Case law

Childs v. United States Board of Parole

511 F.2d 1270 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 1974

Reference to that decision in United States Board of Parole v. … As we have seen the following decisions have required reasons to be stated: Fischer v. Cahill; Monks v. New Jersey State Parole Board; King v.

Press Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

118 F.2d 937 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1941

Labor Board, 7 Cir., 102 F.2d 949, 956 ; Labor Board v. Sunshine Mining Co., 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 780, 786 ; Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Labor Board, 7 Cir., 107 F.2d 555, 559 ; Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. … Labor Board, 5 Cir., 113 F.2d 85, 92 ; Continental Box Co. v. Labor Board, 5 Cir., 113 F.2d 93, 96, 97 ; Midland Steel Products Co. v. Labor Board, 6 Cir., 113 F.2d 800, 804 ; Martel Mills Corporation v.

American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

365 F.2d 939 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1966

365 F.2d 939 AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. … was to be left to the Board; and second, that this court's decision in American Airlines, Inc., et al. v.

Khaksari v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors

689 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2010

Plaintiff Batool Khaksari (“Khaksari” or plaintiff) has sued the Chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (“BBG”) alleging a hostile work environment and discriminatory non-selection in violation of Title VII of the … Zhengxing v. Nathanson, 215 F.Supp.2d 114, 116-17 (D.D.C.2002) (noting that Title VII applies to employees but not independent contractors); Sherwood v.

State Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

174 F.2d 510 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1949

In Braniff Airways, Inc. v. … On the contrary we regard ourselves bound in this respect by the decision of the Supreme Court in Federal Communications Commission v.

Jackson Hospital Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2011

Spencer v. Practical Nurses' Examining Board

217 A.2d 602 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1966

On June 1, 1965, petitioner moved to reopen the proceedings before the Board. 2 This motion was rejected by the Board on June 22, 1965, on the grounds that (1) it was not timely filed; (2) it did not show good cause; and … Diatz v. Washington Technical School, D.C.Mun.App., 73 A.2d 227 (1950).

Shelton v. United States Board of Parole

388 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 1967

Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, No. 20591, infra. 2. … Smith v. Rivers, No. 20685, infra. 12 *575 Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion. No. 20,685 Smith v. Rivers No. 20,686 White v. United States Board of Parole No. 20,687 Jacobs v.

Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

255 F. Supp. 466 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 1966

Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 . This conclusion, however, is not unlimited. … The validity of the type of ballot used by the National Mediation Board was sustained by the Supreme Court in Brotherhood of Railway and S. S. Clerks etc. v.

Benjamin Rose Institute v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

338 A.2d 104 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 14, 1975

In reviewing this appeal it was discovered that a transcript of the District of Columbia proceeding had not been certified by the Board as part of the record on appeal and it was necessary to request the Board to supplement … We trust that this problem will not recur and that in the future the Board will certify the complete record of the administrative proceedings on appeal. 5 .D.O.Oode 1973, § 46-316(c) states: The Board shall participate in

Chappelle v. Board of Commissioners of Dist. of Col.

110 A.2d 697 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1955

Udebiuwa v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

818 A.2d 160 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 2003

We affirm the Board’s order. The post-trial settlement of the malpractice action mooted the litigation. For that reason the settlement required the dismissal of the pending appeal. See Milar Elevator Co. v. … Nursing Home v.

Schlosberg v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

167 F.2d 881 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 21, 1948

V, § 46 — 303(c) (7), 57 Stat. 107 , § 3(c) (7). … The court affirmed the Board’s finding as supported by substantial evidence. D.C.Code (1940), Supp. V, § 46 — 303(c) (10). We agree. Appellants had the burden of proving that they made a timely request.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

926 A.2d 140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2007

According to this provision, the Review Board “may not consider the evidence de novo and make factual findings different from those of the examiner.” Marriott Int’l v. … What the Board could not do was issue an award of compensation.

Standard Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

177 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1949

Esquire, Inc., 1946, 327 U.S. 146, 156 , 66 S.Ct. 456 , 90 L.Ed. 586 . 6 See Federal Communications Comm. v. … Wilson, Inc., v. Federal Communications Comm., 1948, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 176 , 170 F.2d 793 ; WJR, The Goodwill Station, Inc., v. Federal Communications Comm., 84 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 174 F.2d 226 (1948).

Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

999 A.2d 89 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2010

V. … The Board's brief refers to the "more than 200 District rights and responsibilities of civil marriage.” . See Estenos v. PAHO/WHO-Fed.

Creditors Committee of Horton Brown Corp. v. Goodhart

233 F.2d 23 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1956

Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

293 A.2d 470 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 1972

See Brewington v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 532, 534 (1972), and cases cited therein. … [Joseph v. F.C.C., 131 U.S.App.D.C. 207 , 211, 404 F.2d 207 , 211 (1968).] See also National Geographic Society v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 313, 317 , 438 F.2d 154, 158 (1970); 2 F.

Anthony M. Rossi v. Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense

642 F.2d 553 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1980

Rossi v. Brown, 467 F.Supp. 960, 965 (D.D.C.1979). … See Rossi v. Brown, 467 F.Supp. 960, 967 (D.D.C. 1979). 35 .

Meco Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

986 F.2d 1434 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 9, 1993

Corp. v. … See NLRB v.