Case law

Board of Com'rs of Adair County v. Ragg

194 Okla. 62 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1944

See, in this connection, Whiteneck v. Board of County Commissioners, 89 Okla. 52 , 213 P. 865 ; Hazlett v. Board of County Commissioners, 168 Okla. 290 , 32 P. 2d 940 . … In Continental Casualty Co. v.

Winton v. Board of Commissioners

188 F.R.D. 398 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 16, 1999

Co. v. National Presto Indus., Inc., 709 F.2d 1109 , 1118 (7th Cir.1983). See also Janicker v. … See, e.g., Coastal States Gas Corp. v.

Sadler v. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County

162 Okla. 303 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1933

court of Mayes county, a judgment was entered against the plaintiffs in error sustaining a demurrer to the petition of plaintiffs in error respecting the claims as to certain property sold and resold and bought in by the board … Mires v. Hogan, 79 Okla. 233 , 192 P. 811 . The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Morris v. Board of Com'rs of Love County

74 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1917

In Bowles v. Oklahoma City et al., 24 Okla. 579 , 104 Pac. 902 (24 L. R. A. [N. … The decision is followed by this court in Boone v.

Brown v. Yates

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Sep 25, 2023

Hutchinson v. Pfeil, 105 F.3d 562, 564 (10th Cir. 1997). … Tuckel v. Grover, 660 F.3d 1249, 1254 (10th Cir. 2011).

Whittinghill v. Board of Com'rs of Woodward County

68 Okla. 320 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 1918

Board of County Commissioners of Logan County v. Jones, 4 Okla. 341 , 51 Pac. 565 ; Anderson v. Board of Commissioners of Grant County, 44 Okla. 165 , 143 Pac. 1145 ; Baker v. … News-Dispatcb Printing & Auditing Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Grady County, 61 Okla. 259, 161 Pac. 207 ; Chase v. Board of Commissioners, 37 Colo. 268 , 86 Pac. 1011 , 11 Ann. Cas. 483.

Schulte v. Board of County Com'rs Pontotoc Co.

122 Okla. 205 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 30, 1926

party, the authority of the board to employ counsel was not limited by the rule laid down in Honnold v. … Board of County Commissioners, supra, and as supporting this contention he cites Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County v.

Renner v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County

195 Okla. 400 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1945

Beatrice Creamery Co. v. Industrial Commission, 174 Okla. 101 , 49 P. 2d 1094 ; Clinton Cotton Oil Co. v. Holdman, 174 Okla. 423 , 50 P. 2d 732 ; Padfield v. Atlas Supply Co., 167 Okla. 364 , 29 P. 2d 958 ; Stayman v. … In Wilson v.

Brown v. Yates

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Sep 27, 2023

Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 740-41 (2001); Yousef v. Reno, 254 F.3d 1214, 1216 n.1 (10th Cir. 2001). … V.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Excise Board

168 Okla. 408 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1934

See Faught v. City of Sapulpa, supra; In re Protest of St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co., 157 Okla. 131 , 11 P. (2d) 189 , and County Excise Board of Creek County v. Gulf Pipe Dine Co., 156 Okla. 103 , 9 P. (2d) 460 . … That identical question was before this court in Excise Board of Creek County v. Gulf Pipe Line Co., supra, and in Protest, of St. Louis S. P. Ry.

Board of Com'rs of Pottawatomie County v. Waldrep

150 Okla. 228 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1931

Commissioners of Jefferson County, 13 Kan. 182 , and Nichols v. Board of Commissioners of Shawnee County (Kan.), 91 Pac. 79 . … Such has been the uniform holding of this court, and in Rice v.

Unit Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board

66 O.B.A.J. 2221 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1995

Simpson v. Dixon, 853 P.2d 176 (Okla.1993). … In American Home Products Corp. v.

BANKING BD. OF STATE OF OKL. v. Wilkerson

642 P.2d 1141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1982

On at least two occasions we have held that appeals from the Banking Board must be reviewed on this basis. See Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166, 169 (Okl.1973); Village Bank v. Seikel, 503 P.2d 550 (Okl.1972). … The Brown decision recognized the substantial evidence rule as promulgated by the U. S. Supreme Court in Universal Camera Corp. v. National L. R.

Board County Commissioners of Garfield Co. v. Porter

19 Okla. 588 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 5, 1907

Rodolf v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County

122 Okla. 120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

Clark v. … Cadman v. Smith, 15 Okla. 633 , 85 Pac. 346 ; Smith v. Bostapah, 103 Okla. 258 , 229 Pac. 1039 ; Sitton v. Hernstadt, 106 Okla. 140 , 233 Pac. 676 .

Brown v. Yates

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Mar 27, 2023

Hutchinson v. Pfeil, 105 F.3d 562, 564 (10th Cir. 1997). … Tuckel v. Grover, 660 F.3d 1249, 1254 (10th Cir. 2011).

Board of County Com'rs v. Owen

196 Okla. 536 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1946

HURST, V. C. J. … King v. McCurdy, 171 Okla. 445 , 43 P. 2d 124 , and Seaman v. Chesnut, 190 Okla. 582 , 71 P. 2d 965 . The defendant relies upon City of Hollis v. Gould, 190 Okla. 335 , 123 P. 2d 241 , and 29 C. J. 377.

Douglass v. Board of County Com'rs

271 P.2d 720 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1954

The parties here appear in the same position as in the trial court and will be referred to as plaintiff and the Board. *721 The pivotal question for our decision is whether the defendant, the Board of County Commissioners … In support of the Board’s position it cites the case of Hoyt v. Carey, 186 Okl. 114 , 95 P.2d 891 . In that case plaintiff sought a recovery in excess of the sum authorized under his contract with the county.

Brown v. Flowers

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Apr 14, 2023

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff Brittney Brown’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 231). … In Busby v.

Thigpen v. Board of County Commissioners

277 P.2d 992 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1954

State Industrial Commission, 150 Okl. 94 , 300 P. 627 ; Board of Commissioners of Marshall County v. Lacy, 161 Okl. 138 , 17 P.2d 398 ; Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Bilby, 174 Okl. 199 , 50 P.2d 398 . … Such was the rule applied in Board of Commissioners [of Garfield County] v.