Case law

Leinenweber v. Brown

24 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1893

The allegation that the defendant Brown had knowledge of and participated in the proceedings with the purpose of obtaining the land at an inadequate and unfair price, is too vague and uncertain to charge fraud; and, besides … Eddy, 4 Or. 225 ; Dolph v. Barney, 5 Or. 191; Wright v. Young, 6 Or. 87 ; McRea v. Daviner, 8 Or. 63 . Affirmed.

Hazell v. Brown

238 Or. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 2010

State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009); see also Ecumenical Ministries v. … See Meyer v.

State v. Brown

296 Or. 458 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1984

Brown, 296 Or 461 , 676 P2d 877 (1984). … We restricted review in this case and the companion case, State v.

Richards v. Brown

345 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2025

Affirmed. 322 Richards v. Brown EGAN, J. … No such exception exists for affirmative defenses. 328 Richards v. Brown prohibited special verdict.

State v. Brown

296 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1984

We restricted review in this case and the companion case, State v. … See, State v. Turner, 296 Or 451 , 676 P2d 873 (1984). We affirm the Court of Appeals.

Taylor v. Brown

49 Or. 423 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1907

Rep. 836 ); Casto v. Murray, 47 Or. 57 ( 81 Pac. 883 ). … Wong Fook, 13 Or. 577 ( 11 Pac. 277 ); Lewis v. Birdsey, 19 Or. 164 ( 26 Pac. 623 ); Fisher v. Kelly, *426 30 Or. 1 ( 46 Pac. 146 ).

State v. Brown

6 Or. App. 523 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 1971

State v. Brown

113 Or. 149 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1924

See the recent case of State v. Harris, 106 Or. 211 ( 211 Pac. 944 ). … Hubbard, it was in the nighttime that Brown delivered the still. She knew of *156 Brown’s visit on one particular night.

Brown v. Farrell

258 Or. 348 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1971

Justice McBride in Bartels v. McCullough, 102 Or 66 , 201 P 733 (1921): “In Mason v. … Franklin S&L v. Hallmark, supra. We will next deal with the Browns’ and A&R’s appeal from the trial court’s holding that Allen’s lien was valid.

Davis v. Brown

280 Or. 561 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1977

Brown taken April 8, 1976, marked Exhibit 'B’.” The stipulation of Brown shows that he made the mistake negligently. … Since compromise agreements will not be set aside for ordinary mistakes, Klussman v. Day, 107 Or 109, 116 , 213 P 787 , 214 P 348 (1923), they should not be set aside for negligent mistakes. Cf. Wheeler v.

Sievers v. Brown

36 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1899

In Gates v. … Notes] 523; Moore v. Smedburgh, 8 Paige, 600 ; Bank of Columbia v. Hagner, 26 U. S. (1 Pet.) 455 ; Taft v. Kessel, 16 Wis. 273 ; Baston v. Clifford, 68 Ill. 67 , 18 Am. Rep. 547 ; Martin v.

State v. Brown

106 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 1991

Defendant Brown had shown the informant 10 clear plastic bags that she said contained methamphetamine. … See State v. Crotsley, 308 Or 272 , 779 P2d 600 (1989); State v. Owens, 102 Or App 448 , 450 n 2, 795 P2d 569 , rev den 311 Or 13 (1990); State v. Atkinson, supra.

Brown v. SAIF Corp.

361 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2017

Throughout this opinion we use “combined condition” as the same shorthand phrase for both. 244 Brown v. SAIF court and this one. Brown v. … See, e.g., Luckhurst v. Bank of 256 Brown v.

Brown v. Dearborn

52 Or. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1981

In Lee v. Brown, 264 Or 341 , 505 P2d 924 (1973), it was used to support this proposition: "Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy at law to which the rules of procedure relating to actions at law are applicable.” … Justice Rossman, specially concurring in Lafferty v.

Brown v. Fields

160 Or. 23 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1938

Lovell Auto Co., 157 Or. 534 ( 72 P. (2d) 61 ); Hamp v. Universal Auto Co., 173 Wash. 585 ( 24 P. (2d) 77 ); Bertrand v. Mutual Motor Co., (Tex.) 38 S. W. (2d) 417 ; Harts v. Raney, 202 N. C. 807 ( 164 S. … R. 628); Steele v. Hemmers, 149 Or. 381 ( 40 P. (2d) 1022 ); Kantola v. Lovell Auto Co., supra. Counsel for plaintiff relies upon Miller v.

Brown v. Gatti

195 Or. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2004

Timothy Brown.’ … Brown and is now going after the pages where Brown advertised.

State v. Brown

141 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1996

In State v. Meyrick, 313 Or 125 , 831 P2d 666 (1992), the court explained the characteristics of a valid waiver of the right to counsel under section 11. … ” Id. at 133-34 (footnote omitted; *162 emphasis supplied; see also State v. Cole, 323 Or 30 , 912 P2d 907 (1996)). 2.

Brown v. Bonesteele

218 Or. 312 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1959

Lacey v. Oregon R. & N. Co., 63 Or 596 , 128 P 999 (1913); Brown, Personal Property (2d ed 1955), p 416. As a contract carrier or lessor he would be liable only if the loss resulted from his fault. … Dunn v. Henderson, 122 Or 331 , 258 P 183 (1927); cf., Scott v. Brogan, 157 Or 549 , 73 P2d 688 (1937); Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 180 Or 409 , 177 P2d 429 (1947) ; Oliver v.

Emery v. Brown

63 Or. 264 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1912

Johnson v. Iankovetz, 57 Or. 24 ( 102 Pac. 799 : 110 Pac. 398 : 29 L. R. A. [N.S.] 709). *266 2. The second objection is well taken. … Kelley v. Pike, 17 Or. 330 ( 20 Pac. 685 ); McCarty v. Wintler, 17 Or. 391 ( 21 Pac. 195 ); Connor v. Clark, 30 Or. 382 ( 48 Pac. 364 ). The appeal will be dismissed. Dismissed.

Booher v. Brown

173 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1944

Richardson v. Orth, 40 Or. 252 , 66 P. 925 ; Hawkins v. Doe, 60 Or. 437 , 119 P. 754 , Ann. Cas. 1914A, 765; Mathews v. Tobias, 101 Or. 605 , 201 P. 199 ; Brennen v. Derby, 124 Or. 574 , 265 P. 425 ; Losey v. … O’Hair, 160 Or. 63 , 83 P. (2d) 493 ; Harris v. Craven, 162, Or. 1, 91 P. (2d) 302 ; Stever v. Holt, 164 Or. 195 , 100 P. (2d) 1016 .