of the members

Horn v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 801 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1928

Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 802 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1928

Under this writ we are asked to reverse the judgment of the board of adjustment of the city of East Orange, refusing to prosecutor a permit to erect an apartment house. Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. … R. 489, and Bellofatto et al. v. Montclair, Ibid. 512, are controlling and the judgment under review is affirmed and the writ dismissed, with costs.

Horton v. Board of Education

6 N.J. Misc. 963 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1928

Stat., p. 4805) the city scheme may be adopted by referendum in a town, township or borough, and will then be operative therein, as in fact was the situation in Kay v. Board, &c., of Kearny, 83 N. J. … L. 551, 553, and in Scola v. Board, &c., of Montclair, 77 Id. 73, 75. Both Kearny and Montclair were towns, and had adopted the city scheme.

Johnson v. Board of Commissioners

33 N.J. Eq. 621 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1881

Coffey v. Board of Commissioners

130 N.J.L. 582 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 21, 1943

This writ brings up for .review the “proceedings relating to a certain ordinance known as Ordinance No. 1 * * * adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Atlantic City and entitled £An ordinance fixing the salary … The ordinance, adopted at a Board meeting on January 21st, 1943, fixes the salary of the Registrar of Vital Statistics of Atlantic City at $1,960 per year, payable in semi-monthly installments.

Buchholtz v. Board of Adjustment

7 N.J. Misc. 512 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1929

The prosecutors file four reasons for setting aside the order or judgment of the board of adjustment. First. … The result we have reached is the order or judgment of the board of adjustment is affirmed and the writ of certiorari is- dismissed, with costs.

Gerber v. Board of Review

19 N.J. 441 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 31, 1955

Ferraro v. Board of Managers

8 N.J. Misc. 625 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 2, 1930

minutes of the board relating to John 0. … Lindsley, relator, v. Board of Managers of the New Jersey State Prison, respondent, decided at this term of court, were argued on the samé briefs.

State v. Board of Excise Commissioners

56 N.J.L. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1894

Section '9 of the ordinances of the excise board forbids the granting of a license in such case. In Leigh v. … Nolan, 17 Vroom 87 ; Austin v. Atlantic City, 19 Id. 118 . Persons opposed to this license had a right to suppose that the board would hear it in the orderly way, according to its. own rules.

Linbarger v. Board of Education

83 N.J.L. 446 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1912

Montrale v. People's Bank, 45 Vroom 464 . The sixteenth section of that act (Comp. … The case of Montvale v. People’s Bank, supra, therefore, controls that now under consideration, so far as the question of- delivery is concerned, and the judgment under review must be affirmed.

Baylinson v. Board of Commissioners

282 N.J. Super. 132 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1995

Vail v. Pan American Corp., 260 N.J.Super. 292, 297 , 616 A.2d 523 (App.Div.1992). … English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 89 , 110 S.Ct. 2270, 2280 , 110 L.Ed.2d 65 (1990); Miller v. Northwest Airlines, 253 N.J.Super. 618 , 602 A.2d 785 (App.Div.1992).

Schragger v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

58 N.J. 274 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1971

See Bergen County Sewer Authority v. Little Ferry, 5 N. J. 548, 552 (1950); Ross v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 69 N. J. L. 291 (E. & A. 1903); New Jersey Zinc Co. v. … Sussex County Board of Equalization of *279 Taxes, 70 N. J. L. 186 (Sup. Ct. 1903); State v. Wildwood, 83 N. J. L. 188 (Sup. Ct. 1912); Murray v. Murray, 7 N. J. Super. 549 (Law Div. 1950).