Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • North v. District of Columbia Board of Education

    471 F. Supp. 136 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1979

    . § 1412 (5)(B); Miils v. Board of Education, supra, 348 F.Supp. at 880 ; Stuart v. Nappi, 443 F.Supp. 1235, 1242 (D.Conn.1978). 5 . For a recent Instance where the D.C. … See, e. g., 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (b)(1)(C); 45 C.F.R. 121a.505; 45 C.F.R. 121a.347; 45 C.F.R. 84.36; Mills v. Board of Education, supra, 348 F.Supp. at 880 .

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Cintas Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    482 F.3d 463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

    Id; see Adtranz ADB Daimler- *466 Benz Transp. v. … Cal. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Manufacturers Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

    676 F.3d 1094 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2012

    When service over a line has been discontinued, the Board retains jurisdiction over that line. See New York Cross Harbor Railroad v. STB, 374 F.3d 1177, 1182 n.5 (D.C. … Cir. 2004); National Ass’n of Reversionary Property Owners v. STB, 158 F.3d 135, 137 n.1 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (citing Preseault v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

    366 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 1973

    Board of Parole. … Parole Board. See D.C.Code § 24-209.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

    870 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1989

    Whatever deference is owed to the Board under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. … See, e.g., United States v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Baker DC, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    102 F. Supp. 3d 194 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 2015

    Petroleum Inst. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Patterson v. D. C. Board of Parole

    551 F.2d 467 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 1977

    551 F.2d 467 179 U.S.App.D.C. 281 Patterson v. D. C. Board of Parole No. 74-1920 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 3/29/77 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED *

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    678 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 18, 1987

    By Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed January 13, 1987, this Court granted the motion of plaintiffs which challenged the Bank Board’s classification of assets regulations. Haralson v. … United States v. Aarons, 310 F.2d 341, 348 (2d Cir.1962).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Schiffmann v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    302 A.2d 235 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1973

    V, 1972), the Board made findings of fact from which it was concluded that the applicant met the requirements of the Act, D.C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a)6 (Supp. … The contention that the Board failed to make the finding required by D. C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a)6 (Supp. V, 1972), is clearly without merit.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board

    112 F. Supp. 346 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1953

    In Federal Communications Commission v. … The doctrine of Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, supra, is not applicable to proceedings under the Administrative Procedure Act.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    305 A.2d 516 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 16, 1973

    Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 68 App.D.C. 282, 287 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 (1938), as specifically applied to decisions of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, Robey v. Schwab, 113 U.S. … In sum, the applicant must make the requisite showing, and once he has, the Board ordinarily must grant his application. Robey v. Schwab, supra 307 F.2d at 201; Hyman v. Coe, 146 F.Supp. 24, 27, 32 (D.D.C.1956).

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Barnes v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

    759 A.2d 1073 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2000

    Smith v. Quick, 680 A.2d 396, 398 (D.C.1996) (citing Bennett, 633 A.2d at 826 ); accord, Brown-Bey v. Hyman, 649 A.2d 8, 9 (D.C.1994); In re Tate, 63 F.Supp. 961, 962 (D.D.C.) … of innocence”); United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chiron Corp. v. National Transportation Safety Board

    198 F.3d 935 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 21, 1999

    Thomas Brooks v. Burnett, 920 F.2d 634, 639 (10th Cir. 1990); accord Jetcraft Corp. v. Flight Safety Int'l, 16 F.3d 362, 366 (10th Cir. 1993). … See Morton v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2023

    See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 759 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (communications privileged where a primary purpose was for legal advice); United States v. Deloitte LLP, 610 F.3d 129, 138 (D.C. … Glenn v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    259 F.2d 808 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1958

    Civil Aeronautics Board, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 184 , 243 F.2d 607 (1957) ; United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 42 , . United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, supra note 1. . … North American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 55 , 237 F.2d 209 (D.C.Cir.1956).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Eugene R. Brown v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.

    523 F.2d 725 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1975

    Transit terminated the service of appellee Brown on September 22, 1971, and of appellee Gray on October 7, 1971. 4 . See Fagan v. National Cash Register Co., 157 U.S.App.D.C. 15 , 481 F.2d 1115 (1973); cf. Dodge v. … L.Ed.2d 736 (1972), where he wrote in part It seems incredible that under our federalism a State can deny a student education in' its public school system unless his hair style comports with the standards of the school board

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mental Health & Mental Hygiene

    373 F. App'x 77 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 2010

    See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abadie v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

    916 A.2d 913 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2007

    The Contract Appeals Board sustained the protest on one of the added grounds, rejecting the argument that it was untimely, and the Superior Court upheld the Board. … Mgt. of Md., Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 877 A.2d 96, 105-06 (D.C.2005); Bio-Medical Applications of the District of Columbia v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • SW General, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    796 F.3d 67 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 7, 2015

    We similarly express no view on defenses the Board never raised. See United States v. … The NLRB General Counsel is statutorily independent from the Board, see NLRB v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board Union & National Labor Relations Board Professional Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

    313 F. App'x 328 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.