Case law

Harrelson v. Brown

131 Okla. 267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1928

See, also, Mitchell v. Bruce, 85 Okla. 53 , 204 Pac. 281 ; Baber v. Overton, 80 Okla. 128 , 194 Pac. 893 ; Incorporated Town of Guyman v. Triplett, 71 Okla. 298 , 177 Pac. 570 ; Brown v. … See, also, Steger Lumber Co. v. Haynes et al. v. 42 Okla. 716 , 142 Pac. 1031 ; Oklahoma City v. McMaster, 12 Okla. 570 , 73 Pac. 1012 ; Hocker v. Rackley, 90 Okla. 83 , 216 Pac. 151 ; Rourke v.

Jent v. Brown

280 P.2d 1005 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1955

Jones v. Jones, 194 Okl. 228 , 148 P.2d 989 . … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Donnelly

9 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 26, 1899

.: The plaintiff in error concedes that the questions involved in this case are substantially the same as those decided by this court in Black v. Jackson, 6. Okla. 751. … Nothing is presented by counsel in his argument of this cause which will justify the court in reversing its ruling in the Black v. Jackson case, and the law as therein stated is approved.

Brown v. State

550 P.2d 963 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 1976

In our recent decision of Crandell v. State, Okl.Cr., 539 P.2d 398 , we held that there are no alternative methods of initiating juvenile proceedings against a child charged with a violation of a State statute. … In J.T.P. v.

Jones v. Brown

140 Okla. 155 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1929

In addition, the court therein approves another doctrine quoted from the case of Huxley v. … In the ease of Watts v. Jackson, 75 Okla. 123 . at page 124, 182 Pac. 508 , Judge Rainey, quoting from the case of Young v. Murphy, 120 Wis. 49 , 97 N.

Henry v. Brown

190 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1942

Brown and Agnes Brown, his wife, against Cecil Henry, Grant R. McCullough, and the board of county commissioners and the county *110 treasurer of said county to quiet title to certain real property. … In Grimes v.

Brown v. State

578 P.2d 364 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1978

While the Supreme Court in Burgett v. … In State v.

Brown v. State

6 Okla. Crim. 442 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1911

Brown, and applies to the court for a change of judge in said action, and states as his ground therefor that the presiding judge of said *443 county court is prejudiced and biased against said defendant, and that said defendant … Eubanks v. Cole, District Judge, 4 Okla. Cr. 25, 109 Pac. 736 , it is said: “A mandamus to an inferior court is in the nature of appellate jurisdiction.

Brown v. State

496 P.2d 395 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1972

(Tr. 85-88) Defendant cites as authority the case of Little v. … In Webb v.

Brown v. State

443 P.2d 118 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1968

This Court held in Chase v. … In Gershon v.

Brown v. Fraser

467 P.2d 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1970

Board of Adjustment of Oklahoma City et al. v. Shanbour (1967), Okl., 435 P.2d 569 ; Twist et al. v. Kay (1967), Okl., 434 P.2d 180 . In Van Meter et al. v. H. F. … Pierce from Ruling of Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa (1959), Okl., 347 P.2d 790 , and Board of Adjustment of City of Oklahoma City et al. v.

Brown v. Bivings

277 P.2d 671 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1954

Webb v. Moran, 186 Okl. 140 , 96 P.2d 308 . … Catlett v. Jordan, 206 Okl. 473 , 244 P.2d 564 ; Staton v. Moody, 208 Okl. 372 , 256 P.2d 409 . Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to enter judgment for defendant. JOHNSON, V. C.

Drumright v. Brown

76 Okla. 162 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1919

Aaron Drumright et ah, citizens of Drumright, Okla., brought action against Frank Brown, R. D. … Doop & Frater, 39 Okla. 427 , 135 Pac. 393 ; Farley v. Board of Education, 62 Oklahoma, 162 Pac. 797 ; Bearman v. Dux Oil & Gas Co., 64 Oklahoma, 166 Pac. 199 .

Brown v. Thompson

84 Okla. 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1921

Hi Brown, and against the defendants Columbus H. and Francis DeFord, James T. and Mary E. … Brown, filed his motion for a new trial, which was overruled by the court, and from which judgment overruling the same the said O. H. Brown, plaintiff, and P. G. Utley, administrator of the .estate of R. H.

Brown v. State

5 Okla. Crim. 667 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1911

Brazell v. Brown

169 Okla. 623 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

In the case of McClure v. … See, also, Chamberlain v. Lesley, 39 Fla. 452 , 22 So. 736 .

Brown v. Chaddick

197 Okla. 515 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 1946

The *517 probability is that it was a clerical or typographical error, and even under the requirement of the rule in Brown v. Mudd, 173 Okla. 152 , 47 P. 2d 109 , the name of the last record owner was given. … Baughman v. Baughman, 32 Kan. 538 , 4 P. 1003 ; Carney v. Brown, 110 Okla. 165 , 237 P. 111 ; Campbell v. Dick, 71 Okla. 186 , 176 P. 520 ; Conwill v. Eldridge, 35 Okla. 537 , 130 P. 912 .

Brown v. Briggs

292 P.2d 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1955

Co. v. State, 203 Okl. 659 , 225 P.2d 363 . … Harding v. Taylor, Okl., 272 P.2d 443 .

Constant v. Brown

189 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1941

And in Cain’s Coffee Co. v. … In Westlake v.

Brown v. State

274 P.2d 779 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1954

Green v. State, 7 Okl.Cr. 194 , 122 P. 1108 ; Brown v. State, 9 Okl.Cr. 382 , 132 P. 359 . “Direct evidence to establish the corpus delicti is not required. … In Williams v.