Case law

D'Elena v. Burlington County Board

203 N.J. Super. 109 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 25, 1985

Under Citizens for Better Ed. v. … Josefowicz v. Porter, 32 N.J.Super. 585, 591 (App.Div.1954). Second, a citizen must show “a lawful, proper and legitimate purpose not adverse to the public interest.” Accident Index Bureau, Inc. v.

National Hat-Pouncing Mach. Co. v. Brown

36 F. 317 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · Sep 25, 1888

Brown never made any such machine. … If not, was it anticipated by Brown? If not, has it been infringed by the defendants? (1) Was it anticipated by the second claim of the Eicke-meyer patent?

Lang v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

160 N.J. 41 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 19, 1999

See Brandon v. … In Ward v.

Gherardi v. Trenton Board of Education

53 N.J. Super. 349 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 1958

GHERARDI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 15, 1958. … Connolloy v. Board of Education of Trenton, 5 N.J. Misc. 39 ( Sup. Ct. 1926). Accordingly, plaintiff is now precluded from an action for damages on account of the delays. A. Kaplen & Son, Ltd. v.

United Board & Carton Corp. v. Britting

61 N.J. Super. 340 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 1960

Super. 340 (1960) 160 A.2d 660 UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM J. BRITTING, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. … Jur., Equity, § 473, p. 327; Medical Fabrics Co. v. D.C. McLintock Co., 12 N.J. Super. 177, 181 ( App. Div. 1951); Casini v. Lupone, 8 N.J. Super. 362 ( Ch. Div. 1950); Tami v. Pikowitz, 138 N.J.

Hallman v. State Parole Board

46 N.J. 279 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1966

In this proceeding Hallman attacked the order of the State Parole Board revoking his parole and recommitting him to prison.

Board of Education v. Murnick

111 N.J. 625 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1988

Schulz v. State Board of Education

132 N.J.L. 345 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 4, 1945

The action of the board was the merest subterfuge to defeat the legislative purpose * * *.” Downs v. Board of Education of Hoboken, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 853 (1935). … Board of Education of Jersey City v. Wall, 119 N. J. L. 308 (1938).

Francey v. Board of Educ.

286 N.J. Super. 354 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1996

Board of Educ. of Manchester, Ocean County v. Raubinger, 78 N.J. … See Mirandi v. Board of Educ. of West Orange, 1989 S.L.D. 3057, 3062; Bodine v. Board of Educ. of Burlington, Burlington County, 1989 S.L.D. 1053, 1058, aff'd by State Bd. of Educ., 1989 S.L.D. 1064.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser

75 N.J.L. 9 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1908

Virtue v. Freeholders of Essex, 38 Vroom 139 . … This court had occasion, in the case of Watkins v.

Sabol v. Board of Education

510 F. Supp. 892 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 27, 1981

Reynolds Metals Co., Inc., supra, which relies on Caulfield v. Board of Education, 486 F.Supp. 862 (E.D.N.Y.1980); and United States v. … The Simpson Court relied on the decisions in United States v. Jefferson County Board of Ed., supra, and Caulfield v. Board of Education, supra, both Title VI actions.

McCully v. Board of Education

63 N.J.L. 18 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1899

Rader v. Township of Union, 10 Vroom 509 ; Little v. Township of Union, 11 Id. 397; Township of Union v. Rader , 12 Id. 617 ; Same v. Same, 16 Id. 182; Neilson v. Newark, 20 Id. 246. … remedy against the old board.

Freeman v. Board of Registry

76 N.J.L. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 30, 1907

In defence of the board it is said that it is now impossible-for them to make such a statement as the law requires. … Over sixty had Freeman’s name written in the same handwriting, and the case is stronger in that respect than Hackett v.

Fiscor v. Atlantic County Board

293 N.J. Super. 19 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 19, 1996

Fiscor, for claims that arose out of an accident that occurred while plaintiff was driving a vehicle owned by defendant Atlantic County Board of Chosen Freeholders. … Co. v.

Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.

65 N.J. 555 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 8, 1974

Silverman v. Board of Education

136 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 1975

Nelson v. BOARD OF EDUC.

246 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 19, 1991

We have no difficulty deferring, as we must, to that sensible interpretation of the encompassing language of the State Board's own regulation. See Metromedia, Inc. v. … Bd. of Educ., et al. v.

Smith v. Board of Commissioners

5 N.J. Misc. 390 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1927

The cases of Armitage v. Newark, 86 N. J. L. 5; Tice v. Long Branch, 98 Id. 214, are not in point on the facts. Our research has revealed no case in which this point has been directly considered. *391 Second. … The cases of McCarty v. Boulevard Commissioners, 91 N. J. L. 142; affirmed, 92 Id. 519; Atlantic Gas, &c., Co. v. Atlantic City, 73 Id. 360, should be applied.

Gish v. Board of Education

74 N.J. 251 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1977

Borromeo v. Board of Review

196 N.J. Super. 576 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1984

This is the holding of Battaglia v. Board of Review, 14 N.J.Super. 24 (App.Div.1951), and Caldwell v. Div. of Unemployment Dis. Ins., 145 N.J.Super. 206 (App.Div.1976). … The Board of Review found that claimant was “fully employed” because he was working between 30 and 40 hours each week.