Case law

Huntington v. Board of Com'rs of Grant County

44 Okla. 276 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1914

Orendorff v. Board of Commissioners, ante, 144 Pac. 383 , and Ham *278 ilton et al. v. Board of Commisisoners, post, were suits against the other two county commissioners during the same period. The suit Anderson v. … Board of Commissioners, ante, 143 Pac. 1145 , is a suit against the county treasurer. Zeigler v.

State ex rel. Sizemore v. State Election Board

203 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 25, 1950

On March 30, 1950, the secretary of the State Election Board notified all county election board secretaries that: “Pursuant to the provisions of Title 26, Section 114, O. … In this connection the Board calls attention to the title of 25 O.

Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson

167 Okla. 253 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1934

Com’rs v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 P. 592 ; Butler v. Bd. of Com’rs, 57 Okla. 748 , 157 P. 912 ; Western Paint Co. v. Bd. of Com’rs, 161 Okla. 300 , 18 P. (2d) 888 ; Bd. of Com’rs of Hughes Co. v. … The rule as to the requisite proof of intention to dedicate is well stated in Lewis v.

Poe v. Board of Comrs. of Pawnee Co.

8 Okla. 703 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

Per Curiam: The same questions are involved and the same briefs have been filed in this case by counsel as in the case of Johnson v. … Board of Com’rs. ( 7 Okla. 686 ,) and the same findings of fact and conclusions of law were made by the court below.

McGrath v. Rrown

190 Okla. 144 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 20, 1941

the proceedings for the reason that all questions presented had become moot, since Brown- had completed the well for which the permit was issued (Keaton v. … In Reinhart & Donovan Co. v.

Boyer v. State Board of Examiners of Psychologists

63 O.B.A.J. 2519 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1992

The Board’s action on Boyer’s application was not an “individual proceeding”, and, as noted in Stewart v. Rood, Boyer had no right to appeal to District Court. … Rather, he seeks to compel the Board to act in a particular way. Mandamus does not lie to compel an official to exercise discretion in a particular way, unless discretion has been clearly abused. Draper v.

Citizens Security Bank & Trust v. Banking Board of Oklahoma

627 P.2d 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1981

Brown v. Banking Board, Okl., 512 P.2d 166, 168 [1973] (Brown I); Brown v. Banking Board, Okl., 579 P.2d 1267, 1271 [1978] (Brown II). . … Bank of Commerce, Stillwell v. Banking Board, Okl., 534 P.2d 923, 924 [1975]; In re Bank of Bixby v. Banking Board, Okl., 524 P.2d 14, 16 [1974]. . In re Bank of Bixby v.

King v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior College

541 P.2d 836 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1975

We conclude the Board’s decision not to re-employ the nontenured instructors did not deprive them of their liberty. In Board of Regents v. … In Papadopoulos v.

Morgan v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 5, 2022

Harmon v. City of Norman, Oklahoma, 981 F.3d 1141, 1146 (10th Cir. 2020) (quoting Benisek v. Lamone, 138 S.Ct. 1942 (2018), quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008)). … In reply, Morgan posits that the promissory notes are not resources under the Tenth Circuit’s decisions in Rose as next friend of Rose v. Brown, 14 F.4th 1129 (10th Cir. 2021) and Gragert v. Lake, 541 Fed.

Brown v. Petegrew

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 26, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JAMES BROWN, ) … See Leatherwood v. Allbaugh, 861 F.3d 1034, 1041 (10th Cir. 2017). Petitioner’s arguments to the contrary are unpersuasive. Ti.

Board of Equalization v. People's Nat. Bank of Kingfisher

79 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1920

Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. First State Bank of Oklahoma City, 77 Okla. 291 , 188 Pac. 115 ; Brown v. Hennessey State Bank, 78 Okla. 141 , 189 Pac. 355 . Second. … Board of Equalization of Oklahoma County v. First. State Bank of Oklahoma City, supra; Brown v. Hennessey State Bank, supra; First Nat. Bank of Junction City v.

Morris v. Board of Com'rs of Love County

74 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1917

In Bowles v. Oklahoma City et al., 24 Okla. 579 , 104 Pac. 902 (24 L. R. A. [N. … The decision is followed by this court in Boone v.

Board of Com'rs of Adair County v. Ragg

194 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1944

See, in this connection, Whiteneck v. Board of County Commissioners, 89 Okla. 52 , 213 P. 865 ; Hazlett v. Board of County Commissioners, 168 Okla. 290 , 32 P. 2d 940 . … In Continental Casualty Co. v.

Crawford v. Board of Comrs. of Noble County

8 Okla. 450 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 24, 1899

In Goose River Bank v. Willow Lake School Tp., 1 N. D. 26 , 44 N. … In Hampton v.

Whittinghill v. Board of Com'rs of Woodward County

68 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1918

Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 Pac. 565 ; Anderson v. Board of Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 165 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Baker v. … News-Dispatcb Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Grady County, 61 Okla. 259, 161 Pac. 207 ; Chase v. Board of Commissioners, 37 Colo. 268 , 86 Pac. 1011 , 11 Ann. Cas. 483.

Morgan v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 13, 2022

See, Pecha by and through Pecha-Weber v. Lake, 700 Fed. Appx. 840, 841 (10th Cir. 2017) (unpublished decision cited as persuasive pursuant to 10th Cir. … We answer yes.”); see also, Estate of Schultz v. Brown, 846 Fed. Appx. 689, 695 (10th Cir. 2021) (“‘[T]he dead are not susceptible to continuing or future harm. . . .’”

Schulte v. Board of County Com'rs Pontotoc Co.

122 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1926

party, the authority of the board to employ counsel was not limited by the rule laid down in Honnold v. … Board of County Commissioners, supra, and as supporting this contention he cites Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County v.

Board of Com'rs of Blaine County v. Foster

169 Okla. 384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1934

•In this state it has been determined that the county has the right of appeal from a judgment rendered against it (Rice v. Swartz, 90 Okla. 16 , 215 P. 605 ; Board of County Commissioners of Craig County v. Germo Mfg. … Co., 71 Okla. 237 , 176 P. 902 ; Sequoyah County v.

Brown v. Graham

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2022

BROWN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) … Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 740-41 (2001); Yousef v. Reno, 254 F.3d 1214, 1216 n.1 (10th Cir. 2001).

Gaines v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 18, 2022

CIV-22-447-J KEVIN BROWN, et al., Defendants. … See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc.