Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

6.10s

  • Francey v. Board of Educ.

    286 N.J. Super. 354 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1996

    Board of Educ. of Manchester, Ocean County v. Raubinger, 78 N.J. … See Mirandi v. Board of Educ. of West Orange, 1989 S.L.D. 3057, 3062; Bodine v. Board of Educ. of Burlington, Burlington County, 1989 S.L.D. 1053, 1058, aff'd by State Bd. of Educ., 1989 S.L.D. 1064.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mahnken v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    62 N.J.L. 404 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1898

    Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Righter, 13 Vroom 180 ; Central Railroad Co. v. Moore, 4 Zab. 824; Durant v. Palmer, 5 Dutcher 544; Houston v. Traphagen, 18 Vroom 23 ; Comben v. Belleville Stone Co., 30 Id. 226 ; Whart. … In Durant v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Walsh v. Board of Education

    73 N.J.L. 643 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1906

    In Mabon v. … In Browning v. Camden and Woodbury Railroad Co., 3 Gr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kraft v. Board of Education

    67 N.J.L. 512 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1902

    Green v. Cape May , 12 Id. 45; State v. Jersey City, 3 Dutcher 493; Burlington v. Dennison, supra; Foster v. Cape May, supra. … Cape May, &c., Railroad Co. v. *515 Cape May , 8 Stew. Eq. 419; Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 29 Vroom 262 ; Oakley v. Atlantic City, 34 Id. 127; Ryan v. City of Paterson, 37 Id. 533; 2 Dill. Mun.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Scott v. Board of Education

    219 F.R.D. 333 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 6, 2004

    Grossman v. Schwarz, 125 F.R.D. 376, 381 (S.D.N.Y.1989) (citing Kelly v. San Jose, 114 F.R.D. 653, 658-59 (N.D.Cal.1987)). See also Soto v. … (citing United States v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Local Board of Health v. Eastlack

    68 N.J.L. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

    No nuisance existed on the premises until a case of small-pox broke out in a member of the tenant's family, whose excretions were emptied into the cesspool,'by the direction of the defendant board of health, who also had … The board of health was entirely without power to abrogate this legal rule by authorizing the prosecutor to come and clean out the closet. The judgment is set aside, with costs.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jaclyn Thompson v. Board of Trustees, Teachers'

    449 N.J. Super. 478 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 2017

    Patterson, supra, 194 N.J. at 45-47 (quoting Brunell v. … See Turner v. Comm'r of Soc.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Galbraith v. Board of Education

    152 N.J. 185 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 31, 1997

    Certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the State Board of Education for reconsideration after the parties have been afforded the opportunity to supplement the record in respect of the “reasonableness

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State

    159 N.J. 565 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 1999

    Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State, 311 N.J.Super. 637, 642-43 , 710 A.2d 1060 (Law Div.1997). … Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State, 311 N.J.Super. 587, 589 , 710 A.2d 1035 (App.Div.1998). The panel also focused on the phrase “certain judicial costs.” See ibid.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Urban v. Planning Board

    121 N.J. 664 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 30, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dornbusch v. Board of Adjustment

    13 N.J. Misc. 779 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 11, 1935

    The board of adjustment revoked a permit duly issued by the superintendent of buildings of the city of Newark for an automobile laundry at 793 Sanford avenue. … After the superintendent of buildings issued the permit for the laundry, the work was substantially completed before an appeal was taken to the board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Banta v. Board of Trustees

    39 N.J. Eq. 123 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1884

    Nichols v. Disner, 5 Dutch. 293. The issuing of the execution after Maria Berry’s death without revivor was, at most, merely erroneous. Howard v. Pitt, 1 Salk. 261; Day v. Sharp, 4. Whart. 339; Hughes v. … McCa hill v. Equitable Life Ins. Soc., 11 C. E. Gr. 531; Shultz v. Sanders, 11 Stew. Eq. 154. In this case there was a formal order that the alias execution issue.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. BOARD OF EDUC.

    246 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 19, 1991

    We have no difficulty deferring, as we must, to that sensible interpretation of the encompassing language of the State Board's own regulation. See Metromedia, Inc. v. … Bd. of Educ., et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Muller v. Board of Trustees

    316 N.J. Super. 94 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 10, 1998

    In Gable v. … We also reject the Board’s attempt to analogize this case to Mazza v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Castellano v. Linden Board of Education

    79 N.J. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1979

    the Board and the Linden Educational Association. 3 Eailure on the Board’s part to abide by the terms of such agreement could have subjected the Board to a claim of an unfair labor practice. … argues that the affirmance by the Appellate Division of the finding of sex discrimination herein is contrary to the decision by another panel of the Appellate Division in Gilchrist v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Borromeo v. Board of Review

    196 N.J. Super. 576 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1984

    This is the holding of Battaglia v. Board of Review, 14 N.J.Super. 24 (App.Div.1951), and Caldwell v. Div. of Unemployment Dis. Ins., 145 N.J.Super. 206 (App.Div.1976). … The Board of Review found that claimant was “fully employed” because he was working between 30 and 40 hours each week.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cumberland County Welfare Board v. Jordan

    81 N.J. Super. 406 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1963

    Compare McLaughlin v. New Jersey Civil Service Commission, 137 N. J. L. 338 (Sup. Ct. 1948), affirmed 1 N. … Campbell v. Department of Civil Service, 39 N. J. 556 (1963). We find no sound basis in law or in fact for disturbing the conclusion reached by the Civil Service Commission. The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Minner v. Board of Trustees

    99 N.J. 199 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mortimer v. Board of Review

    99 N.J. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1984

    Certification to the Board of Review granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Read v. Board of Commissioners

    4 N.J. Misc. 203 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1926

    The Road act of 1917 was construed in Gillen v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 91 N. J. … Salem, &c., Co. v. State Board, &c., supra. See, also, Johnson v. Asbury, 58 N. J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.