Case law

D'Alessandro v. Town of Harpswell

48 A.3d 786 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 10, 2012

Chase v. Eastman, 563 A.2d 1099 , 1101-02 n. 2 (Me.1989). Likewise, in Alexander v. … Thus, although we review the Board’s factual findings under a deferential standard of review, see Bizier, 2011 ME 116, ¶ 8 , 32 A.3d 1048 ; Rudolph v.

Weeks v. Allen & Coles Moving Systems

704 A.2d 320 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 21, 1997

Wood v. Cives Constr. Corp., 438 A.2d 905, 908 (Me.1981). … Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 639 A.2d 626, 628 (1994).

McCullough v. Town of Sanford

687 A.2d 629 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1996

Wesson v. Town of Bremen, 667 A.2d 596, 598 (Me.1995). At the outset of the hearing in this case, the Chairman of the Board stated to Mr. … Recently, in Weekley v. Town of Scarborough, we held that a Board of Assessment Review erred in not granting the taxpayers’ request for an abatement.

Mary E. Campbell v. City of South Portland

123 A.3d 994 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 10, 2015

Because we will not substitute our judgment for the Board’s, Campbell’s challenge to those findings is not persuasive, see Toomey v. … Fitanides v. City of Saco, 2015 ME 32, ¶ 8, 113 A.3d 1088. Here, the parties agree that the operative decision is the Board’s.

Bushey v. Town of China

645 A.2d 615 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1994

See City of Auburn v. Desgrosseilliers, 578 A.2d 712, 714 (Me.1990). We now turn to the Busheys’ challenge to the board’s factual findings. … We will not overturn the factual findings of a board unless they are unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. Sanford Properties v. Town of Sanford, 609 A.2d 287, 288 (Me.1992); Gulick v. Board of Envtl.

Dumond v. Aroostook Van Lines

670 A.2d 939 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 1996

Id. at 1009-10 ; Poitras v. *942 RE. … Delorge v. NKL Tanning, Inc., 578 A.2d 1173, 1174 (Me.1990); Bean v. H.E. Sargent Inc., 541 A.2d 944, 946 (Me.1988); Campbell v.

Sara J.T. Behr v. Maine Public Employees Retirement System

142 A.3d 581 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 14, 2016

On appeal, Behr only challenges the denial of benefits as to her fibromyalgia. [¶3] We review directly the Board’s decision. Kelley v. Me. Pub. Emps. Ret. Sys., 2009 ME 27, ¶ 16, 967 A.2d 676. … Because the medical board’s reports are a proper part of the evidentiary record, the record does not compel a contrary finding. See Anderson v. Me. Pub. Emps. Ret.

Melgar v. Barr

379 F. Supp. 3d 783 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 2, 2019

Ct. 2480 , 2489, 192 L.Ed.2d 483 (2015) (quoting F.D.A. v. Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 529 U.S. 120 , 133, 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) ). … See, e.g. , Ramirez v. Brown , 852 F.3d 954 , 960 (9th Cir. 2017) ("Under the immigration laws, an alien who has obtained lawful status as a nonimmigrant has necessarily been "admitted."); Flores v. U.S.

Standard Oil Co. of New York v. Standard Oil Co. of Maine, Inc.

38 F.2d 677 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 10, 1930

C.) 17 F.(2d) 196, 199 ; Lynn Shoe Co. v. Auburn-Lynn Shoe Co., 100 Me. 461 , 62 A. 499 , 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 960; Globe-Wernicke Co. v. Brown (C. C.) 121 F. 185 ; Richmond Remedies Co. v. Dr. Miles Medical Co. (C. C. … There has been neither organization by the stockholders nor the election or creation of a board of directors, nor has there been an election of officers, and, further, there has been no attempt in any manner to transact business

Bureau of Employee Relations v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 93

614 A.2d 74 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 10, 1992

Our prior decisions make the Board’s analysis of doubtful validity. See, e.g., Maine School Admin. Dist. No. 61 Bd. of Directors v. Lake Region Teachers Ass’n, 567 A.2d 77 (Me.1989); Washburn v. … State, 432 A.2d 1237 (Me.1981); Board of Directors of Maine School Admin. Dist. No. 36 v. Maine School Admin. Dist.

Oliver v. City of Rockland

710 A.2d 905 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 30, 1998

Berry v. Maine State Retirement Sys. Bd. of Trustees, 663 A.2d 14, 18-19 (Me.1995). … Ballard, Builder, Inc. v. City of Westbrook, 502 A.2d 476, 480 (Me.1985).

Thiboutot v. State

405 A.2d 230 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 31, 1979

E. g., Brown v. Pitchess, 13 Cal.3d 518 , 119 Cal.Rptr. 204 , 531 P.2d 772 (1975); Terry v. Kolski, 78 Wis.2d 475 , 254 N.W.2d 704 (1977). Contra, Chamberlain v. Brown, 223 Tenn. 25 , 442 S.W.2d 248 (1969). … Tobeluk v. Lind, Alaska, 589 P.2d 873 (1979) (upholding a discretionary denial of fees under § 1988); Board of Trustees v.

Waste Disposal Inc. v. Town of Porter

563 A.2d 779 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 11, 1989

Maine Isle Corp. v. Town of St. George, 499 A.2d 149, 152 (Me.1985); Littlefield v. Inhabitants of Town of Lyman, 447 A.2d 1231, 1235 (Me.1982). … Portland v. Fisherman’s Wharf Assocs., 541 A.2d 160, 164 (Me.1988); Thomas v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of Bangor, 381 A.2d 643, 646-47 (Me.1978).

Town of Eddington v. Emera Maine

2017 ME 225 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 7, 2017

Green v. … East Livermore v.

Harden v. Gordon

11 F. Cas. 480 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Oct 15, 1823

What those prohibitions are, we have all learned from .the reports; and one can scarcely read the case of Howe v. Nappier (4 Burrows, 1944; and see, also, Buggin v. … Shipp, p. 2, c. 4, § 14; 2 Brown, Adm. 182 -184.

In Re Will of Edwards

161 Me. 141 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 1965

Brown in equal shares.” The precise details of the remainder are of no moment. The testatrix in the November 1952 codicil, gave the homestead to Beatrice V. … In May 1954, by her codicil the testatrix gave her Packard automobile to Beatrice V. Brown, her Plymouth automobile to Olive Hannaford, and “wearing apparel and paintings” in four boxes to “Doris M. Frost, Marion H.

Ingerson v. State

491 A.2d 1176 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 1, 1985

In State v. … V.

Manson v. Gardiner

5 Me. 108 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1827

It is true, as the court observe in the case of Brown & al. v. Anderson & al. 13. … We have before cited the case of Dawes v. Shed to shew that such a promise could not avoid the special statute of limitations, and again bind the estate; and to the same point we again cite the case of Brown v.

Friends of Mere Point v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 21, 2006

See Kroeger v. Maine Department of Environmental Protection, 2005 ME 50, 9 16, 870 A.2d 566, 571, Isis Development, LLC v. Town of Wells, 2003 ME 149, ¶ 3, fn. 4, 836 A.2d 1285, 1286, fn.4. … The Board of Environmental Protection's August 11, 2005 order is affirmed.

Nekich v. Wis. Cent. Ltd.

290 F. Supp. 3d 890 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 17, 2017

See McKay v. U.S. … See Hanebrink v.