Case law

Meriweather v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

140 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 1996

jurisdictional issue, Meriweather v. … Dept. v.

Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners

351 Or. 219 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 2011

Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of 9 Commissioners, 237 Or App 149, 238 P3d 1016 (2010). … Washington County v. Stark, 10 Or App 384, 499 P2d 1337 15 (1972); Town of Hempstead v. Lynne, supra; Board of Supervisors of Scott 16 County v.

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry

325 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1997

See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (S42159), 325 Or 185 , 935 P2d 411 (1997). … Nollan v.

Norris v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

237 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 2010

As support for that understanding, the board invokes Delavega v. … State v.

Maney v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 5, 2024

V. … See Daubert v.

Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

140 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1996

He contends that the Board violated applicable law by failing to hold a hearing before issuing the order. He asks us to reverse the order and to remand with specific instructions that the Board release petitioner. … See, e.g., Floyd v. Motor Vehicles Div., 27 Or App 41, 44-45 , 554 P2d 1024 , rev den 276 Or 873 (1976). Affirmed.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

298 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1984

The Trial Board found Brown not guilty of both causes of complaint. … It weighed Brown’s testimony before the Trial Board against him.

Paris v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 9, 2024

Petitioner Arnaud Paris and Respondent Heidi Marie Brown are the parents of twin girls, aged nine. … On October 20, 2022, Petitioner filed his first petition for return of the children to France under the Hague Convention in Paris v. Brown, Case No. 1:22-cv-01593- MC (Paris I). That petition was heard by U.S.

Williford v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

137 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1995

Petitioner argues that the Board erred in imposing active supervision until the end of his indeterminate sentence. We agree. Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995). … Petitioner also argues that the Board erred in applying community notification statutes to him. We review for violation of a constitutional or statutory provision. ORS 183.482(8)(b); Calderon-Pacheco v.

Taylor Sands Fishing Co. v. State Land Board

56 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1910

Co. v. Illinois, 146 U. S. 387, 435 (13 Sup. Ct. 110: 36 L. Ed. 1018 ). … As analogous to the principle thus announced, see Dunn v. State Ummersity, 9 Or. 357, 362 ; and Salem Mills Co. v. Lord, 42 Or. 82, 90 ( 69 Pac. 1033 : 70 Pac. 832 .)

Hibbard v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

144 Or. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 1996

In Eggsman v. Board of Parole, 60 Or App 381, 385-86 , 653 P2d 1277 (1982), we held that, under the general statutory grant of authority to parole, the Board is authorized to advance the prison release date. … In Gress v. Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 (1996), which involves virtually identical arguments, we rejected that premise.

Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

266 Or. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2014

Board of Parole, 343 Or 618 , 175 P3d 461 (2007) (Gordon I); Gordon v. … Gordon v. Board of Parole, 239 Or App 603 , 245 P3d 671 (2010).

Sledge v. Oregon Public Employes Retirement Board

112 Or. App. 335 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992

Appellant appeals from a summary judgment in this circuit court review of an order of the Public Employes Retirement Board that determined his retirement benefits. We affirm. No facts are in dispute. … account in the Variable Annuity Account * * * and whose effective date of retirement is August 21, 1981,[ 2 ] or later, is otherwise entitled under ORS 237.001 to 237.315 shall be subject to the following adjustment: “(a) The board

Roberts v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

221 Or. App. 278 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 2008

In Brumnett v. … In Weems v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 70 , 190 P3d 381 (2008) we rejected the same argument that petitioner raises here.

Schuch v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

139 Or. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 1996

The Board’s determination that petitioner is a predatory sex offender was not outside the range of the discretion delegated to it by law. ORS 183.482(8); Evensizer v. Board of Parole, 301 Or 403 , 723 P2d 318 (1986). … In Williford v. Board of Parole, 137 *332 Or App 254, 904 P2d 1074 (1995), we concluded that it does not. Petitioner does not articulate any other reasons why such an act implicates his liberty interests.

Miller v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

261 Or. App. 795 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 2014

Accordingly, we do not address whether the board could — or did — appropriately adjust petitioner’s matrix calculation at the 2011 hearing. 3 Accord Rivas v. … There, we had dismissed as moot a prisoner’s habeas corpus challenge to a January 1997 board order that deferred his parole-release date under ORS 144.125(3). Hamel v.

Board of School Land Commissioners v. Wiley

10 Or. 86 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

(Raymond v. Coffer, 5 Or., 132 ; Wade v. Deray, 50 Cal., 376 ; Heaton v. Hodges, 30 Amer. Decis., 736, note. … (Wade v. Deary, 50 Cal., 376 ; C ampon v. Godfrey et al., 18 Mich., 27 .)

Melvin v. State Board of Higher Education

17 Or. App. 216 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 15, 1974

Petitioner’s contentions have been decided adversely to her in Starns v. Malkerson, 326 F Supp 234 (D Minn 1970), which the United States Supreme Court affirmed without opinion at 401 US 985 (1971). See also, Vlandis v. … Kline, 412 US 441 , 93 S Ct 2230 , 37 L Ed 2d 63, n 9 (1973), citing Starns with approval, and n 12 and accompanying text in Memorial Hospital et al v.

Allred v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 278 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

. *281 We considered and rejected the same argument in Teague v. Board of Parole, 105 Or App 1 , 803 P2d 279 (1990), rev den 311 Or 187 (1991). … Petitioner also argues that the Board erred in not considering his efforts at voluntary restitution as a mitigating factor. The Board did initially refuse to consider that as a mitigating factor.

Wyatt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

230 Or. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 2009

person is adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order of the board; and “(b) The person has exhausted administrative review as provided by board rule.” … Generally speaking, a person is adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order of the board if he or she did not obtain the relief sought on administrative review. Richards v.