Case law

Gill v. Board of Commissioners

160 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1912

By the statute, the boards were not authorized to act at all until a properly signed petition had been filed. R. R. v. … A., Ill, in wbicb it is also beld tbat “citizens,” witb reference to tbe right of suffrage, means male persons: Brown v. U. S., 113 U. S., 568 ; Sedgewick on Stat. and Const. Law, 225.

Brown v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Instruction

813 S.E.2d 238 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 2018

Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.

323 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1988

Brown v. Hearthside Home Care, LLC

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 20, 2003

Brown v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Safety

811 S.E.2d 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2018

Brown v. N.C. Department of Corrections

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 17, 2002

Branch v. Board of Education

230 N.C. 505 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1949

At the hearing the several boards and agencies were represented and proceeded with evidence. … Grantham v. Nunn, 188 N.C. 239 , 124 S.E. 309 ; Owen v. Board of Education, 184 N.C. 267 , 114 S.E. 390 ; Sutton v. Sutton, 183 N.C. 128 , 110 S.E. 777 .

Harris v. Board of Commissioners

274 N.C. 343 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1968

The second sentence in Article IX, Sec. 2, enclosed by parentheses, following the decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 98 L. ed. 873, 74 S. … Mecklenburg County, 205 N.C. 560 , 172 S.E. 323 ; Taylor v. Board of Education, 206 N.C. 263 , 173 S.E. 608 . In Julian v.

Mears v. . Board of Education

214 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 22, 1938

Wilkinson v. Board of Education, 199 N. C., 669 , 155 S. E., 562 . … Ch. 394, Acts 1937; Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 178 N. C., *92 305, 100 S. E., 698 ; Cody v. Barrett, supra.

Brown v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Instruction

813 S.E.2d 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 2018

Terry v. Brown Moulding Co., Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 21, 2001

On 31 October 1997, plaintiff worked as a truck driver for Defendant Brown Moulding Company, Inc., when he was involved in a motor vehicle accident involving four vehicles.

Brown v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Safety

807 S.E.2d 566 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 7, 2017

Brown v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Instruction

812 S.E.2d 851 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 9, 2018

Threadgill v. Board of Commissioners

99 N.C. 352 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

It assumes the obligation to keep it in a cleanly manner to rest upon the board by virtue of vesting of the title to the premises in the board as a trustee for the public. The Code, § 707; sub secs. 5, 7, 8. … It is nowhere charged that the board has failed to use the means at their disposal to prevent such consequences, and this is the measure and extent of official responsibility. In State v. Fishblate, 83 N.

Umstead v. . Board of Elections

192 N.C. 139 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1926

Britt v. Board of Canvassers , 172 N.C. 797 . … Johnson v. Board of Elections , 172 N.C. 162 . This principle is so well settled that citation of authorities does not seem necessary. Lenoir County v. Taylor , 190 N.C. 336 ; Person v. Doughton , 186 N.C. 723 .

Brown v. J. S. Scofields Sons Co.

174 N.C. 4 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1917

Warwick v. Ginning Co., 153 N. C., 262 ; House v. R. R., 152 N. C., 397 ; Hicks v. Mfg. Co., 138 N. C., 319 .” In Mining Co. v. … Frazer v. Lumber Co., 45 Minn., 235 ; McGinty v. Reservoir, 155 Mass., 183 ; Coal Co. v. Schelles, 42 Ill. App., 619 .

Moore v. . Board of Education

212 N.C. 499 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1937

Newton v. School Comm., 158 N. C., 187 , 73 S. E., 886 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 570 , 112 S. E., 246 ; School Comm. v. Board of Education, 186 N. C., 643 , 120 S. E., 202 ; McInnish v. … Board of Education, 187 N. C., 494 , 122 S. E., 182 ; Board of Education v. Forrest, 190 N. C., 753 , 130 S. E., 621 ; Clark v. McQueen, 195 N. C., 714 , 143 S. E., 528 ; Crabtree v. Board of Education, 199 N.

Hicks v. Board of Education

183 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1922

Cecil v. High Point, 165 N. C., 431 ; Mfg. Co. v. Andrews, 165 N. C., 285. “Separate sections of the Code should be so construed, if possible, ás to reconcile them and effectuate each.” Propst v. R. R., 139 N. C., 397 . … The case of Riddle v. Cumberland County, 180 N. C., 321 , was cited to us as bearing some resemblance to this case, and Perry v.

Beaufort County Board of Education v. Beaufort County Board of Commissioners

188 N.C. App. 399 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2008

State of North Carolina, et al., 346 N.C. 336 , 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997) ‘Leandro I’, and Hoke County Board of Education, et al. v. State of North Carolina, et al., 358 N.C. 605 , 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004), ‘Leandro II.’ … V.

Board of Education v. . Pegram

197 N.C. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1929

Apparently, the power to condemn was first bestowed upon county boards of education by section 31, chapter 4, Public Laws 1901. … One phase of the question now presented, was considered by this Court in Board of Education v. Forrest, 190 N. C., 753 , 130 S. E., 621 .