Case law

Matter of Compensation of Brown

52 Or. App. 191 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 11, 1981

The employer requested review by the Workers’ Compensation Board. ORS 656.295. … See also Dimitroff v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 209 Or 316, 333 , 306 P2d 398 (1957); Pratt v.

Coyle v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 27, 2024

A at 3, Maney v. Brown, No. 6:20-cv-00570-SB (D. Or. Dec. 9, 2022), ECF No. 421-1. … Similarly, Coyle does not allege any conduct specific to Governor Brown. See Gardner v. Brown, No. 2:21-cv-1256-SB, 2024 WL 1155381, at *6 (D. Or.

Jones v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

231 Or. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 2009

In State v. … Stephens v. Bohlman, 314 Or 344 , 350 n 6, 838 P2d 600 (1992).

Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

272 Or. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 2015

See Blachana, LLC v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 354 Or 676, 687 , 318 P3d 735 (2014). … See State v.

Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

284 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 2017

In Alexander v. … Morrison v.

Butler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

194 Or. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 2004

In Shelby v. … See Kansas v.

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry

325 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1997

See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (S42159), 325 Or 185 , 935 P2d 411 (1997). … Nollan v.

Dunmire v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

262 Or. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 7, 2014

A petitioner’s discharge from parole requires “some action on the part of the board” and does not occur “by operation of law” because the board fails to act by the tentative parole discharge date. Haskins v. … Green v. Baldwin, 204 Or App 351, 354-55 , 129 P3d 734 (2006); see also Odle v.

Williford v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

137 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1995

Petitioner argues that the Board erred in imposing active supervision until the end of his indeterminate sentence. We agree. Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995). … Petitioner also argues that the Board erred in applying community notification statutes to him. We review for violation of a constitutional or statutory provision. ORS 183.482(8)(b); Calderon-Pacheco v.

Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

266 Or. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2014

Board of Parole, 343 Or 618 , 175 P3d 461 (2007) (Gordon I); Gordon v. … Gordon v. Board of Parole, 239 Or App 603 , 245 P3d 671 (2010).

Engweiler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

170 Or. App. 653 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 1, 2000

ORS 144.335 does significantly restrict our review of the Board’s orders. See Quintero v. Board of Parole, 329 Or 319 , 986 P2d 575 (1999). … See Eggsman v.

Sledge v. Oregon Public Employes Retirement Board

112 Or. App. 335 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992

Appellant appeals from a summary judgment in this circuit court review of an order of the Public Employes Retirement Board that determined his retirement benefits. We affirm. No facts are in dispute. … account in the Variable Annuity Account * * * and whose effective date of retirement is August 21, 1981,[ 2 ] or later, is otherwise entitled under ORS 237.001 to 237.315 shall be subject to the following adjustment: “(a) The board

Roberts v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

221 Or. App. 278 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 2008

In Brumnett v. … In Weems v. Board of Parole, 221 Or App 70 , 190 P3d 381 (2008) we rejected the same argument that petitioner raises here.

Schuch v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

139 Or. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 1996

The Board’s determination that petitioner is a predatory sex offender was not outside the range of the discretion delegated to it by law. ORS 183.482(8); Evensizer v. Board of Parole, 301 Or 403 , 723 P2d 318 (1986). … In Williford v. Board of Parole, 137 *332 Or App 254, 904 P2d 1074 (1995), we concluded that it does not. Petitioner does not articulate any other reasons why such an act implicates his liberty interests.

Rogue Flyfishers, Inc. v. Water Policy Review Board

62 Or. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 1983

. * * *” 26 Or App at 151 . 2 Later, in United Parcel v. Transp. … Nonetheless, the mere existence of ORS 536.560 leaves us with a question: Did the passage of ORS 183.400 work an implied repeal of ORS 536.560, see League of Women Voters v. Lane Co.

Miller v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

275 Or. App. 844 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 2015

.”); see also Dunmire v. … We observed in Green v.

McCline v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

205 Or. App. 144 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2006

The board explained that, in conformity to the ex post facto clauses of the Oregon and United States constitutions as construed in Williams v. … Trebesch v. Employment Division, 300 Or 264, 270 , 710 P2d 136 (1985); Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 304-05, 313-14 , 605 P2d 273 (1980); Dinkins v.

Hensley v. State Court System Appeals Board

72 Or. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1985

The Board finds that the primary motivation for the decision was cost and efficiency. … The Board shall review disciplinary actions when an employe invokes the procedures set forth in Rule 10.7. The decisions of the Board shall be final.”

McKinley v. Owyhee Project North Board of Control

103 Or. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 1990

James v. Carnation Co., 278 Or 65, 69 , 562 P2d 1192 (1977); see Adams v. Knoth, 102 Or App 238, 242 , 794 P2d 796 (1990). … Relying on Crawford v.

Abraham v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

272 Or. App. 173 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 1, 2015

Furthermore, the state asserts that, in light of the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision in Mastriano v. … final orders); Eli v.