Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.68s
4 Paige Ch. 88 · New York Court of Chancery · Apr 2, 1833
In the case of Whitmarsh v. … (See Hodgson v. Butterfield, 2 Sim. & Stu. 236.)
Cited 8 timesPublished82 Misc. 2d 759 · New York City Family Court · Jun 24, 1975
The instant action was originated by the filing of a petition for support, verified the 21st day of July, 1972, by Marilyn Brown, petitioner, against Ermes A. Brown, respondent. … (Matter of Hoover v Hoover, 74 Misc 2d 13 .) An allowance of counsel fees on a motion for a modification of support is always discretionary. (Sullivan v Sullivan, 55 Misc 2d 691 , affd 29 AD2d 739 .)
Cited 2 timesPublishedSams v. New York State Board of Parole
352 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1972
352 F.Supp. 296 (1972) Bobby Lee SAMS, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE et al., Defendants. No. 72 Civ. 2074. United States District Court, S. D. New York. December 11, 1972. *297 William E. … See Egan v. City of Aurora, 365 U.S. 514 , 81 S.Ct. 684 , 5 L.Ed.2d 741 (1961) (per curiam); Brown v. Town of Caliente, 392 F.2d 546 (9th Cir. 1968); Fisher v.
Cited 11 timesPublished50 A.D.2d 32 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 12, 1975
The instant action, however, was commenced pursuant to section 1983 of title 42 of the United States Code, which is not a tort action Romer v Leary, 425 F2d 186; Swan v Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. … Hyde v McGinnis, 429 F2d 864; Coppinger v Townsend, 398 F2d 392, 394; Stiltner v Rhay, 371 F2d 420, cert den 386 US 997 ).
Cited 19 timesPublished235 A.D.2d 383 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1997
As an equitable interest holder of property held in a constructive trust (see, Rosenberg v Rosenberg, 215 AD2d 365 ), the former wife must share in any losses or gains attributable to the fiduciary’s investment of that property
Cited 1 timesPublished64 A.D. 544 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1901
Thus, in Cook v. … (Finch v. Carpenter, 29 Hun, 268 .)
Cited 1 timesPublished6 Misc. 433 · New York City Court · Jan 15, 1894
Brown, was substituted as defendant herein. … In Massey v. Mutual Relief Society of Rochester, 102 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished612 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 6, 2009
The Workers’ Compensation Board’s findings were affirmed by a Memorandum of Board Panel Decision on September 26, 2008. Id. … Any Workers’ Compensation Board determination must be given res judicata effect by this court where, as here, the findings by the Board are made in adjudicatory proceedings and “where the board makes discrete findings of
Cited 4 timesPublished255 A.D.2d 209 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 1998
To the extent there may be any conflict between the judgment and the parties’ earlier oral stipulation of settlement, the judgment governs (see, Rainbow v Swisher, 72 NY2d 106, 110 ). Concur — Sullivan, J.
Cited 1 timesPublished54 A.D. 6 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1900
I give, devise and bequeath to my children, John Brown, Sebastian Brown and Edward Brown, all of the. real estate of which I shall die seized and possessed, share and share alike, *7 providing however, that said real estate … (Oxley v. Lane, 35 N. Y. 349 ; Harrison v. Harrison, 36 id. 543; Henderson v. Henderson, 113 id. 1.)
Cited 2 timesPublished263 A.D.2d 455 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 6, 1999
of discretion for the trial court, which is in the best position to determine whether a mistrial is required under the circumstances of the case, and its decision must be accorded great deference (see, Matter of Plummer v … Accordingly, there is no bar to a retrial (see, Matter of Plummer v Rothwax, supra; Matter of Martin v Hynes, 259 AD2d 547 ; Matter of Spivack v Brown, 259 AD2d 488 ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown & Brown, Inc. v. Johnson
115 A.D.3d 162 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014
Plaintiff Brown & Brown, Inc. (BBI) is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Florida, and it is the parent corporation of plaintiff Brown & Brown of New York, Inc. (BBNY). … , 484-485 [2012]; Brown & Brown, Inc. v Mudron, 379 Ill App 3d 724, 727-728, 887 NE2d 437, 440 [2008]; Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v South Cent.
Cited 6 timesPublished191 A.D.2d 301 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 1993
Cited 1 timesPublished65 A.D.2d 936 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1978
Cited 0 timesPublished230 A.D. 716 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1930
Order denying motion of defendants Brown and Swasey for leave to serve a conditional cross complaint affirmed, without costs. … the denials contained in their answer, facts showing that tho trustee misappropriated and used in the purchase of the property in question the funds of the trust created for the appellants’ benefit by the will of Augusta Brown
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna