Case law

Corb v. Board of Health

101 N.J.L. 50 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1925

In Istvan v. Naar, 84 N. J. L. 113, this court held that the foregoing legislative language, was not sufficient to have the effect of abolishing boards of health organized under the general act of 1887. Comp. … London v. Gilbert, 86 N. J. L. 551; Lang v. Bayonne, 74 Id. 455.

New Jersey Wholesale Drug Co. v. Brown

289 F. 108 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 24, 1922

Veeder v. United States, 252 Fed. 414 , 164 C. C. A. 338 . … Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U. S. 385 .”

Board of Trustees of Public Employees' Retirement System v. Board of Freeholders

47 N.J. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 1966

The issue is whether the County of Warren is liable for certain contributions demanded by the Board of Trustees of the Public Employees’ Retirement System with respect to a supervisor of official court reporters for Passaic … Super. 187 (Law Div. 1965), and we certified the appeal of the Board of Trustees before the Appellate Division heard it.

Applestein v. United Board & Carton Corp.

35 N.J. 343 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961

Trustees of Princeton University v. Trust Co. of N. J., 22 N. J. 587, at p. 598 (1956); O’Loughlin v. O’Loughlin, 6 N. … See Massari v. Einsiedler, 6 N. J. 303 (1951); Ajamian v. Schlanger, 14 N. J. 483 (1954); Thatcher v. Jerry O’Mahony, Inc., 39 N. J. Super. 330 (App. Div. 1956); Vacca v. Stika, 21 N. J. 471 (1956).

Nicholson v. Board of Education

83 N.J.L. 36 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 21, 1912

pointed out in State v. … Rogers, 27 Vroom 480 , and in Gulnac v.

Evans v. Board of Education

13 N.J. Misc. 506 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 26, 1935

Skladzien v. Board of Education of Bayonne, supra. It is not material to the determination of this case that the solicitor of a board of education be regarded as an officer. … State, Hoxsey, Pros., v. Paterson, 40 N. J. L. *508 186. His term of office, as before noted, was either fixed at one year by the resolution creating the office or by law. The Supreme Court held in Board of Education v.

McCoy v. Board of Review

381 N.J. Super. 169 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 7, 2005

Krauss v. A. & M. Karagheusian, Inc., 13 N.J. 447, 457 , 100 A.2d 277 (1953). In particular, McCoy relies on our decision in Tung-Sol Electric, Inc. v. … We also find inapposite Scardina v. Commonwealth of Pa, Unemployment Comp.

Ott v. Board of Education

78 N.J. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 19, 1978

Ensslin v. Board of Trustees

311 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1998

See Fiola v. New Jersey Treas. Dept., 193 N.J.Super. 340, 351 , 474 A.2d 23 (App.Div.1984). Cf . Galligan v. … In the absence of any such likelihood, the Board’s decision in this matter must be seen to have been unduly rigid. See Cammarata v.

United Board & Carton Corp. v. Britting

63 N.J. Super. 517 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 12, 1960

Super. 517 (1959) 164 A.2d 824 UNITED BOARD & CARTON CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. WILLIAM J. BRITTING, HOWARD V. BRITTING, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. … For a clear statement of this legal principle and the reasons underlying it, see Haut v. Rossbach, 128 N.J. Eq. 77 ( Ch. 1940); National Tile Board Corp. v. Panelboard Mfg. Co., 27 N.J. Super. 348 ( Ch.

Mahnken v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

62 N.J.L. 404 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1898

Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Righter, 13 Vroom 180 ; Central Railroad Co. v. Moore, 4 Zab. 824; Durant v. Palmer, 5 Dutcher 544; Houston v. Traphagen, 18 Vroom 23 ; Comben v. Belleville Stone Co., 30 Id. 226 ; Whart. … In Durant v.

Local Board of Health v. Eastlack

68 N.J.L. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1902

No nuisance existed on the premises until a case of small-pox broke out in a member of the tenant's family, whose excretions were emptied into the cesspool,'by the direction of the defendant board of health, who also had … The board of health was entirely without power to abrogate this legal rule by authorizing the prosecutor to come and clean out the closet. The judgment is set aside, with costs.

Walsh v. Board of Education

73 N.J.L. 643 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1906

In Mabon v. … In Browning v. Camden and Woodbury Railroad Co., 3 Gr.

Kraft v. Board of Education

67 N.J.L. 512 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1902

Green v. Cape May , 12 Id. 45; State v. Jersey City, 3 Dutcher 493; Burlington v. Dennison, supra; Foster v. Cape May, supra. … Cape May, &c., Railroad Co. v. *515 Cape May , 8 Stew. Eq. 419; Van Reipen v. Jersey City, 29 Vroom 262 ; Oakley v. Atlantic City, 34 Id. 127; Ryan v. City of Paterson, 37 Id. 533; 2 Dill. Mun.

Johnson v. Board of Commissioners

33 N.J. Eq. 152 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1880

Milward v. Earl of Thanet, 5 Ves. 720, note b. … Eads v. Williams, 4 De G. M. & G. 691. In Van Doren v. Robinson, 1 C. E. Gr. 263, Chancellor Green said : “ Great delay, unaccounted for, is a bar to a claim for specific performance.”

Galbraith v. Board of Education

152 N.J. 185 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 31, 1997

Certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the State Board of Education for reconsideration after the parties have been afforded the opportunity to supplement the record in respect of the “reasonableness

Aldridge v. Essex Public Road Board

51 N.J.L. 166 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1888

City of Elizabeth v. Hill, 10 Vroom 555 ; Davenport v. City of Elizabeth , 12 Id. 362; Fuller v. City of Elizabeth , 13 Id. 427. … Lim. 95; Maxwell v. Goetschius, 11 Vroom 383 , 390.

Astley v. Board of Commissioners

98 N.J.L. 251 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

In the case of Attorney-General v. McKelvey, 78 N. J. … Justice Parker in Mount v. Howell, 85 Id. 487, 489.

James v. Board of Trustees

323 N.J. Super. 100 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1999

grounds, relying upon Steinmann v. … As Justice Schreiber wrote for the Court in Young v.

Hart v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

57 N.J.L. 90 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1894

Justice Garrison, in his •opinion in Waters v. Newark, 28 Atl. … Jersey City v. Kiernan, 21 Vroom 246 . The exemption of municipal corporations from liability to ■such actions has been put by our courts on the ground of ancient precedent and public policy. Livermore v.