Case law

Cox v. Brown

498 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 1980

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc., 182 U.S.App. D.C. 220, 222-23, 559 F.2d 841, 843-44 (1977). … See Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 24 , 94 S.Ct. 1028, 1040 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).

Rossi v. Brown

467 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 1979

Altman & Co. v. … Altman & Co. v.

Brown v. Weschler

135 F. Supp. 622 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 1955

Jones v. Elliott, D.C.E.D.Va.1950, 94 F.Supp. 567 ; Ferris v. Farnsworth Television & *624 Radio Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1947, 8 F.R.D. 489 ; Texas Employers Ins. Ass’n v. … See Erick Rios Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 1954, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 369 , 214 F.2d 207 .

Collins v. Brown

268 F. Supp. 198 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 1967

In Erlich v. … In Brown v. Coates, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 253 F.2d 36 , 67 A.L.R.2d 943 , the Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment for the plaintiff in an action brought by one Coates against Sidney J.

Stevens v. Brown

194 A.2d 126 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1963

194 A.2d 126 (1963) Betty Moxley STEVENS, Appellant, v. William H. BROWN, Appellee. No. 3290. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued July 1, 1963. Decided October 7, 1963. *127 D. Robert Cervera, Washington, D. … Clark v. Clark, 148 Fla. 452 , 4 So.2d 517 ; Farrell v. Ellsworth, Sup., 52 N.Y.S.2d 513 ; Rodney v. Adams, Ky., 268 S.W.2d 940 ; Guyette v. Haley, 286 App.Div. 451 , 144 N.Y.S.2d 493 ; Richter v.

Williams v. District of Columbia Department of General Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 2024

Simpson were on the brief for appellee Public Employee Relations Board. Before EASTERLY, MCLEESE, and SHANKER, Associate Judges. … (quoting Brown v. Plant, 157 A.2d 289, 291 (D.C. 1960))); D.C. App. R. 16(b) (allowing parties to supplement the record “at any time” by stipulation).

Story v. Rives

97 F.2d 182 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1938

An indeterminate sentence is one for the maximum period imposed by the court, subject to termination by the Parole Board at any time after service of the minimum period. In United States ex rel. Paladino v. … (N.S.) 931, 20 Ann.Cas. 1217; Commonwealth v. Brown, 167 Mass. 144 , 45 N.E. 1 ; Commonwealth v. Kalck, 239 Pa. 533 , 87 A. 61 ; Woods v. State, 130 Tenn. 100 , 169 S.W. 558 , L.R.A. 1915F, 531 ; State v.

Brown v. Mabus

892 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 2012

Brown v. Garrett, No. 90- 1003, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13062, at *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 28, 1990). … Memorandum, Brown v. Dep’t of the Navy, No. 86-1582 (D.D.C. filed Aug. 11, 2003) at 1. The Court denied the plaintiff’s motion, see Order, Brown v.

Winding v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2026

WINDING, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25 - 4474 (UNA) DEBRA M. BROWN, Defendant. … Davis v. U.S. Sentencing Comm’n, 716 F.3d 660, 666 (D.C.

Brown v. Cooke

219 A.2d 256 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1966

Manos v. Fickenscher, D.C.Mun.App., 62 A.2d 791 . … Miller v. Werner, D.C.App., 185 A.2d 723 . See also Blacker v. Rod, D.C.Mun.App., 87 A.2d 634 .

Brown v. Berrien

923 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2013

Smith v. Case/las, 119 F.3d 33, 34 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 958 (1997); McCottrell v. … See Caraveo v. US. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm 'n, 96 F.

National Labor Relations Board v. Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters

826 F.3d 460 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 2016

RESPONDENT v. … We “may consider only the Board’s own reasons, not the rationalizations of counsel.” Charlotte Amphitheater Corp. v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 1074, 1080 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (citing SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 95 (1943)).

Brown v. Colvin

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DONALD BROWN, JR., Plaintiff, v.

Jenkins v. McHugh

258 F. Supp. 3d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2017

Accordingly, the Court will remand this matter to the [board] for further consideration.”); Hill v. Geren, 597 F. … .”); Allen v. Card, 799 F. Supp. 158, 166 (D.D.C. 1992) (remanding to the board despite plaintiffs’ arguments that the board had previously delayed appropriate relief). Mr.

Brown v. Barnhart

370 F. Supp. 2d 286 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 2005

See Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 706 ; Stankiewicz v. Sullivan, 901 F.2d 131 (D.C.Cir.1990). C. … See Marcus v.

Fitzgerald v. Sigler

372 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1974

It is well settled that the Board is vested with discretionary power. Zerbst v. Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359 , 58 S.Ct. 872 , 82 L.Ed. 1399 (1938); Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, supra. … Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, supra, 366 F.Supp. at 272 .

Said v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2016

. § 153); see also Abdul-Qawiy, 2005 WL 3201271, at *3 (same), or alternatively, by a special board of adjustment, commonly known as a public law board, see, e.g., CSX Transp., Inc. v. … In other words, she has not demonstrated that the Adjustment Board would “have refused to provide the relief that [she] seeks.” Id. at *5; see also Emswiler v.

Brown v. Safeway

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2025

BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … (citing Carroll v. Merriwether, 921 F.

Riggsbee v. Diversity Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2009

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1131 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457).

Brown v. Mattis

701 F. App'x 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2017

Thus, unlike in Porter v. Shah, 606 F.3d 809 (D.C. Cir. 2010), the contempt decision does not serve as a res judicata bar to the instant case.